非小细胞肺癌根治性切除术后无复发生存率在吸入气体麻醉和基于异丙酚的全静脉麻醉之间的比较:一项多中心随机临床试验(GAS TIVA 试验):方案说明。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Jeayoun Kim, Susie Yoon, In-Kyung Song, Kyuho Lee, Wonjung Hwang, Heezoo Kim, Dong Kyu Lee, Hyun Kyoung Lim, Seong-Hyop Kim, Jong Wha Lee, Boohwi Hong, Randal S Blank, Alessia Pedoto, Wanda Popescu, Glezinis Theresa, Archer Kilbourne Martin, Mathew Patteril, Atipong Pathanasethpong, Yada Thongsuk, Tanatporn Pisitpitayasaree, Aijie Huang, Hui Yu, Poonam Malhotra Kapoor, Kyunga Kim, Sang Ah Chi, Hyun Joo Ahn
{"title":"非小细胞肺癌根治性切除术后无复发生存率在吸入气体麻醉和基于异丙酚的全静脉麻醉之间的比较:一项多中心随机临床试验(GAS TIVA 试验):方案说明。","authors":"Jeayoun Kim, Susie Yoon, In-Kyung Song, Kyuho Lee, Wonjung Hwang, Heezoo Kim, Dong Kyu Lee, Hyun Kyoung Lim, Seong-Hyop Kim, Jong Wha Lee, Boohwi Hong, Randal S Blank, Alessia Pedoto, Wanda Popescu, Glezinis Theresa, Archer Kilbourne Martin, Mathew Patteril, Atipong Pathanasethpong, Yada Thongsuk, Tanatporn Pisitpitayasaree, Aijie Huang, Hui Yu, Poonam Malhotra Kapoor, Kyunga Kim, Sang Ah Chi, Hyun Joo Ahn","doi":"10.1186/s13741-024-00436-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgery is the primary treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but microscopic residual disease may be unavoidable. Preclinical studies have shown that volatile anesthetics might suppress host immunity and promote a pro-malignant environment that supports cancer cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis, whereas propofol may preserve cell-mediated immunity and inhibit tumor angiogenesis. However, clinical evidence that propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) can reduce tumor recurrence after curative resection remains inconsistent due to the retrospective observational nature of previous studies. Therefore, we will test the hypothesis that the recurrence-free survival (RFS) after curative resection of NSCLC is higher in patients who received TIVA than volatile anesthetics (GAS) in this multicenter randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blind, randomized trial will enroll patients at 22 international sites, subject to study registration, institutional review board approval, and patient written informed consent. Eligible patients are adult patients undergoing lung resection surgery with curative intent for NSCLC. Exclusion criteria will be contraindications to study drugs, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status IV or higher, or preexisting distant metastasis or malignant tumor in other organs. At each study site, enrolled subjects will be randomly allocated into the TIVA and GAS groups with a 1:1 ratio. This pragmatic trial does not standardize any aspect of patient care. However, potential confounders will be balanced between the study arms. The primary outcome will be RFS. Secondary outcomes will be overall survival and complications within postoperative 7 days. Enrollment of 5384 patients will provide 80% power to detect a 3% treatment effect (hazard ratio of 0.83) at alpha 0.05 for RFS at 3 years.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Confirmation of the study hypothesis would demonstrate that a relatively minor and low-cost alteration in anesthetic management has the potential to reduce cancer recurrence risk in NSCLC, an ultimately fatal complication. Rejection of the hypothesis would end the ongoing debate about the relationship between cancer recurrence and anesthetic management.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study protocol was prospectively registered at the Clinical trials ( https://clinicaltrials.gov , NCT06330038, principal investigator: Hyun Joo Ahn; date of first public release: March 25, 2024) before the recruitment of the first participant.</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recurrence-free survival after curative resection of non-small cell lung cancer between inhalational gas anesthesia and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia: a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial (GAS TIVA trial): protocol description.\",\"authors\":\"Jeayoun Kim, Susie Yoon, In-Kyung Song, Kyuho Lee, Wonjung Hwang, Heezoo Kim, Dong Kyu Lee, Hyun Kyoung Lim, Seong-Hyop Kim, Jong Wha Lee, Boohwi Hong, Randal S Blank, Alessia Pedoto, Wanda Popescu, Glezinis Theresa, Archer Kilbourne Martin, Mathew Patteril, Atipong Pathanasethpong, Yada Thongsuk, Tanatporn Pisitpitayasaree, Aijie Huang, Hui Yu, Poonam Malhotra Kapoor, Kyunga Kim, Sang Ah Chi, Hyun Joo Ahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13741-024-00436-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgery is the primary treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but microscopic residual disease may be unavoidable. Preclinical studies have shown that volatile anesthetics might suppress host immunity and promote a pro-malignant environment that supports cancer cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis, whereas propofol may preserve cell-mediated immunity and inhibit tumor angiogenesis. However, clinical evidence that propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) can reduce tumor recurrence after curative resection remains inconsistent due to the retrospective observational nature of previous studies. Therefore, we will test the hypothesis that the recurrence-free survival (RFS) after curative resection of NSCLC is higher in patients who received TIVA than volatile anesthetics (GAS) in this multicenter randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blind, randomized trial will enroll patients at 22 international sites, subject to study registration, institutional review board approval, and patient written informed consent. Eligible patients are adult patients undergoing lung resection surgery with curative intent for NSCLC. Exclusion criteria will be contraindications to study drugs, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status IV or higher, or preexisting distant metastasis or malignant tumor in other organs. At each study site, enrolled subjects will be randomly allocated into the TIVA and GAS groups with a 1:1 ratio. This pragmatic trial does not standardize any aspect of patient care. However, potential confounders will be balanced between the study arms. The primary outcome will be RFS. Secondary outcomes will be overall survival and complications within postoperative 7 days. Enrollment of 5384 patients will provide 80% power to detect a 3% treatment effect (hazard ratio of 0.83) at alpha 0.05 for RFS at 3 years.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Confirmation of the study hypothesis would demonstrate that a relatively minor and low-cost alteration in anesthetic management has the potential to reduce cancer recurrence risk in NSCLC, an ultimately fatal complication. Rejection of the hypothesis would end the ongoing debate about the relationship between cancer recurrence and anesthetic management.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study protocol was prospectively registered at the Clinical trials ( https://clinicaltrials.gov , NCT06330038, principal investigator: Hyun Joo Ahn; date of first public release: March 25, 2024) before the recruitment of the first participant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perioperative Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264408/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perioperative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00436-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00436-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手术是治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的主要方法,但可能无法避免微小残留病灶。临床前研究表明,挥发性麻醉药可能会抑制宿主免疫力,并促进有利于癌细胞增殖、迁移和血管生成的恶性环境,而丙泊酚则可能会保持细胞介导的免疫力并抑制肿瘤血管生成。然而,由于以往研究的回顾性观察性质,基于异丙酚的全静脉麻醉(TIVA)可减少治愈性切除术后肿瘤复发的临床证据仍不一致。因此,我们将在这项多中心随机试验中验证以下假设:接受 TIVA 的 NSCLC 患者在根治性切除术后的无复发生存率(RFS)高于接受挥发性麻醉药(GAS)的患者:这项双盲随机试验将在 22 个国际研究机构招募患者,但必须经过研究注册、机构审查委员会批准和患者书面知情同意。符合条件的患者为因 NSCLC 而接受根治性肺切除手术的成年患者。排除标准为研究药物禁忌症、美国麻醉医师协会体能状况 IV 级或更高、或其他器官已有远处转移或恶性肿瘤。在每个研究地点,入组受试者将按 1:1 的比例随机分配到 TIVA 组和 GAS 组。这项实用性试验不会对患者护理的任何方面进行标准化。不过,研究臂之间将平衡潜在的混杂因素。主要结果是RFS。次要结果是总生存率和术后 7 天内的并发症。在α值为0.05时,5384名患者的入组将提供80%的力量来检测3年后RFS的3%治疗效果(危险比为0.83):讨论:如果研究假设得到证实,则表明麻醉管理中一个相对较小且成本较低的改变有可能降低 NSCLC 癌症复发的风险,而癌症复发是一种最终致命的并发症。拒绝该假设将结束目前关于癌症复发与麻醉管理之间关系的争论:研究方案已在临床试验网( https://clinicaltrials.gov ,NCT06330038,主要研究者:Hyun Joo Ahn;首次公开发布日期:2024 年 3 月 25 日:首次公开发布日期:2024 年 3 月 25 日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recurrence-free survival after curative resection of non-small cell lung cancer between inhalational gas anesthesia and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia: a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial (GAS TIVA trial): protocol description.

Background: Surgery is the primary treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but microscopic residual disease may be unavoidable. Preclinical studies have shown that volatile anesthetics might suppress host immunity and promote a pro-malignant environment that supports cancer cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis, whereas propofol may preserve cell-mediated immunity and inhibit tumor angiogenesis. However, clinical evidence that propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) can reduce tumor recurrence after curative resection remains inconsistent due to the retrospective observational nature of previous studies. Therefore, we will test the hypothesis that the recurrence-free survival (RFS) after curative resection of NSCLC is higher in patients who received TIVA than volatile anesthetics (GAS) in this multicenter randomized trial.

Methods: This double-blind, randomized trial will enroll patients at 22 international sites, subject to study registration, institutional review board approval, and patient written informed consent. Eligible patients are adult patients undergoing lung resection surgery with curative intent for NSCLC. Exclusion criteria will be contraindications to study drugs, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status IV or higher, or preexisting distant metastasis or malignant tumor in other organs. At each study site, enrolled subjects will be randomly allocated into the TIVA and GAS groups with a 1:1 ratio. This pragmatic trial does not standardize any aspect of patient care. However, potential confounders will be balanced between the study arms. The primary outcome will be RFS. Secondary outcomes will be overall survival and complications within postoperative 7 days. Enrollment of 5384 patients will provide 80% power to detect a 3% treatment effect (hazard ratio of 0.83) at alpha 0.05 for RFS at 3 years.

Discussion: Confirmation of the study hypothesis would demonstrate that a relatively minor and low-cost alteration in anesthetic management has the potential to reduce cancer recurrence risk in NSCLC, an ultimately fatal complication. Rejection of the hypothesis would end the ongoing debate about the relationship between cancer recurrence and anesthetic management.

Trial registration: The study protocol was prospectively registered at the Clinical trials ( https://clinicaltrials.gov , NCT06330038, principal investigator: Hyun Joo Ahn; date of first public release: March 25, 2024) before the recruitment of the first participant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信