利用代谢组生物标志物诊断子痫前期。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Hypertension in Pregnancy Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1080/10641955.2024.2379386
Yunfan Tian, Mingwei Liu, Jin-Yu Sun, Yifeng Wang, Lianmin Chen, Wei Sun, Ling Zhou
{"title":"利用代谢组生物标志物诊断子痫前期。","authors":"Yunfan Tian, Mingwei Liu, Jin-Yu Sun, Yifeng Wang, Lianmin Chen, Wei Sun, Ling Zhou","doi":"10.1080/10641955.2024.2379386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnostic criteria for preeclampsia do not accurately reflect the pathophysiological characteristics of patients with preeclampsia. Conventional biomarkers and diagnostic approaches have proven insufficient to fully comprehend the intricacies of preeclampsia. This study aimed to screen differentially abundant metabolites as candidate biomarkers for preeclampsia. A propensity score matching method was used to perform a 1:1 match between preeclampsia patients (<i>n</i> = 70) and healthy control individuals (<i>n</i> = 70). Based on univariate and multivariate statistical analysis methods, the different characteristic metabolites were screened and identified. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was subsequently used to further screen for differentially abundant metabolites. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the metabolites. A total of 1,630 metabolites were identified and quantified in maternal serum samples. Fifty-three metabolites were significantly increased, and two were significantly decreased in preeclampsia patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model composed of isobutyryl-L-carnitine and acetyl-leucine was 0.878, and the sensitivity and specificity in detecting preeclampsia were 81.4% and 87.1%, respectively. There are significant differences in metabolism between preeclampsia patients and healthy pregnant women, and a range of novel biomarkers have been identified. These findings lay the foundation for the use of metabolomic biomarkers for the diagnosis of preeclampsia.</p>","PeriodicalId":13054,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension in Pregnancy","volume":"43 1","pages":"2379386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosis of preeclampsia using metabolomic biomarkers.\",\"authors\":\"Yunfan Tian, Mingwei Liu, Jin-Yu Sun, Yifeng Wang, Lianmin Chen, Wei Sun, Ling Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10641955.2024.2379386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The diagnostic criteria for preeclampsia do not accurately reflect the pathophysiological characteristics of patients with preeclampsia. Conventional biomarkers and diagnostic approaches have proven insufficient to fully comprehend the intricacies of preeclampsia. This study aimed to screen differentially abundant metabolites as candidate biomarkers for preeclampsia. A propensity score matching method was used to perform a 1:1 match between preeclampsia patients (<i>n</i> = 70) and healthy control individuals (<i>n</i> = 70). Based on univariate and multivariate statistical analysis methods, the different characteristic metabolites were screened and identified. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was subsequently used to further screen for differentially abundant metabolites. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the metabolites. A total of 1,630 metabolites were identified and quantified in maternal serum samples. Fifty-three metabolites were significantly increased, and two were significantly decreased in preeclampsia patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model composed of isobutyryl-L-carnitine and acetyl-leucine was 0.878, and the sensitivity and specificity in detecting preeclampsia were 81.4% and 87.1%, respectively. There are significant differences in metabolism between preeclampsia patients and healthy pregnant women, and a range of novel biomarkers have been identified. These findings lay the foundation for the use of metabolomic biomarkers for the diagnosis of preeclampsia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension in Pregnancy\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"2379386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension in Pregnancy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641955.2024.2379386\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension in Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641955.2024.2379386","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

子痫前期的诊断标准并不能准确反映子痫前期患者的病理生理特点。传统的生物标志物和诊断方法已被证明不足以完全理解子痫前期的复杂性。本研究旨在筛选不同含量的代谢物作为子痫前期的候选生物标志物。采用倾向得分匹配法对子痫前期患者(70 人)和健康对照组(70 人)进行 1:1 匹配。根据单变量和多变量统计分析方法,筛选并确定了不同特征的代谢物。随后使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归分析进一步筛选出不同含量的代谢物。绘制接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)来评估代谢物的诊断效果。在母体血清样本中共鉴定和定量了 1,630 种代谢物。子痫前期患者的 53 种代谢物明显增加,两种代谢物明显减少。由异丁酰-L-肉碱和乙酰亮氨酸组成的模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.878,检测子痫前期的灵敏度和特异度分别为 81.4% 和 87.1%。子痫前期患者与健康孕妇在代谢方面存在明显差异,并发现了一系列新型生物标记物。这些发现为利用代谢组生物标志物诊断子痫前期奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnosis of preeclampsia using metabolomic biomarkers.

The diagnostic criteria for preeclampsia do not accurately reflect the pathophysiological characteristics of patients with preeclampsia. Conventional biomarkers and diagnostic approaches have proven insufficient to fully comprehend the intricacies of preeclampsia. This study aimed to screen differentially abundant metabolites as candidate biomarkers for preeclampsia. A propensity score matching method was used to perform a 1:1 match between preeclampsia patients (n = 70) and healthy control individuals (n = 70). Based on univariate and multivariate statistical analysis methods, the different characteristic metabolites were screened and identified. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was subsequently used to further screen for differentially abundant metabolites. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the metabolites. A total of 1,630 metabolites were identified and quantified in maternal serum samples. Fifty-three metabolites were significantly increased, and two were significantly decreased in preeclampsia patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model composed of isobutyryl-L-carnitine and acetyl-leucine was 0.878, and the sensitivity and specificity in detecting preeclampsia were 81.4% and 87.1%, respectively. There are significant differences in metabolism between preeclampsia patients and healthy pregnant women, and a range of novel biomarkers have been identified. These findings lay the foundation for the use of metabolomic biomarkers for the diagnosis of preeclampsia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension in Pregnancy
Hypertension in Pregnancy 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Hypertension in Pregnancy is a refereed journal in the English language which publishes data pertaining to human and animal hypertension during gestation. Contributions concerning physiology of circulatory control, pathophysiology, methodology, therapy or any other material relevant to the relationship between elevated blood pressure and pregnancy are acceptable. Published material includes original articles, clinical trials, solicited and unsolicited reviews, editorials, letters, and other material deemed pertinent by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信