中度至重度银屑病的生物治疗序列。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Samantha Ting, Patricia Lowe, Annika Smith, Pablo Fernández-Peñas
{"title":"中度至重度银屑病的生物治疗序列。","authors":"Samantha Ting, Patricia Lowe, Annika Smith, Pablo Fernández-Peñas","doi":"10.1111/ajd.14350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The advent of novel biologics has led to an increase in biologic-switching as patients and clinicians pursue improved clinical outcomes. However, guidance on treatment sequencing in an Australian setting is sparse. This study examines the patterns of care across two tertiary centres in Australia and characterizes the factors contributing to biologic-switching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of patients who attended the outpatient Dermatology biologic clinics across two tertiary hospitals was conducted. Data on treatment sequencing and patients' PASI at every visit from April 2006 to December 2020 were collected. Patterns of biologic-switching were examined. The speed of treatment response for each biologic was determined by the time to achieve PASI-90 and -100 for each treatment course.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 440 treatment courses were analysed. Ustekinumab and adalimumab were the most frequently prescribed first-line biologics. The highest proportion of biologic-switching was observed among patients on TNF-α inhibitors (63.8%). After 2015, more patients were prescribed IL-12/23 and IL-17 inhibitors in favour of TNF-α inhibitors. IL-17 inhibitors demonstrated the most rapid treatment response and low PASI scores relative to other biologics. Patients who did not switch biologics had lower rates of psoriatic arthritis and lower BMI, compared to patients who switched biologics. The median PASI on discontinuation generally exceeded 3.0, while on continuation, it was less than 1.2, reflecting patients' and clinicians' thresholds for biologic-switching.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates an increased uptake of more novel biologics as they become available, due to improved safety profiles and clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8638,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biologic treatment sequences in moderate-to-severe psoriasis.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Ting, Patricia Lowe, Annika Smith, Pablo Fernández-Peñas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajd.14350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The advent of novel biologics has led to an increase in biologic-switching as patients and clinicians pursue improved clinical outcomes. However, guidance on treatment sequencing in an Australian setting is sparse. This study examines the patterns of care across two tertiary centres in Australia and characterizes the factors contributing to biologic-switching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of patients who attended the outpatient Dermatology biologic clinics across two tertiary hospitals was conducted. Data on treatment sequencing and patients' PASI at every visit from April 2006 to December 2020 were collected. Patterns of biologic-switching were examined. The speed of treatment response for each biologic was determined by the time to achieve PASI-90 and -100 for each treatment course.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 440 treatment courses were analysed. Ustekinumab and adalimumab were the most frequently prescribed first-line biologics. The highest proportion of biologic-switching was observed among patients on TNF-α inhibitors (63.8%). After 2015, more patients were prescribed IL-12/23 and IL-17 inhibitors in favour of TNF-α inhibitors. IL-17 inhibitors demonstrated the most rapid treatment response and low PASI scores relative to other biologics. Patients who did not switch biologics had lower rates of psoriatic arthritis and lower BMI, compared to patients who switched biologics. The median PASI on discontinuation generally exceeded 3.0, while on continuation, it was less than 1.2, reflecting patients' and clinicians' thresholds for biologic-switching.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates an increased uptake of more novel biologics as they become available, due to improved safety profiles and clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Dermatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.14350\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.14350","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着新型生物制剂的出现,患者和临床医生为了追求更好的临床疗效,越来越多地更换生物制剂。然而,澳大利亚的治疗排序指南却很少。本研究探讨了澳大利亚两家三级医疗中心的治疗模式,并分析了导致生物制剂转换的因素:方法:本研究对两家三级医院皮肤科生物门诊的患者进行了回顾性研究。研究收集了 2006 年 4 月至 2020 年 12 月期间每次就诊时的治疗排序和患者 PASI 数据。对生物制剂转换模式进行了研究。根据每个疗程达到 PASI-90 和 -100 的时间来确定每种生物制剂的治疗反应速度:结果:共分析了 440 个疗程。乌司替库单抗和阿达木单抗是最常处方的一线生物制剂。在使用 TNF-α 抑制剂的患者中,生物制剂转换的比例最高(63.8%)。2015年后,越来越多的患者开始使用IL-12/23和IL-17抑制剂,而不再使用TNF-α抑制剂。与其他生物制剂相比,IL-17抑制剂的治疗反应最快,PASI评分较低。与更换生物制剂的患者相比,未更换生物制剂的患者患银屑病关节炎的比例较低,体重指数也较低。停药时的 PASI 中位数通常超过 3.0,而继续用药时则低于 1.2,这反映了患者和临床医生对更换生物制剂的阈值:这项研究表明,随着更多新型生物制剂的上市,其安全性和临床疗效都会得到改善,因此患者对它们的接受度也会提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biologic treatment sequences in moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Background: The advent of novel biologics has led to an increase in biologic-switching as patients and clinicians pursue improved clinical outcomes. However, guidance on treatment sequencing in an Australian setting is sparse. This study examines the patterns of care across two tertiary centres in Australia and characterizes the factors contributing to biologic-switching.

Methods: A retrospective study of patients who attended the outpatient Dermatology biologic clinics across two tertiary hospitals was conducted. Data on treatment sequencing and patients' PASI at every visit from April 2006 to December 2020 were collected. Patterns of biologic-switching were examined. The speed of treatment response for each biologic was determined by the time to achieve PASI-90 and -100 for each treatment course.

Results: A total of 440 treatment courses were analysed. Ustekinumab and adalimumab were the most frequently prescribed first-line biologics. The highest proportion of biologic-switching was observed among patients on TNF-α inhibitors (63.8%). After 2015, more patients were prescribed IL-12/23 and IL-17 inhibitors in favour of TNF-α inhibitors. IL-17 inhibitors demonstrated the most rapid treatment response and low PASI scores relative to other biologics. Patients who did not switch biologics had lower rates of psoriatic arthritis and lower BMI, compared to patients who switched biologics. The median PASI on discontinuation generally exceeded 3.0, while on continuation, it was less than 1.2, reflecting patients' and clinicians' thresholds for biologic-switching.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates an increased uptake of more novel biologics as they become available, due to improved safety profiles and clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal of Dermatology is the official journal of the Australasian College of Dermatologists and the New Zealand Dermatological Society, publishing peer-reviewed, original research articles, reviews and case reports dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research in dermatology. Clinical presentations, medical and physical therapies and investigations, including dermatopathology and mycology, are covered. Short articles may be published under the headings ‘Signs, Syndromes and Diagnoses’, ‘Dermatopathology Presentation’, ‘Vignettes in Contact Dermatology’, ‘Surgery Corner’ or ‘Letters to the Editor’.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信