在 2 型糖尿病和心血管疾病高风险或已确诊心血管疾病患者中优化使用胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂的障碍和策略:西班牙德尔菲共识》。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Manuel Botana López, Miguel Camafort Babkowski, Raquel Campuzano Ruiz, Ana Cebrián Cuenca, Manuel Gargallo Fernández, Héctor David de Paz, Jennifer Redondo-Antón, Esther Artime, Silvia Díaz-Cerezo, Miriam Rubio de Santos
{"title":"在 2 型糖尿病和心血管疾病高风险或已确诊心血管疾病患者中优化使用胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂的障碍和策略:西班牙德尔菲共识》。","authors":"Manuel Botana López,&nbsp;Miguel Camafort Babkowski,&nbsp;Raquel Campuzano Ruiz,&nbsp;Ana Cebrián Cuenca,&nbsp;Manuel Gargallo Fernández,&nbsp;Héctor David de Paz,&nbsp;Jennifer Redondo-Antón,&nbsp;Esther Artime,&nbsp;Silvia Díaz-Cerezo,&nbsp;Miriam Rubio de Santos","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-02938-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are effective for glycemic control, with many also demonstrating cardiovascular (CV) benefit, in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to find a consensus on the barriers and strategies for the optimal use of GLP-1 RAs in people with T2D and high CV risk or established cardiovascular disease (CVD) in Spain.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A two-round Delphi survey (53 questions) was conducted among members of four national scientific societies in Spain, including physicians experienced in the management of people with T2D. The degree of consensus was evaluated with a 7-point Likert scale, establishing consensus when ≥ 70% of the panelists agreed (6–7) or disagreed (1–2).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 97 physicians participated in the first round (endocrinology: 34%, family and community medicine: 21%, internal medicine: 23%, and cardiology: 23%), and 96 in the second round. The main barriers identified were: therapeutic inertia and late use of GLP-1 RAs; lack of a comprehensive approach to CV risk; lack of knowledge on the usefulness of GLP-1 RAs in CVD prevention and treatment; and economic/administrative barriers. Strategies with a highest consensus included: the need to establish simple protocols that integrate awareness of CV risk monitoring; training professionals and patients; and the use of new technologies.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Physicians identified clinical, healthcare, and economic/administrative barriers that limit the use of GLP-1 RAs in people with T2D and high CV risk or established CVD in Spain, highlighting the importance of integrating these therapies according to clinical practice guidelines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and Strategies to Optimize the Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists in People with Type 2 Diabetes and High Cardiovascular Risk or Established Cardiovascular Disease: A Delphi Consensus in Spain\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Botana López,&nbsp;Miguel Camafort Babkowski,&nbsp;Raquel Campuzano Ruiz,&nbsp;Ana Cebrián Cuenca,&nbsp;Manuel Gargallo Fernández,&nbsp;Héctor David de Paz,&nbsp;Jennifer Redondo-Antón,&nbsp;Esther Artime,&nbsp;Silvia Díaz-Cerezo,&nbsp;Miriam Rubio de Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12325-024-02938-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are effective for glycemic control, with many also demonstrating cardiovascular (CV) benefit, in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to find a consensus on the barriers and strategies for the optimal use of GLP-1 RAs in people with T2D and high CV risk or established cardiovascular disease (CVD) in Spain.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A two-round Delphi survey (53 questions) was conducted among members of four national scientific societies in Spain, including physicians experienced in the management of people with T2D. The degree of consensus was evaluated with a 7-point Likert scale, establishing consensus when ≥ 70% of the panelists agreed (6–7) or disagreed (1–2).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 97 physicians participated in the first round (endocrinology: 34%, family and community medicine: 21%, internal medicine: 23%, and cardiology: 23%), and 96 in the second round. The main barriers identified were: therapeutic inertia and late use of GLP-1 RAs; lack of a comprehensive approach to CV risk; lack of knowledge on the usefulness of GLP-1 RAs in CVD prevention and treatment; and economic/administrative barriers. Strategies with a highest consensus included: the need to establish simple protocols that integrate awareness of CV risk monitoring; training professionals and patients; and the use of new technologies.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Physicians identified clinical, healthcare, and economic/administrative barriers that limit the use of GLP-1 RAs in people with T2D and high CV risk or established CVD in Spain, highlighting the importance of integrating these therapies according to clinical practice guidelines.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349830/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-02938-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-02938-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)可有效控制血糖,其中许多药物还对 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的心血管疾病(CV)有益。本研究旨在就西班牙 2 型糖尿病和高心血管疾病风险或已确诊心血管疾病(CVD)患者最佳使用 GLP-1 RAs 的障碍和策略达成共识:对西班牙四个国家科学协会的成员进行了两轮德尔菲调查(53 个问题),其中包括在 T2D 患者管理方面经验丰富的医生。共识程度采用 7 点李克特量表进行评估,当≥ 70% 的小组成员同意(6-7 点)或不同意(1-2 点)时,即达成共识:共有 97 名医生参加了第一轮讨论(内分泌科:34%;家庭和社区医学科:21%;内科:23%;心脏科:23%),96 名医生参加了第二轮讨论。发现的主要障碍包括:GLP-1 RAs 的治疗惰性和延迟使用;缺乏应对心血管疾病风险的综合方法;对 GLP-1 RAs 在心血管疾病预防和治疗中的作用缺乏了解;以及经济/行政障碍。共识度最高的策略包括:需要制定简单的方案,将心血管风险监测意识融入其中;培训专业人员和患者;使用新技术:医生们发现了临床、医疗保健和经济/行政方面的障碍,这些障碍限制了 GLP-1 RAs 在西班牙 T2D 和心血管疾病高风险或已确诊心血管疾病患者中的使用,突出了根据临床实践指南整合这些疗法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Barriers and Strategies to Optimize the Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists in People with Type 2 Diabetes and High Cardiovascular Risk or Established Cardiovascular Disease: A Delphi Consensus in Spain

Barriers and Strategies to Optimize the Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists in People with Type 2 Diabetes and High Cardiovascular Risk or Established Cardiovascular Disease: A Delphi Consensus in Spain

Introduction

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are effective for glycemic control, with many also demonstrating cardiovascular (CV) benefit, in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to find a consensus on the barriers and strategies for the optimal use of GLP-1 RAs in people with T2D and high CV risk or established cardiovascular disease (CVD) in Spain.

Methods

A two-round Delphi survey (53 questions) was conducted among members of four national scientific societies in Spain, including physicians experienced in the management of people with T2D. The degree of consensus was evaluated with a 7-point Likert scale, establishing consensus when ≥ 70% of the panelists agreed (6–7) or disagreed (1–2).

Results

A total of 97 physicians participated in the first round (endocrinology: 34%, family and community medicine: 21%, internal medicine: 23%, and cardiology: 23%), and 96 in the second round. The main barriers identified were: therapeutic inertia and late use of GLP-1 RAs; lack of a comprehensive approach to CV risk; lack of knowledge on the usefulness of GLP-1 RAs in CVD prevention and treatment; and economic/administrative barriers. Strategies with a highest consensus included: the need to establish simple protocols that integrate awareness of CV risk monitoring; training professionals and patients; and the use of new technologies.

Conclusion

Physicians identified clinical, healthcare, and economic/administrative barriers that limit the use of GLP-1 RAs in people with T2D and high CV risk or established CVD in Spain, highlighting the importance of integrating these therapies according to clinical practice guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信