哥斯达黎加西北部干旱森林中美洲虎捕食家马的情况

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Brayan Morera, Víctor Montalvo, Jairo Moya, Javier Obando, Carolina Sáenz-Bolaños, Todd K. Fuller, Eduardo Carrillo
{"title":"哥斯达黎加西北部干旱森林中美洲虎捕食家马的情况","authors":"Brayan Morera,&nbsp;Víctor Montalvo,&nbsp;Jairo Moya,&nbsp;Javier Obando,&nbsp;Carolina Sáenz-Bolaños,&nbsp;Todd K. Fuller,&nbsp;Eduardo Carrillo","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Depredation of domestic horses (<i>Equus caballus</i>) by jaguars (<i>Panthera onca</i>) is an example of human–wildlife conflict that has not received much attention. We monitored spatio-temporal activity and distribution of horses in a 2.64-km<sup>2</sup> fenced area in the dry forest of northwestern Costa Rica in response to 16 jaguar killings of horses during January-November 2017. We monitored 4 horses (2 males, 2 females) equipped with global positioning system transmitters from February-September 2018 to identify daily and seasonal patterns of use of cover types and a water source by horses. We then compared these results to the previous locations where jaguars killed horses to identify the circumstances under which horses seemed more vulnerable to jaguar predation. Based on 1,693 locations, horses spent most time in grassland (92%) rather than forest and edge vegetation (8%) and used a core area of 0.74 km<sup>2</sup> (kernel density estimation) to 0.86 km<sup>2</sup> (minimum convex polygon). Of 16 horse predation events by jaguars, 9 events (56%) occurred in grasslands, 4 in forested areas (25%), and 3 in the forest edge (19%), indicating predation events occurred disproportionately from expected counts based on horse use of vegetation. The predation sites were characterized by a higher proportion of edge and a lower proportion of forest compared to a random points. We suggest that when horses explored areas near the edge of forested areas, the chances of being preyed on by jaguars increased.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jaguar predation on domestic horses in the dry forest of northwestern Costa Rica\",\"authors\":\"Brayan Morera,&nbsp;Víctor Montalvo,&nbsp;Jairo Moya,&nbsp;Javier Obando,&nbsp;Carolina Sáenz-Bolaños,&nbsp;Todd K. Fuller,&nbsp;Eduardo Carrillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jwmg.22637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Depredation of domestic horses (<i>Equus caballus</i>) by jaguars (<i>Panthera onca</i>) is an example of human–wildlife conflict that has not received much attention. We monitored spatio-temporal activity and distribution of horses in a 2.64-km<sup>2</sup> fenced area in the dry forest of northwestern Costa Rica in response to 16 jaguar killings of horses during January-November 2017. We monitored 4 horses (2 males, 2 females) equipped with global positioning system transmitters from February-September 2018 to identify daily and seasonal patterns of use of cover types and a water source by horses. We then compared these results to the previous locations where jaguars killed horses to identify the circumstances under which horses seemed more vulnerable to jaguar predation. Based on 1,693 locations, horses spent most time in grassland (92%) rather than forest and edge vegetation (8%) and used a core area of 0.74 km<sup>2</sup> (kernel density estimation) to 0.86 km<sup>2</sup> (minimum convex polygon). Of 16 horse predation events by jaguars, 9 events (56%) occurred in grasslands, 4 in forested areas (25%), and 3 in the forest edge (19%), indicating predation events occurred disproportionately from expected counts based on horse use of vegetation. The predation sites were characterized by a higher proportion of edge and a lower proportion of forest compared to a random points. We suggest that when horses explored areas near the edge of forested areas, the chances of being preyed on by jaguars increased.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22637\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22637","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美洲虎(Panthera onca)捕食家马(Equus caballus)是人类与野生动物冲突的一个例子,但并未引起广泛关注。2017 年 1 月至 11 月期间,美洲虎捕杀了 16 匹马,我们在哥斯达黎加西北部干燥森林中 2.64 平方公里的围栏区域内对马匹的时空活动和分布进行了监测。我们在 2018 年 2 月至 9 月期间对 4 匹马(2 雄性、2 雌性)进行了监测,它们都配备了全球定位系统发射器,以确定马匹使用植被类型和水源的日常和季节性模式。然后,我们将这些结果与之前美洲虎杀害马匹的地点进行比较,以确定马匹在什么情况下似乎更容易受到美洲虎的捕食。根据 1,693 个地点的数据,马匹在草地上停留的时间最多(92%),而不是在森林和边缘植被上(8%),使用的核心区域为 0.74 平方公里(核密度估算)至 0.86 平方公里(最小凸多边形)。在美洲虎捕食马匹的 16 起事件中,9 起(56%)发生在草地,4 起(25%)发生在森林地区,3 起(19%)发生在森林边缘,这表明捕食事件的发生与根据马匹利用植被的预期次数不成比例。与随机点相比,捕食点的特点是边缘比例较高,森林比例较低。我们认为,当马匹在靠近森林边缘的地区活动时,被美洲虎捕食的几率就会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Jaguar predation on domestic horses in the dry forest of northwestern Costa Rica

Jaguar predation on domestic horses in the dry forest of northwestern Costa Rica

Depredation of domestic horses (Equus caballus) by jaguars (Panthera onca) is an example of human–wildlife conflict that has not received much attention. We monitored spatio-temporal activity and distribution of horses in a 2.64-km2 fenced area in the dry forest of northwestern Costa Rica in response to 16 jaguar killings of horses during January-November 2017. We monitored 4 horses (2 males, 2 females) equipped with global positioning system transmitters from February-September 2018 to identify daily and seasonal patterns of use of cover types and a water source by horses. We then compared these results to the previous locations where jaguars killed horses to identify the circumstances under which horses seemed more vulnerable to jaguar predation. Based on 1,693 locations, horses spent most time in grassland (92%) rather than forest and edge vegetation (8%) and used a core area of 0.74 km2 (kernel density estimation) to 0.86 km2 (minimum convex polygon). Of 16 horse predation events by jaguars, 9 events (56%) occurred in grasslands, 4 in forested areas (25%), and 3 in the forest edge (19%), indicating predation events occurred disproportionately from expected counts based on horse use of vegetation. The predation sites were characterized by a higher proportion of edge and a lower proportion of forest compared to a random points. We suggest that when horses explored areas near the edge of forested areas, the chances of being preyed on by jaguars increased.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信