体育分析的方法和评估:挑战、方法和经验教训

IF 4.3 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Jesse Davis, Lotte Bransen, Laurens Devos, Arne Jaspers, Wannes Meert, Pieter Robberechts, Jan Van Haaren, Maaike Van Roy
{"title":"体育分析的方法和评估:挑战、方法和经验教训","authors":"Jesse Davis, Lotte Bransen, Laurens Devos, Arne Jaspers, Wannes Meert, Pieter Robberechts, Jan Van Haaren, Maaike Van Roy","doi":"10.1007/s10994-024-06585-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There has been an explosion of data collected about sports. Because such data is extremely rich and complex, machine learning is increasingly being used to extract actionable insights from it. Typically, machine learning is used to build models and indicators that capture the skills, capabilities, and tendencies of athletes and teams. Such indicators and models are in turn used to inform decision-making at professional clubs. Designing these indicators requires paying careful attention to a number of subtle issues from a methodological and evaluation perspective. In this paper, we highlight these challenges in sports and discuss a variety of approaches for handling them. Methodologically, we highlight that dependencies affect how to perform data partitioning for evaluation as well as the need to consider contextual factors. From an evaluation perspective, we draw a distinction between evaluating the developed indicators themselves versus the underlying models that power them. We argue that both aspects must be considered, but that they require different approaches. We hope that this article helps bridge the gap between traditional sports expertise and modern data analytics by providing a structured framework with practical examples.</p>","PeriodicalId":49900,"journal":{"name":"Machine Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodology and evaluation in sports analytics: challenges, approaches, and lessons learned\",\"authors\":\"Jesse Davis, Lotte Bransen, Laurens Devos, Arne Jaspers, Wannes Meert, Pieter Robberechts, Jan Van Haaren, Maaike Van Roy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10994-024-06585-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There has been an explosion of data collected about sports. Because such data is extremely rich and complex, machine learning is increasingly being used to extract actionable insights from it. Typically, machine learning is used to build models and indicators that capture the skills, capabilities, and tendencies of athletes and teams. Such indicators and models are in turn used to inform decision-making at professional clubs. Designing these indicators requires paying careful attention to a number of subtle issues from a methodological and evaluation perspective. In this paper, we highlight these challenges in sports and discuss a variety of approaches for handling them. Methodologically, we highlight that dependencies affect how to perform data partitioning for evaluation as well as the need to consider contextual factors. From an evaluation perspective, we draw a distinction between evaluating the developed indicators themselves versus the underlying models that power them. We argue that both aspects must be considered, but that they require different approaches. We hope that this article helps bridge the gap between traditional sports expertise and modern data analytics by providing a structured framework with practical examples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Machine Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Machine Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-024-06585-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine Learning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-024-06585-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

收集到的体育数据呈爆炸式增长。由于这些数据极其丰富和复杂,人们越来越多地使用机器学习来从中提取可行的见解。通常,机器学习用于建立模型和指标,以捕捉运动员和团队的技能、能力和倾向。这些指标和模型反过来又为职业俱乐部的决策提供依据。设计这些指标需要从方法论和评估的角度仔细关注一些微妙的问题。在本文中,我们强调了体育运动中的这些挑战,并讨论了处理这些挑战的各种方法。在方法论上,我们强调依赖性会影响如何进行数据分区以进行评估,以及考虑背景因素的必要性。从评估的角度来看,我们将评估所开发的指标本身与支持这些指标的基础模型区分开来。我们认为,这两个方面都必须考虑,但需要采用不同的方法。我们希望这篇文章通过提供一个结构化的框架和实际案例,有助于弥合传统体育专业知识与现代数据分析之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Methodology and evaluation in sports analytics: challenges, approaches, and lessons learned

Methodology and evaluation in sports analytics: challenges, approaches, and lessons learned

There has been an explosion of data collected about sports. Because such data is extremely rich and complex, machine learning is increasingly being used to extract actionable insights from it. Typically, machine learning is used to build models and indicators that capture the skills, capabilities, and tendencies of athletes and teams. Such indicators and models are in turn used to inform decision-making at professional clubs. Designing these indicators requires paying careful attention to a number of subtle issues from a methodological and evaluation perspective. In this paper, we highlight these challenges in sports and discuss a variety of approaches for handling them. Methodologically, we highlight that dependencies affect how to perform data partitioning for evaluation as well as the need to consider contextual factors. From an evaluation perspective, we draw a distinction between evaluating the developed indicators themselves versus the underlying models that power them. We argue that both aspects must be considered, but that they require different approaches. We hope that this article helps bridge the gap between traditional sports expertise and modern data analytics by providing a structured framework with practical examples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Machine Learning
Machine Learning 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
2.70%
发文量
162
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Machine Learning serves as a global platform dedicated to computational approaches in learning. The journal reports substantial findings on diverse learning methods applied to various problems, offering support through empirical studies, theoretical analysis, or connections to psychological phenomena. It demonstrates the application of learning methods to solve significant problems and aims to enhance the conduct of machine learning research with a focus on verifiable and replicable evidence in published papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信