标准测量并不总是连续的:逻辑回归的后果效度比

Yixiao Dong, Kushmakar Baral, Denis Dumas
{"title":"标准测量并不总是连续的:逻辑回归的后果效度比","authors":"Yixiao Dong, Kushmakar Baral, Denis Dumas","doi":"10.1080/00220973.2024.2369333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neither the theoretical conceptualization of validity, validation methodologies, nor the relative importance of different aspects of validity in measure development, is static over time. With the e...","PeriodicalId":501538,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criterion Measures Are Not Always Continuous: Consequential Validity Ratio for Logistic Regression\",\"authors\":\"Yixiao Dong, Kushmakar Baral, Denis Dumas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220973.2024.2369333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neither the theoretical conceptualization of validity, validation methodologies, nor the relative importance of different aspects of validity in measure development, is static over time. With the e...\",\"PeriodicalId\":501538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Experimental Education\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Experimental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2024.2369333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2024.2369333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无论是效度的理论概念、验证方法,还是效度的不同方面在测量开发中的相对重要性,都不是一成不变的。随着时代的变迁,...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Criterion Measures Are Not Always Continuous: Consequential Validity Ratio for Logistic Regression
Neither the theoretical conceptualization of validity, validation methodologies, nor the relative importance of different aspects of validity in measure development, is static over time. With the e...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信