Jianxin Guo, Haifeng He, Guangmao Xie, Le Tao, Xi Mai, Kongyang Zhu, Qiusheng Qin, Xiaomin Yang, Ying Xie, Rui Wang, Hao Ma, Jing Zhao, Dawei Li, Shiyang Gong, Chuan-Chao Wang
{"title":"从古基因组推断广西洞穴埋葬和苗族-苗族人群的遗传亲缘关系","authors":"Jianxin Guo, Haifeng He, Guangmao Xie, Le Tao, Xi Mai, Kongyang Zhu, Qiusheng Qin, Xiaomin Yang, Ying Xie, Rui Wang, Hao Ma, Jing Zhao, Dawei Li, Shiyang Gong, Chuan-Chao Wang","doi":"10.1007/s12520-024-02033-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cave burial has been prevalent in southern China for thousands of years since the Shang and Zhou Dynasties (3600 − 2200 BP). The population history and the genetic contribution of cave burial groups to the formation of present-day southern minorities are largely unknown due to the lack of ancient genomic data. Here, we present the genomic data from four ancient individuals from cave burial sites Baitaishan and Huatudong from the Late Yuan to Ming Dynasties (650 − 300 BP) in Guangxi. We observed a close genetic affinity between the four individuals and published contemporaneous cave burial samples. However, our studied individuals received gene flows from northern East Asians compared to the cave burial groups around 1600 − 1400 years ago. We identified a strong genetic link between these ancient cave burial groups and present-day Hmong-Mien-speaking populations, particularly the geographically adjacent Baiku Yao population, indicating population stability in the mountainous region of southern China over the past few centuries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"16 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic affinity of cave burial and Hmong-Mien populations in Guangxi inferred from ancient genomes\",\"authors\":\"Jianxin Guo, Haifeng He, Guangmao Xie, Le Tao, Xi Mai, Kongyang Zhu, Qiusheng Qin, Xiaomin Yang, Ying Xie, Rui Wang, Hao Ma, Jing Zhao, Dawei Li, Shiyang Gong, Chuan-Chao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12520-024-02033-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cave burial has been prevalent in southern China for thousands of years since the Shang and Zhou Dynasties (3600 − 2200 BP). The population history and the genetic contribution of cave burial groups to the formation of present-day southern minorities are largely unknown due to the lack of ancient genomic data. Here, we present the genomic data from four ancient individuals from cave burial sites Baitaishan and Huatudong from the Late Yuan to Ming Dynasties (650 − 300 BP) in Guangxi. We observed a close genetic affinity between the four individuals and published contemporaneous cave burial samples. However, our studied individuals received gene flows from northern East Asians compared to the cave burial groups around 1600 − 1400 years ago. We identified a strong genetic link between these ancient cave burial groups and present-day Hmong-Mien-speaking populations, particularly the geographically adjacent Baiku Yao population, indicating population stability in the mountainous region of southern China over the past few centuries.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"16 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-024-02033-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-024-02033-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genetic affinity of cave burial and Hmong-Mien populations in Guangxi inferred from ancient genomes
Cave burial has been prevalent in southern China for thousands of years since the Shang and Zhou Dynasties (3600 − 2200 BP). The population history and the genetic contribution of cave burial groups to the formation of present-day southern minorities are largely unknown due to the lack of ancient genomic data. Here, we present the genomic data from four ancient individuals from cave burial sites Baitaishan and Huatudong from the Late Yuan to Ming Dynasties (650 − 300 BP) in Guangxi. We observed a close genetic affinity between the four individuals and published contemporaneous cave burial samples. However, our studied individuals received gene flows from northern East Asians compared to the cave burial groups around 1600 − 1400 years ago. We identified a strong genetic link between these ancient cave burial groups and present-day Hmong-Mien-speaking populations, particularly the geographically adjacent Baiku Yao population, indicating population stability in the mountainous region of southern China over the past few centuries.
期刊介绍:
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research.
Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science.
The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).