{"title":"探索混合式计算机科学教育中社会心理学习环境和教学模式对学习成绩的影响","authors":"Shonn Cheng, Hsuan-Pu Chang, Sheng-Shiang Tseng","doi":"10.1007/s10212-024-00884-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The goal of the present study was to explore the relations among perceived psychosocial learning environments, instructional modality, motivation, self-regulated learning, and academic achievement in blended computer science education. The participants were 207 undergraduate students enrolled in a blended online and face-to-face design course. We employed exploratory structural equation modeling to analyze the data. Our findings indicated that within the perceived psychosocial learning environments, dimensions such as personal relevance, authentic learning, and active learning significantly predicted various motivational beliefs. Furthermore, active learning and expectancy were strong predictors of effective time management, while instructional modality and emotional cost were closely linked to academic procrastination. Notably, academic procrastination emerged as the sole significant predictor of academic achievement, measured by course grades. These results suggest that traditional curricula emphasizing textbook reading and code memorization may be ineffective in teaching computer science. Additionally, our study highlights a higher tendency for procrastination in online settings. We recommend a curriculum focused on personal relevance, authentic learning, and active learning to better motivate students and enhance their ability to manage their learning effectively. To improve academic achievement in computer science education, it is crucial to address maladaptive self-regulatory processes and motivational beliefs, which primarily arise from active learning and instructional modality. We will conclude with specific recommendations for designing learning environments that better support computer science education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47800,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychology of Education","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the impact of psychosocial learning environments and instructional modalities on academic achievement in blended computer science education\",\"authors\":\"Shonn Cheng, Hsuan-Pu Chang, Sheng-Shiang Tseng\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10212-024-00884-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The goal of the present study was to explore the relations among perceived psychosocial learning environments, instructional modality, motivation, self-regulated learning, and academic achievement in blended computer science education. The participants were 207 undergraduate students enrolled in a blended online and face-to-face design course. We employed exploratory structural equation modeling to analyze the data. Our findings indicated that within the perceived psychosocial learning environments, dimensions such as personal relevance, authentic learning, and active learning significantly predicted various motivational beliefs. Furthermore, active learning and expectancy were strong predictors of effective time management, while instructional modality and emotional cost were closely linked to academic procrastination. Notably, academic procrastination emerged as the sole significant predictor of academic achievement, measured by course grades. These results suggest that traditional curricula emphasizing textbook reading and code memorization may be ineffective in teaching computer science. Additionally, our study highlights a higher tendency for procrastination in online settings. We recommend a curriculum focused on personal relevance, authentic learning, and active learning to better motivate students and enhance their ability to manage their learning effectively. To improve academic achievement in computer science education, it is crucial to address maladaptive self-regulatory processes and motivational beliefs, which primarily arise from active learning and instructional modality. We will conclude with specific recommendations for designing learning environments that better support computer science education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Psychology of Education\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Psychology of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00884-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00884-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the impact of psychosocial learning environments and instructional modalities on academic achievement in blended computer science education
The goal of the present study was to explore the relations among perceived psychosocial learning environments, instructional modality, motivation, self-regulated learning, and academic achievement in blended computer science education. The participants were 207 undergraduate students enrolled in a blended online and face-to-face design course. We employed exploratory structural equation modeling to analyze the data. Our findings indicated that within the perceived psychosocial learning environments, dimensions such as personal relevance, authentic learning, and active learning significantly predicted various motivational beliefs. Furthermore, active learning and expectancy were strong predictors of effective time management, while instructional modality and emotional cost were closely linked to academic procrastination. Notably, academic procrastination emerged as the sole significant predictor of academic achievement, measured by course grades. These results suggest that traditional curricula emphasizing textbook reading and code memorization may be ineffective in teaching computer science. Additionally, our study highlights a higher tendency for procrastination in online settings. We recommend a curriculum focused on personal relevance, authentic learning, and active learning to better motivate students and enhance their ability to manage their learning effectively. To improve academic achievement in computer science education, it is crucial to address maladaptive self-regulatory processes and motivational beliefs, which primarily arise from active learning and instructional modality. We will conclude with specific recommendations for designing learning environments that better support computer science education.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Psychology of Education (EJPE) is a quarterly journal oriented toward publishing high-quality papers that address the relevant psychological aspects of educational processes embedded in different institutional, social, and cultural contexts, and which focus on diversity in terms of the participants, their educational trajectories and their socio-cultural contexts. Authors are strongly encouraged to employ a variety of theoretical and methodological tools developed in the psychology of education in order to gain new insights by integrating different perspectives. Instead of reinforcing the divisions and distances between different communities stemming from their theoretical and methodological backgrounds, we would like to invite authors to engage with diverse theoretical and methodological tools in a meaningful way and to search for the new knowledge that can emerge from a combination of these tools. EJPE is open to all papers reflecting findings from original psychological studies on educational processes, as well as to exceptional theoretical and review papers that integrate current knowledge and chart new avenues for future research. Following the assumption that engaging with diversities creates great opportunities for new knowledge, the editorial team wishes to encourage, in particular, authors from less represented countries and regions, as well as young researchers, to submit their work and to keep going through the review process, which can be challenging, but which also presents opportunities for learning and inspiration.