重温广东话假名 keoi5 的复古观点

IF 0.2 3区文学 N/A ASIAN STUDIES

Journal of Chinese Linguistics Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1353/jcl.2017.a933425

Jackie Yan-Ki Lai, Lawrence Yam-Leung Cheung, Yenan Sun

{"title":"重温广东话假名 keoi5 的复古观点","authors":"Jackie Yan-Ki Lai, Lawrence Yam-Leung Cheung, Yenan Sun","doi":"10.1353/jcl.2017.a933425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article compares the resumptive and expletive views on an understudied use of the Cantonese pronoun keoi5. We demonstrate that the resumptive view as recently proposed in Yip and Ahenkorah (2022) raises a number of complications, and the so-called dummy keoi5 is better analyzed as a non-subject expletive, in line with traditional descriptions in Matthews and Yip (1994/2011).","PeriodicalId":44675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Resumptive View of the Cantonese Dummy keoi5 Revisited\",\"authors\":\"Jackie Yan-Ki Lai, Lawrence Yam-Leung Cheung, Yenan Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jcl.2017.a933425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article compares the resumptive and expletive views on an understudied use of the Cantonese pronoun keoi5. We demonstrate that the resumptive view as recently proposed in Yip and Ahenkorah (2022) raises a number of complications, and the so-called dummy keoi5 is better analyzed as a non-subject expletive, in line with traditional descriptions in Matthews and Yip (1994/2011).\",\"PeriodicalId\":44675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chinese Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chinese Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2017.a933425\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2017.a933425","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文就粤语代词 keoi5 的一种未被充分研究的用法，比较了祈使句和释义句的观点。我们证明，最近在 Yip 和 Ahenkorah（2022 年）中提出的祈使句观点会引起一些复杂问题，而所谓的假 keoi5 更适合分析为非主语的祈使句，这与 Matthews 和 Yip（1994/2011 年）中的传统描述一致。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Resumptive View of the Cantonese Dummy keoi5 Revisited

This article compares the resumptive and expletive views on an understudied use of the Cantonese pronoun keoi5. We demonstrate that the resumptive view as recently proposed in Yip and Ahenkorah (2022) raises a number of complications, and the so-called dummy keoi5 is better analyzed as a non-subject expletive, in line with traditional descriptions in Matthews and Yip (1994/2011).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Chinese Linguistics Multiple-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Journal of Chinese Linguistics (JCL) is an academic journal, which comprises research content from both general linguistics and Chinese linguistics. It is edited by a distinguished editorial board of international expertise. There are two publications: Journal of Chinese Linguistics (JCL) and Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series (JCLMS).