Carolyn Birdsall 的 Radiophilia(评论)

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Richard Legay
{"title":"Carolyn Birdsall 的 Radiophilia(评论)","authors":"Richard Legay","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Radiophilia</em> by Carolyn Birdsall <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Richard Legay (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Radiophilia</em><br/> By Carolyn Birdsall. New York: Bloomsbury, 2023. Pp. 279. <p>Just in time to mark radio’s first century in many countries, Carolyn Birdsall’s <em>Radiophilia</em> is a particularly welcome and original addition to the scholarship of both radio studies and broadcasting history. This ambitious book introduces a new concept, “radiophilia,” understood as the attachment to or love for radio, and goes on to successfully unravel its various constitutive elements from the early days of the wireless to today, in multiple geographical contexts.</p> <p>To undertake this task, the book often balances between overarching questions and concrete examples and is split into four chapters, simply named “Loving,” “Knowing,” “Saving,” and “Sharing.” This rather unusual approach of one-word progressive verbs as chapter titles is actually an excellent way for Birdsall to explicate her concept, as she can focus on what ties people (i.e., practices and emotions) to the medium over time. In the first pages, the attention is put on loving radio, both as action and practice, concerning individuals and groups. This is analyzed first in a historical manner, showing various forms of radiophilia over time, then through the lens of history of emotions, and finally in a multisensory and multimedia dimension. The book then moves on to the topic of knowing radio, shedding light on knowledge production as radiophilia. This chapter includes the communities formed around this technical hobby in the early days of radio, the importance of regulators and the industry, and the relationship between knowledge and affect, especially present with fan culture. In “Saving,” the author delves into the various shapes taken by radiophiliacs to preserve and hang on to the ephemeral sounds of the medium. Interestingly, this chapter includes amateur and professional actors as well as analogue and digital practices, revealing the width of the topic. The fourth chapter explores the issue of how enthusiasts have shared their love of radio over the last century. The net cast to catch the heterogeneity of this question is wide as individual, local, and national activities, practices, objects, spaces, and curatorial choices are all included. Overall, the author successfully balances an ambitious new and overarching concept with more concrete examples, and by doing so brings in a wide range of geographical and historical contexts, which makes the result particularly convincing. Interestingly, the author’s personal attachment to radio is also discussed on a few occasions in the book, which helps with understanding her perspective on the topic at hand and will likely echo many readers’ own relationship with radio. <strong>[End Page 1037]</strong></p> <p>In regard to the book’s contribution to the existing scholarship, a few points should be raised. First and foremost is the author’s unquestionable knowledge and mastery of the scientific literature on the topic at hand. Indeed, the book builds on an extensive range of publications from various fields, including history, radio and media studies, history of technology, and history of emotions, but also fan studies. In addition to in-depth theoretical discussions, numerous examples are included that cover many regions of the world; a predominance of publications in English is noticeable, which is, however, an issue inherent to the topic. Therefore, this book not only builds on the existing scholarship, it also directly contributes to it in an innovative way by introducing this new concept of radiophilia. There is little doubt that it will be of use to many scholars, as anyone who has worked on radio—this review’s author included—will have been confronted, and maybe affected, by a form of radiophilia. In this regard, <em>Radiophilia</em> might echo Marine Beccarelli’s <em>Micros de nuit</em> (2021), a study of nighttime radio in France and its particular intimate relationship with its listeners, and Sean Street’s <em>Radio Waves</em> (2004), in which the scholar and poet celebrates his love of radio. More specifically, the analysis of radio preservation detailed in the third chapter is especially relevant for readers interested in the medium’s history, as it provides a critical perspective and potential contextualization on the ways the sources they work with have been saved. In addition to the new insights brought to radio studies and broadcasting history...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiophilia by Carolyn Birdsall (review)\",\"authors\":\"Richard Legay\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tech.2024.a933125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Radiophilia</em> by Carolyn Birdsall <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Richard Legay (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Radiophilia</em><br/> By Carolyn Birdsall. New York: Bloomsbury, 2023. Pp. 279. <p>Just in time to mark radio’s first century in many countries, Carolyn Birdsall’s <em>Radiophilia</em> is a particularly welcome and original addition to the scholarship of both radio studies and broadcasting history. This ambitious book introduces a new concept, “radiophilia,” understood as the attachment to or love for radio, and goes on to successfully unravel its various constitutive elements from the early days of the wireless to today, in multiple geographical contexts.</p> <p>To undertake this task, the book often balances between overarching questions and concrete examples and is split into four chapters, simply named “Loving,” “Knowing,” “Saving,” and “Sharing.” This rather unusual approach of one-word progressive verbs as chapter titles is actually an excellent way for Birdsall to explicate her concept, as she can focus on what ties people (i.e., practices and emotions) to the medium over time. In the first pages, the attention is put on loving radio, both as action and practice, concerning individuals and groups. This is analyzed first in a historical manner, showing various forms of radiophilia over time, then through the lens of history of emotions, and finally in a multisensory and multimedia dimension. The book then moves on to the topic of knowing radio, shedding light on knowledge production as radiophilia. This chapter includes the communities formed around this technical hobby in the early days of radio, the importance of regulators and the industry, and the relationship between knowledge and affect, especially present with fan culture. In “Saving,” the author delves into the various shapes taken by radiophiliacs to preserve and hang on to the ephemeral sounds of the medium. Interestingly, this chapter includes amateur and professional actors as well as analogue and digital practices, revealing the width of the topic. The fourth chapter explores the issue of how enthusiasts have shared their love of radio over the last century. The net cast to catch the heterogeneity of this question is wide as individual, local, and national activities, practices, objects, spaces, and curatorial choices are all included. Overall, the author successfully balances an ambitious new and overarching concept with more concrete examples, and by doing so brings in a wide range of geographical and historical contexts, which makes the result particularly convincing. Interestingly, the author’s personal attachment to radio is also discussed on a few occasions in the book, which helps with understanding her perspective on the topic at hand and will likely echo many readers’ own relationship with radio. <strong>[End Page 1037]</strong></p> <p>In regard to the book’s contribution to the existing scholarship, a few points should be raised. First and foremost is the author’s unquestionable knowledge and mastery of the scientific literature on the topic at hand. Indeed, the book builds on an extensive range of publications from various fields, including history, radio and media studies, history of technology, and history of emotions, but also fan studies. In addition to in-depth theoretical discussions, numerous examples are included that cover many regions of the world; a predominance of publications in English is noticeable, which is, however, an issue inherent to the topic. Therefore, this book not only builds on the existing scholarship, it also directly contributes to it in an innovative way by introducing this new concept of radiophilia. There is little doubt that it will be of use to many scholars, as anyone who has worked on radio—this review’s author included—will have been confronted, and maybe affected, by a form of radiophilia. In this regard, <em>Radiophilia</em> might echo Marine Beccarelli’s <em>Micros de nuit</em> (2021), a study of nighttime radio in France and its particular intimate relationship with its listeners, and Sean Street’s <em>Radio Waves</em> (2004), in which the scholar and poet celebrates his love of radio. More specifically, the analysis of radio preservation detailed in the third chapter is especially relevant for readers interested in the medium’s history, as it provides a critical perspective and potential contextualization on the ways the sources they work with have been saved. In addition to the new insights brought to radio studies and broadcasting history...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933125\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评论者 Radiophilia by Carolyn Birdsall Richard Legay (bio) Radiophilia By Carolyn Birdsall.纽约:布鲁姆斯伯里出版社,2023 年。第 279 页。Carolyn Birdsall 的这本《Radiophilia》正好赶上了无线电在许多国家的第一个世纪,是无线电研究和广播史学术领域特别受欢迎的原创性补充。这本雄心勃勃的著作提出了一个新概念--"radiophilia",即对广播的依恋或热爱,并成功地揭示了从早期无线广播时代到今天,在不同地域背景下的各种构成要素。为了完成这项任务,该书经常在总体问题和具体实例之间取得平衡,并分为四章,分别命名为 "热爱"、"了解"、"拯救 "和 "分享"。伯德索尔以单字渐进动词作为章节标题,这种颇不寻常的做法实际上是阐释其概念的绝佳方式,因为她可以将重点放在随着时间的推移,是什么将人们(即实践和情感)与媒介联系在一起。在前几页中,重点放在了对广播的热爱上,无论是作为行动还是实践,都与个人和群体有关。首先以历史的方式进行分析,展示了随着时间推移出现的各种形式的恋电台行为,然后从情感史的角度进行分析,最后从多感官和多媒体的维度进行分析。然后,本书转向 "了解无线电 "这一主题,揭示了作为 "无线电嗜好 "的知识生产。这一章包括广播早期围绕这一技术爱好形成的社区、监管机构和行业的重要性,以及知识与情感之间的关系,尤其是粉丝文化。在 "保存 "一章中,作者深入探讨了无线电爱好者为保存和坚持这一媒介短暂的声音而采取的各种形式。有趣的是,这一章包括了业余和专业演员,以及模拟和数字实践,揭示了这一主题的广泛性。第四章探讨了过去一个世纪中爱好者如何分享他们对无线电的热爱。该书网罗广泛,涵盖了个人、地方和国家的活动、实践、物品、空间和策展选择,从而捕捉到了这一问题的异质性。总之,作者成功地平衡了一个雄心勃勃的全新总体概念和更具体的实例,并由此引入了广泛的地理和历史背景,使其成果特别具有说服力。有趣的是,书中还多次谈到作者个人对无线电的感情,这有助于理解她对当前主题的看法,也可能与许多读者自己与无线电的关系相呼应。[关于本书对现有学术研究的贡献,有几点值得一提。首先,也是最重要的一点是,作者对有关这一主题的科学文献的了解和掌握是毋庸置疑的。事实上,该书建立在各领域广泛的出版物基础之上,包括历史、广播与媒体研究、技术史、情感史以及粉丝研究。除了深入的理论探讨外,书中还收录了涵盖世界许多地区的大量实例;英文出版物占主导地位的现象十分明显,但这也是该主题所固有的问题。因此,本书不仅建立在现有学术成果的基础上,还通过引入 "radiophilia "这一新概念,以创新的方式对现有学术成果做出了直接贡献。毫无疑问,这本书对许多学者都会有帮助,因为任何从事过广播工作的人--包括这篇评论的作者--都会遇到过某种形式的 "恋电台癖",也许还会受到它的影响。在这方面,《Radiophilia》可能与 Marine Beccarelli 的《Micros de nuit》(2021 年)和 Sean Street 的《Radio Waves》(2004 年)有异曲同工之妙,前者是对法国夜间广播及其与听众之间特殊亲密关系的研究,后者是对学者兼诗人对广播的热爱的颂扬。更具体地说,第三章中详述的对广播保存的分析对于对广播媒体历史感兴趣的读者尤为重要,因为它提供了一个批判性的视角,并对他们所使用的资料的保存方式进行了潜在的背景分析。除了为广播研究和广播史带来新的见解之外...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiophilia by Carolyn Birdsall (review)

Reviewed by:

  • Radiophilia by Carolyn Birdsall
  • Richard Legay (bio)
Radiophilia
By Carolyn Birdsall. New York: Bloomsbury, 2023. Pp. 279.

Just in time to mark radio’s first century in many countries, Carolyn Birdsall’s Radiophilia is a particularly welcome and original addition to the scholarship of both radio studies and broadcasting history. This ambitious book introduces a new concept, “radiophilia,” understood as the attachment to or love for radio, and goes on to successfully unravel its various constitutive elements from the early days of the wireless to today, in multiple geographical contexts.

To undertake this task, the book often balances between overarching questions and concrete examples and is split into four chapters, simply named “Loving,” “Knowing,” “Saving,” and “Sharing.” This rather unusual approach of one-word progressive verbs as chapter titles is actually an excellent way for Birdsall to explicate her concept, as she can focus on what ties people (i.e., practices and emotions) to the medium over time. In the first pages, the attention is put on loving radio, both as action and practice, concerning individuals and groups. This is analyzed first in a historical manner, showing various forms of radiophilia over time, then through the lens of history of emotions, and finally in a multisensory and multimedia dimension. The book then moves on to the topic of knowing radio, shedding light on knowledge production as radiophilia. This chapter includes the communities formed around this technical hobby in the early days of radio, the importance of regulators and the industry, and the relationship between knowledge and affect, especially present with fan culture. In “Saving,” the author delves into the various shapes taken by radiophiliacs to preserve and hang on to the ephemeral sounds of the medium. Interestingly, this chapter includes amateur and professional actors as well as analogue and digital practices, revealing the width of the topic. The fourth chapter explores the issue of how enthusiasts have shared their love of radio over the last century. The net cast to catch the heterogeneity of this question is wide as individual, local, and national activities, practices, objects, spaces, and curatorial choices are all included. Overall, the author successfully balances an ambitious new and overarching concept with more concrete examples, and by doing so brings in a wide range of geographical and historical contexts, which makes the result particularly convincing. Interestingly, the author’s personal attachment to radio is also discussed on a few occasions in the book, which helps with understanding her perspective on the topic at hand and will likely echo many readers’ own relationship with radio. [End Page 1037]

In regard to the book’s contribution to the existing scholarship, a few points should be raised. First and foremost is the author’s unquestionable knowledge and mastery of the scientific literature on the topic at hand. Indeed, the book builds on an extensive range of publications from various fields, including history, radio and media studies, history of technology, and history of emotions, but also fan studies. In addition to in-depth theoretical discussions, numerous examples are included that cover many regions of the world; a predominance of publications in English is noticeable, which is, however, an issue inherent to the topic. Therefore, this book not only builds on the existing scholarship, it also directly contributes to it in an innovative way by introducing this new concept of radiophilia. There is little doubt that it will be of use to many scholars, as anyone who has worked on radio—this review’s author included—will have been confronted, and maybe affected, by a form of radiophilia. In this regard, Radiophilia might echo Marine Beccarelli’s Micros de nuit (2021), a study of nighttime radio in France and its particular intimate relationship with its listeners, and Sean Street’s Radio Waves (2004), in which the scholar and poet celebrates his love of radio. More specifically, the analysis of radio preservation detailed in the third chapter is especially relevant for readers interested in the medium’s history, as it provides a critical perspective and potential contextualization on the ways the sources they work with have been saved. In addition to the new insights brought to radio studies and broadcasting history...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Culture
Technology and Culture 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Culture, the preeminent journal of the history of technology, draws on scholarship in diverse disciplines to publish insightful pieces intended for general readers as well as specialists. Subscribers include scientists, engineers, anthropologists, sociologists, economists, museum curators, archivists, scholars, librarians, educators, historians, and many others. In addition to scholarly essays, each issue features 30-40 book reviews and reviews of new museum exhibitions. To illuminate important debates and draw attention to specific topics, the journal occasionally publishes thematic issues. Technology and Culture is the official journal of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信