媒体废墟:Margaret Jack 著的《柬埔寨战后媒体重建与技术地缘政治》(评论)

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Peter Manning
{"title":"媒体废墟:Margaret Jack 著的《柬埔寨战后媒体重建与技术地缘政治》(评论)","authors":"Peter Manning","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Media Ruins: Cambodian Postwar Media Reconstruction and the Geopolitics of Technology</em> by Margaret Jack <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Peter Manning (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Media Ruins: Cambodian Postwar Media Reconstruction and the Geopolitics of Technology</em><br/> By Margaret Jack. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2023. Pp. 264. <p>It is still common today for news coverage, film, and much human rights scholarship to depict Cambodia as a broken, corrupt, authoritarian, violent, dysfunctional, and amnesiac cultural and political space. Such tropes risk the reproduction of pathologizing and flattening representations of Cambodia that present a helpless country whose postgenocide present is inescapably defined and trapped by its own violent history. In <em>Media Ruins</em>, Margaret Jack offers an important corrective to these tendencies by developing a historical account of the material relations within and with media infrastructures across Cambodia’s multiple historical transitions and conflicts. Jack does so with an emphasis on contingency, a commitment to nuance in her reading of the histories of Cambodia’s media architecture, and a strong sense of relational Cambodian agency within these accounts.</p> <p><em>Media Ruins</em> speaks across disciplinary audiences. The book places histories of material media infrastructures in Cambodia into dialogue with themes in memory studies, postconflict and peacebuilding responses, and more orthodox histories of Cambodia’s recovery from the Khmer Rouge genocide (1975–79). Readers with a background in memory studies are asked to take seriously the role of material objects and artifacts within processes of both memory and forgetting—including transmitters, radios, projectors, film reels, <strong>[End Page 1017]</strong> and the audiovisual (representational) content disseminated through them. For readers with a background in human rights, peacebuilding, or transitional justice, <em>Media Ruins</em> asks us to think through processes of social and cultural transition from violence away from more conventional institutional spaces, such as the ballot box or courtroom. For area studies readers, or those interested in more disciplinary histories of Cambodia, <em>Media Ruins</em> develops several important new angles on the histories of political control and contestation during Cambodia’s prewar and postgenocide periods. Jack adeptly situates the material architecture of media within these stories as sites that are both constituted by and deeply constitutive of their historical contexts.</p> <p>Reading <em>Media Ruins</em>, two important concepts developed by Jack tend to stay with you. The work of “infrastructural restitution” is the signature concept running throughout the text. By this, Jack refers to the creative practices that seek to restore and reconstruct media artifacts and infrastructures. This work is undertaken by a range of actors. Some are themselves survivors of the Khmer Rouge regime, but many are young and occupy uneasy relations to their own family (and national) histories as members of a “postmemory” generation (as M. Hirsch calls it in “The Generation of Postmemory,” 2008). Such younger Cambodians live amid the material traces and imprints of both the legacies of past violence and, often jarringly, the tumultuous changes to the built landscape that Cambodia has experienced in recent decades. Through interviews and immersive methods around screenings and conservation efforts, Jack shows the work of infrastructural restitution to be affecting and affective; melancholic and yet cathartic; politically constrained and yet furnishing a subtle counterpolitics to contemporary authoritarianisms. The restoration of old prewar media artifacts represents an “emotional access point” (p. 150) to the past, where media content and form become inseparable as they operate as commemorative devices. A second, more narrowly applied concept that demonstrates the deep ambivalences in this work is developed through observations of “disintegration noise” (p. 135). By this, Jack calls attention to the processes of physical decay at work that afflict the material copies of (restored) media. This noise is manifest in gaps, lapses, or distortions that simultaneously demonstrate and rescue an authentic past but also signal its absence and loss. Throughout the text, Jack is quick to note that these fragments of memory often offer fragments of a historical picture that itself also glosses over past social inequalities and antagonisms.</p> <p>The intent and contribution of <em>Media Ruins</em> is perhaps best captured in Jack’s account of one particular screening. A restored film from prewar 1960s Cambodia was to be shown, but the slow decay of the original physical reels meant that it could not be fully recovered in its entire sequence. It was...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Media Ruins: Cambodian Postwar Media Reconstruction and the Geopolitics of Technology by Margaret Jack (review)\",\"authors\":\"Peter Manning\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tech.2024.a933115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Media Ruins: Cambodian Postwar Media Reconstruction and the Geopolitics of Technology</em> by Margaret Jack <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Peter Manning (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Media Ruins: Cambodian Postwar Media Reconstruction and the Geopolitics of Technology</em><br/> By Margaret Jack. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2023. Pp. 264. <p>It is still common today for news coverage, film, and much human rights scholarship to depict Cambodia as a broken, corrupt, authoritarian, violent, dysfunctional, and amnesiac cultural and political space. Such tropes risk the reproduction of pathologizing and flattening representations of Cambodia that present a helpless country whose postgenocide present is inescapably defined and trapped by its own violent history. In <em>Media Ruins</em>, Margaret Jack offers an important corrective to these tendencies by developing a historical account of the material relations within and with media infrastructures across Cambodia’s multiple historical transitions and conflicts. Jack does so with an emphasis on contingency, a commitment to nuance in her reading of the histories of Cambodia’s media architecture, and a strong sense of relational Cambodian agency within these accounts.</p> <p><em>Media Ruins</em> speaks across disciplinary audiences. The book places histories of material media infrastructures in Cambodia into dialogue with themes in memory studies, postconflict and peacebuilding responses, and more orthodox histories of Cambodia’s recovery from the Khmer Rouge genocide (1975–79). Readers with a background in memory studies are asked to take seriously the role of material objects and artifacts within processes of both memory and forgetting—including transmitters, radios, projectors, film reels, <strong>[End Page 1017]</strong> and the audiovisual (representational) content disseminated through them. For readers with a background in human rights, peacebuilding, or transitional justice, <em>Media Ruins</em> asks us to think through processes of social and cultural transition from violence away from more conventional institutional spaces, such as the ballot box or courtroom. For area studies readers, or those interested in more disciplinary histories of Cambodia, <em>Media Ruins</em> develops several important new angles on the histories of political control and contestation during Cambodia’s prewar and postgenocide periods. Jack adeptly situates the material architecture of media within these stories as sites that are both constituted by and deeply constitutive of their historical contexts.</p> <p>Reading <em>Media Ruins</em>, two important concepts developed by Jack tend to stay with you. The work of “infrastructural restitution” is the signature concept running throughout the text. By this, Jack refers to the creative practices that seek to restore and reconstruct media artifacts and infrastructures. This work is undertaken by a range of actors. Some are themselves survivors of the Khmer Rouge regime, but many are young and occupy uneasy relations to their own family (and national) histories as members of a “postmemory” generation (as M. Hirsch calls it in “The Generation of Postmemory,” 2008). Such younger Cambodians live amid the material traces and imprints of both the legacies of past violence and, often jarringly, the tumultuous changes to the built landscape that Cambodia has experienced in recent decades. Through interviews and immersive methods around screenings and conservation efforts, Jack shows the work of infrastructural restitution to be affecting and affective; melancholic and yet cathartic; politically constrained and yet furnishing a subtle counterpolitics to contemporary authoritarianisms. The restoration of old prewar media artifacts represents an “emotional access point” (p. 150) to the past, where media content and form become inseparable as they operate as commemorative devices. A second, more narrowly applied concept that demonstrates the deep ambivalences in this work is developed through observations of “disintegration noise” (p. 135). By this, Jack calls attention to the processes of physical decay at work that afflict the material copies of (restored) media. This noise is manifest in gaps, lapses, or distortions that simultaneously demonstrate and rescue an authentic past but also signal its absence and loss. Throughout the text, Jack is quick to note that these fragments of memory often offer fragments of a historical picture that itself also glosses over past social inequalities and antagonisms.</p> <p>The intent and contribution of <em>Media Ruins</em> is perhaps best captured in Jack’s account of one particular screening. A restored film from prewar 1960s Cambodia was to be shown, but the slow decay of the original physical reels meant that it could not be fully recovered in its entire sequence. It was...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933115\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评论者: 媒体废墟:玛格丽特-杰克-彼得-曼宁(Margaret Jack Peter Manning)(简历)《媒体废墟:柬埔寨战后媒体重建与技术地缘政治》:媒体废墟:柬埔寨战后媒体重建与技术地缘政治》,玛格丽特-杰克著。马萨诸塞州剑桥市:麻省理工学院出版社,2023 年。第 264 页。今天,新闻报道、电影和许多人权学术研究仍然普遍将柬埔寨描述为一个破碎、腐败、专制、暴力、功能失调和失忆的文化和政治空间。这样的描述有可能使柬埔寨病态化、扁平化的形象再现,使人们看到一个无助的国家,其种族灭绝后的现状不可避免地被其自身的暴力历史所定义和困住。在《媒体废墟》一书中,玛格丽特-杰克(Margaret Jack)对柬埔寨多重历史转型和冲突中媒体基础设施内部以及与媒体基础设施之间的物质关系进行了历史性描述,从而对这些倾向做出了重要的纠正。杰克强调偶然性,致力于对柬埔寨媒体架构历史进行细致入微的解读,并在这些论述中体现出强烈的柬埔寨代理关系意识。媒体废墟》的读者遍及各个学科。该书将柬埔寨物质媒体基础设施的历史与记忆研究、冲突后与和平建设对策等主题,以及柬埔寨从红色高棉种族灭绝(1975-79 年)中恢复的正统历史进行了对话。具有记忆研究背景的读者需要认真对待物质物品和人工制品在记忆和遗忘过程中的作用,包括发射机、收音机、放映机、电影胶片以及通过它们传播的视听(表象)内容。对于具有人权、和平建设或过渡时期司法背景的读者来说,《媒体废墟》要求我们思考社会和文化从暴力过渡到远离更传统的制度空间(如投票箱或法庭)的过程。对于地区研究读者或对柬埔寨学科史感兴趣的读者来说,《媒体废墟》从几个重要的新角度探讨了柬埔寨战前和种族灭绝后时期的政治控制和争论史。杰克巧妙地将这些故事中的媒体物质结构定位为既由历史背景构成,又深刻地构成其历史背景的场所。阅读《媒体废墟》,杰克提出的两个重要概念往往会让你记忆犹新。基础设施复原 "是贯穿全文的标志性概念。在这里,杰克指的是试图恢复和重建媒体艺术品和基础设施的创造性实践。这项工作由一系列参与者进行。其中一些人本身就是红色高棉政权的幸存者,但许多人都很年轻,作为 "后记忆 "一代(M. Hirsch 在《后记忆的一代》(The Generation of Postmemory)一书中称之为 "后记忆 "一代,2008 年)的成员,他们与自己的家族(和国家)历史之间的关系并不和谐。这些年轻的柬埔寨人生活在过去暴力遗留下来的物质痕迹和印记之中,而柬埔寨近几十年来所经历的建筑景观的动荡变化也常常令人震惊。通过采访以及围绕放映和保护工作的沉浸式方法,杰克展示了基础设施修复工作的影响力和感染力;忧郁而又宣泄;政治上受到限制,但又为当代专制主义提供了一种微妙的反政治。战前旧媒体文物的修复代表了通往过去的 "情感入口"(第 150 页),媒体的内容和形式因其作为纪念装置的运作而变得密不可分。第二个应用范围更窄的概念是通过对 "解体噪音"(第 135 页)的观察而形成的,它展示了这一作品中深刻的矛盾心理。通过这一概念,杰克呼吁人们关注影响(修复的)媒体物质副本的物理衰变过程。这种噪音表现为间隙、空白或扭曲,它们同时展示并拯救了真实的过去,但也预示着它的缺失和消失。纵观全文,杰克很快注意到,这些记忆片段往往是历史画面的碎片,而历史画面本身也掩盖了过去的社会不平等和对立。媒体废墟》的意图和贡献也许可以从杰克对一次放映的描述中得到最好的体现。当时要放映的是一部 20 世纪 60 年代柬埔寨战前的修复电影,但由于原始胶片的损坏速度较慢,因此无法完全恢复电影的完整序列。这是...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Media Ruins: Cambodian Postwar Media Reconstruction and the Geopolitics of Technology by Margaret Jack (review)

Reviewed by:

  • Media Ruins: Cambodian Postwar Media Reconstruction and the Geopolitics of Technology by Margaret Jack
  • Peter Manning (bio)
Media Ruins: Cambodian Postwar Media Reconstruction and the Geopolitics of Technology
By Margaret Jack. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2023. Pp. 264.

It is still common today for news coverage, film, and much human rights scholarship to depict Cambodia as a broken, corrupt, authoritarian, violent, dysfunctional, and amnesiac cultural and political space. Such tropes risk the reproduction of pathologizing and flattening representations of Cambodia that present a helpless country whose postgenocide present is inescapably defined and trapped by its own violent history. In Media Ruins, Margaret Jack offers an important corrective to these tendencies by developing a historical account of the material relations within and with media infrastructures across Cambodia’s multiple historical transitions and conflicts. Jack does so with an emphasis on contingency, a commitment to nuance in her reading of the histories of Cambodia’s media architecture, and a strong sense of relational Cambodian agency within these accounts.

Media Ruins speaks across disciplinary audiences. The book places histories of material media infrastructures in Cambodia into dialogue with themes in memory studies, postconflict and peacebuilding responses, and more orthodox histories of Cambodia’s recovery from the Khmer Rouge genocide (1975–79). Readers with a background in memory studies are asked to take seriously the role of material objects and artifacts within processes of both memory and forgetting—including transmitters, radios, projectors, film reels, [End Page 1017] and the audiovisual (representational) content disseminated through them. For readers with a background in human rights, peacebuilding, or transitional justice, Media Ruins asks us to think through processes of social and cultural transition from violence away from more conventional institutional spaces, such as the ballot box or courtroom. For area studies readers, or those interested in more disciplinary histories of Cambodia, Media Ruins develops several important new angles on the histories of political control and contestation during Cambodia’s prewar and postgenocide periods. Jack adeptly situates the material architecture of media within these stories as sites that are both constituted by and deeply constitutive of their historical contexts.

Reading Media Ruins, two important concepts developed by Jack tend to stay with you. The work of “infrastructural restitution” is the signature concept running throughout the text. By this, Jack refers to the creative practices that seek to restore and reconstruct media artifacts and infrastructures. This work is undertaken by a range of actors. Some are themselves survivors of the Khmer Rouge regime, but many are young and occupy uneasy relations to their own family (and national) histories as members of a “postmemory” generation (as M. Hirsch calls it in “The Generation of Postmemory,” 2008). Such younger Cambodians live amid the material traces and imprints of both the legacies of past violence and, often jarringly, the tumultuous changes to the built landscape that Cambodia has experienced in recent decades. Through interviews and immersive methods around screenings and conservation efforts, Jack shows the work of infrastructural restitution to be affecting and affective; melancholic and yet cathartic; politically constrained and yet furnishing a subtle counterpolitics to contemporary authoritarianisms. The restoration of old prewar media artifacts represents an “emotional access point” (p. 150) to the past, where media content and form become inseparable as they operate as commemorative devices. A second, more narrowly applied concept that demonstrates the deep ambivalences in this work is developed through observations of “disintegration noise” (p. 135). By this, Jack calls attention to the processes of physical decay at work that afflict the material copies of (restored) media. This noise is manifest in gaps, lapses, or distortions that simultaneously demonstrate and rescue an authentic past but also signal its absence and loss. Throughout the text, Jack is quick to note that these fragments of memory often offer fragments of a historical picture that itself also glosses over past social inequalities and antagonisms.

The intent and contribution of Media Ruins is perhaps best captured in Jack’s account of one particular screening. A restored film from prewar 1960s Cambodia was to be shown, but the slow decay of the original physical reels meant that it could not be fully recovered in its entire sequence. It was...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Culture
Technology and Culture 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Culture, the preeminent journal of the history of technology, draws on scholarship in diverse disciplines to publish insightful pieces intended for general readers as well as specialists. Subscribers include scientists, engineers, anthropologists, sociologists, economists, museum curators, archivists, scholars, librarians, educators, historians, and many others. In addition to scholarly essays, each issue features 30-40 book reviews and reviews of new museum exhibitions. To illuminate important debates and draw attention to specific topics, the journal occasionally publishes thematic issues. Technology and Culture is the official journal of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信