应用脲酶抑制剂 N-(正丁基)硫代磷酸三酰胺 (NBPT) 作为缓解中国不同黄土中氨挥发的策略

IF 3.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Muneer Ahmed, Sajjad Raza, Ahmed Salah Elrys, Ming Lei, Zhujun Chen, Jianbin Zhou
{"title":"应用脲酶抑制剂 N-(正丁基)硫代磷酸三酰胺 (NBPT) 作为缓解中国不同黄土中氨挥发的策略","authors":"Muneer Ahmed, Sajjad Raza, Ahmed Salah Elrys, Ming Lei, Zhujun Chen, Jianbin Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s42729-024-01946-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>The use of urease inhibitors (UIs) has been proposed to reduce nitrogen (N) losses, including ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) volatilization from N fertilizers applied soils. However, the effects of soil properties on UIs efficiency for mitigating NH<sub>3</sub> emissions remains less clear.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>An incubation study was conducted, to evaluate the efficiency of urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) on NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization. The soils were used from six different counties (Zhouzhi, Yangling, Changwu, Luochuan, Ansai and Shenmu) of the Loess Plateau, China characterized different soil properties. The treatments were control (no N), urea (0.2 g N kg<sup>− 1</sup> soil) and urea + 0.5% NBPT.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The cumulative NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization loss in urea applied six different soils were 42.8–56.1 mg kg<sup>− 1</sup> (21.4–28.1% of N applied). The NH<sub>3</sub> emission rate rapidly increased in Shenmu, Ansai and Luochuan soils and recorded highest (28.1, 27.1 and 25.8% of N applied), probably due to more sand particles and higher soil pH. In contrast, Zhouzhi, Changwu and Yangling soils showed gradual increase in NH<sub>3</sub> emission rate and recorded lowest (21.4, 21.5 and 23.2% of N applied), might be due to more clay particles and low soil pH. Urea + 0.5% NBPT delayed urea hydrolysis and significantly reduced NH<sub>3</sub>-N loss by 47.1–55.5% in different soils. The soil texture, pH, urease activity (UA), calcium carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>) and organic matter content were the main soil factors affected the rate of NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization and NBPT effectiveness.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>This study validated that NBPT application has immense potential in mitigating NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization from different soils.</p>","PeriodicalId":17042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urease Inhibitor N-(n-butyl) Thiophosphoric Triamide (NBPT) Application as a Mitigating Strategy of Ammonia Volatilization from Different Loess Soils of China\",\"authors\":\"Muneer Ahmed, Sajjad Raza, Ahmed Salah Elrys, Ming Lei, Zhujun Chen, Jianbin Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42729-024-01946-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>The use of urease inhibitors (UIs) has been proposed to reduce nitrogen (N) losses, including ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) volatilization from N fertilizers applied soils. However, the effects of soil properties on UIs efficiency for mitigating NH<sub>3</sub> emissions remains less clear.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>An incubation study was conducted, to evaluate the efficiency of urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) on NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization. The soils were used from six different counties (Zhouzhi, Yangling, Changwu, Luochuan, Ansai and Shenmu) of the Loess Plateau, China characterized different soil properties. The treatments were control (no N), urea (0.2 g N kg<sup>− 1</sup> soil) and urea + 0.5% NBPT.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The cumulative NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization loss in urea applied six different soils were 42.8–56.1 mg kg<sup>− 1</sup> (21.4–28.1% of N applied). The NH<sub>3</sub> emission rate rapidly increased in Shenmu, Ansai and Luochuan soils and recorded highest (28.1, 27.1 and 25.8% of N applied), probably due to more sand particles and higher soil pH. In contrast, Zhouzhi, Changwu and Yangling soils showed gradual increase in NH<sub>3</sub> emission rate and recorded lowest (21.4, 21.5 and 23.2% of N applied), might be due to more clay particles and low soil pH. Urea + 0.5% NBPT delayed urea hydrolysis and significantly reduced NH<sub>3</sub>-N loss by 47.1–55.5% in different soils. The soil texture, pH, urease activity (UA), calcium carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>) and organic matter content were the main soil factors affected the rate of NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization and NBPT effectiveness.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>This study validated that NBPT application has immense potential in mitigating NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization from different soils.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01946-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01946-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的有人建议使用脲酶抑制剂(UIs)来减少氮(N)的损失,包括施用氮肥的土壤中氨(NH3)的挥发。方法进行了一项培养研究,以评估脲酶抑制剂 N-(正丁基)硫代磷酸三酰胺(NBPT)对 NH3 挥发的影响。土壤来自中国黄土高原的六个不同县(周至、杨凌、长武、洛川、安塞和神木),具有不同的土壤特性。施用尿素的六种不同土壤中,NH3 的累积挥发损失为 42.8-56.1 mg kg-1(占施用量的 21.4-28.1%)。神木、安塞和洛川土壤的 NH3 排放率迅速增加,最高(分别为施氮量的 28.1、27.1 和 25.8%),这可能是由于砂粒较多和土壤 pH 值较高所致。相比之下,周至、长武和杨凌土壤的 NH3 排放率逐渐增加,最低(分别为施氮量的 21.4%、21.5% 和 23.2%),这可能是由于粘粒较多和土壤 pH 值较低所致。尿素 + 0.5% NBPT 可延缓尿素水解,在不同土壤中可显著减少 47.1-55.5% 的 NH3-N 损失。土壤质地、pH 值、脲酶活性(UA)、碳酸钙(CaCO3)和有机质含量是影响 NH3 挥发率和 NBPT 效果的主要土壤因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Urease Inhibitor N-(n-butyl) Thiophosphoric Triamide (NBPT) Application as a Mitigating Strategy of Ammonia Volatilization from Different Loess Soils of China

Urease Inhibitor N-(n-butyl) Thiophosphoric Triamide (NBPT) Application as a Mitigating Strategy of Ammonia Volatilization from Different Loess Soils of China

Purpose

The use of urease inhibitors (UIs) has been proposed to reduce nitrogen (N) losses, including ammonia (NH3) volatilization from N fertilizers applied soils. However, the effects of soil properties on UIs efficiency for mitigating NH3 emissions remains less clear.

Methods

An incubation study was conducted, to evaluate the efficiency of urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) on NH3 volatilization. The soils were used from six different counties (Zhouzhi, Yangling, Changwu, Luochuan, Ansai and Shenmu) of the Loess Plateau, China characterized different soil properties. The treatments were control (no N), urea (0.2 g N kg− 1 soil) and urea + 0.5% NBPT.

Results

The cumulative NH3 volatilization loss in urea applied six different soils were 42.8–56.1 mg kg− 1 (21.4–28.1% of N applied). The NH3 emission rate rapidly increased in Shenmu, Ansai and Luochuan soils and recorded highest (28.1, 27.1 and 25.8% of N applied), probably due to more sand particles and higher soil pH. In contrast, Zhouzhi, Changwu and Yangling soils showed gradual increase in NH3 emission rate and recorded lowest (21.4, 21.5 and 23.2% of N applied), might be due to more clay particles and low soil pH. Urea + 0.5% NBPT delayed urea hydrolysis and significantly reduced NH3-N loss by 47.1–55.5% in different soils. The soil texture, pH, urease activity (UA), calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and organic matter content were the main soil factors affected the rate of NH3 volatilization and NBPT effectiveness.

Conclusion

This study validated that NBPT application has immense potential in mitigating NH3 volatilization from different soils.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
331
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition is an international, peer reviewed journal devoted to publishing original research findings in the areas of soil science, plant nutrition, agriculture and environmental science. Soil sciences submissions may cover physics, chemistry, biology, microbiology, mineralogy, ecology, pedology, soil classification and amelioration. Plant nutrition and agriculture submissions may include plant production, physiology and metabolism of plants, plant ecology, diversity and sustainability of agricultural systems, organic and inorganic fertilization in relation to their impact on yields, quality of plants and ecological systems, and agroecosystems studies. Submissions covering soil degradation, environmental pollution, nature conservation, and environmental protection are also welcome. The journal considers for publication original research articles, technical notes, short communication, and reviews (both voluntary and by invitation), and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信