专制国家与国际刑事法院:民间社会的参与、持不同政见的非政府组织和对正义的追求

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW
Kjersti Lohne
{"title":"专制国家与国际刑事法院:民间社会的参与、持不同政见的非政府组织和对正义的追求","authors":"Kjersti Lohne","doi":"10.1163/15718123-bja10200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The rising tide of autocratization does not bode well for the International Criminal Court (<span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">icc</span>), which has almost exclusively intervened in contexts of autocratic rule. As the Court is dependent not only on state cooperation but also on non-governmental organizations (<span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">ngo </span>s) for effectiveness and legitimacy, this article explores the role—if any—of <em>dissident</em> <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\"><em>ngo </em></span><em>s</em> in the pursuit of justice for international crimes committed under autocratic regimes. It shows that, while <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">ngo </span>s have been fundamental to the working of the <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">icc</span>, autocratic states are particularly challenging for the <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">icc</span> and <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">ngo </span>s to operate in. Despite this, <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">ngo </span>s may have found new ways of holding autocratic states to account for international crimes—with or without the <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">icc</span>.</p>","PeriodicalId":55966,"journal":{"name":"International Criminal Law Review","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autocracies and the International Criminal Court: Civil Society Engagement, Dissident ngo s, and the Pursuit of Justice\",\"authors\":\"Kjersti Lohne\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718123-bja10200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The rising tide of autocratization does not bode well for the International Criminal Court (<span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">icc</span>), which has almost exclusively intervened in contexts of autocratic rule. As the Court is dependent not only on state cooperation but also on non-governmental organizations (<span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">ngo </span>s) for effectiveness and legitimacy, this article explores the role—if any—of <em>dissident</em> <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\"><em>ngo </em></span><em>s</em> in the pursuit of justice for international crimes committed under autocratic regimes. It shows that, while <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">ngo </span>s have been fundamental to the working of the <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">icc</span>, autocratic states are particularly challenging for the <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">icc</span> and <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">ngo </span>s to operate in. Despite this, <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">ngo </span>s may have found new ways of holding autocratic states to account for international crimes—with or without the <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">icc</span>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Criminal Law Review\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Criminal Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Criminal Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

日益高涨的专制化浪潮对国际刑事法院(ICC)来说并非好兆头,因为该法院几乎只在专制统治的背景下进行干预。由于国际刑事法院的有效性和合法性不仅依赖于国家合作,也依赖于非政府组织(ngo s),本文探讨了持不同政见的非政府组织在为专制政权下犯下的国际罪行伸张正义方面的作用(如果有的话)。文章指出,尽管非政府组织对国际刑事法院的工作至关重要,但对于国际刑事法院和非政府组织而言,专制国家的运作尤其具有挑战性。尽管如此,非政府组织可能已经找到了让专制国家对国际罪行负责的新方法--无论是否有国际刑事法院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Autocracies and the International Criminal Court: Civil Society Engagement, Dissident ngo s, and the Pursuit of Justice

The rising tide of autocratization does not bode well for the International Criminal Court (icc), which has almost exclusively intervened in contexts of autocratic rule. As the Court is dependent not only on state cooperation but also on non-governmental organizations (ngo s) for effectiveness and legitimacy, this article explores the role—if any—of dissident ngo s in the pursuit of justice for international crimes committed under autocratic regimes. It shows that, while ngo s have been fundamental to the working of the icc, autocratic states are particularly challenging for the icc and ngo s to operate in. Despite this, ngo s may have found new ways of holding autocratic states to account for international crimes—with or without the icc.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Thus there is also a need for criminological, sociological and historical research on the issues of ICL. The Review publishes in-depth analytical research that deals with these issues. The analysis may cover: • the substantive and procedural law on the international level; • important cases from national jurisdictions which have a bearing on general issues; • criminological and sociological; and, • historical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信