{"title":"专制国家与国际刑事法院:民间社会的参与、持不同政见的非政府组织和对正义的追求","authors":"Kjersti Lohne","doi":"10.1163/15718123-bja10200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The rising tide of autocratization does not bode well for the International Criminal Court (<span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">icc</span>), which has almost exclusively intervened in contexts of autocratic rule. As the Court is dependent not only on state cooperation but also on non-governmental organizations (<span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">ngo </span>s) for effectiveness and legitimacy, this article explores the role—if any—of <em>dissident</em> <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\"><em>ngo </em></span><em>s</em> in the pursuit of justice for international crimes committed under autocratic regimes. It shows that, while <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">ngo </span>s have been fundamental to the working of the <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">icc</span>, autocratic states are particularly challenging for the <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">icc</span> and <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">ngo </span>s to operate in. Despite this, <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">ngo </span>s may have found new ways of holding autocratic states to account for international crimes—with or without the <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">icc</span>.</p>","PeriodicalId":55966,"journal":{"name":"International Criminal Law Review","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autocracies and the International Criminal Court: Civil Society Engagement, Dissident ngo s, and the Pursuit of Justice\",\"authors\":\"Kjersti Lohne\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718123-bja10200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The rising tide of autocratization does not bode well for the International Criminal Court (<span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">icc</span>), which has almost exclusively intervened in contexts of autocratic rule. As the Court is dependent not only on state cooperation but also on non-governmental organizations (<span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">ngo </span>s) for effectiveness and legitimacy, this article explores the role—if any—of <em>dissident</em> <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\"><em>ngo </em></span><em>s</em> in the pursuit of justice for international crimes committed under autocratic regimes. It shows that, while <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">ngo </span>s have been fundamental to the working of the <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">icc</span>, autocratic states are particularly challenging for the <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">icc</span> and <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">ngo </span>s to operate in. Despite this, <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">ngo </span>s may have found new ways of holding autocratic states to account for international crimes—with or without the <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">icc</span>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Criminal Law Review\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Criminal Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Criminal Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Autocracies and the International Criminal Court: Civil Society Engagement, Dissident ngo s, and the Pursuit of Justice
The rising tide of autocratization does not bode well for the International Criminal Court (icc), which has almost exclusively intervened in contexts of autocratic rule. As the Court is dependent not only on state cooperation but also on non-governmental organizations (ngo s) for effectiveness and legitimacy, this article explores the role—if any—of dissidentngo s in the pursuit of justice for international crimes committed under autocratic regimes. It shows that, while ngo s have been fundamental to the working of the icc, autocratic states are particularly challenging for the icc and ngo s to operate in. Despite this, ngo s may have found new ways of holding autocratic states to account for international crimes—with or without the icc.
期刊介绍:
Thus there is also a need for criminological, sociological and historical research on the issues of ICL. The Review publishes in-depth analytical research that deals with these issues. The analysis may cover: • the substantive and procedural law on the international level; • important cases from national jurisdictions which have a bearing on general issues; • criminological and sociological; and, • historical research.