古巴谢戈德阿维拉莫龙 "罗伯托-罗德里格斯 "教学总医院,神经外科和儿科重症监护服务严重头部创伤的儿科神经监测。

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurotrauma reports Pub Date : 2024-05-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/neur.2024.0031
Daysi Abreu Pérez, Angel J Lacerda Gallardo, Jose Antonio Gálvez
{"title":"古巴谢戈德阿维拉莫龙 \"罗伯托-罗德里格斯 \"教学总医院,神经外科和儿科重症监护服务严重头部创伤的儿科神经监测。","authors":"Daysi Abreu Pérez, Angel J Lacerda Gallardo, Jose Antonio Gálvez","doi":"10.1089/neur.2024.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among all types of trauma in children, traumatic brain injury has the greatest potential for the development of devastating consequences, with nearly three million affected each year in the world. A controlled, nonrandomized experimental study was carried out in pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury, whose objective was to evaluate the use of continuous multimodal neuromonitoring (MMN) of intracranial parameters as a guide in the treatment of children of different age-groups. The patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment received; clinical and imaging monitoring was performed in both. Group I included those whose treatment was guided by MMN of intracranial parameters such as intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and intracranial compliance, and group II included those who had only clinical and imaging monitoring. Eighty patients were studied, 41 in group I and 39 in group II. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to the sociodemographic variables and the results; as a consequence, both forms of treatment were outlined, for patients with MMN and for those who only have clinical and imaging monitoring. It is concluded that both treatment schemes can be used depending on technological availability, although the scheme with MMN is optimal.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Roberto Rodríguez\\\" General Teaching Hospital of Moron, Ciego De Avila, Cuba, Neurosurgery and Pediatric Intensive Care Services Pediatric Neuromonitoring in Severe Head Trauma.\",\"authors\":\"Daysi Abreu Pérez, Angel J Lacerda Gallardo, Jose Antonio Gálvez\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/neur.2024.0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Among all types of trauma in children, traumatic brain injury has the greatest potential for the development of devastating consequences, with nearly three million affected each year in the world. A controlled, nonrandomized experimental study was carried out in pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury, whose objective was to evaluate the use of continuous multimodal neuromonitoring (MMN) of intracranial parameters as a guide in the treatment of children of different age-groups. The patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment received; clinical and imaging monitoring was performed in both. Group I included those whose treatment was guided by MMN of intracranial parameters such as intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and intracranial compliance, and group II included those who had only clinical and imaging monitoring. Eighty patients were studied, 41 in group I and 39 in group II. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to the sociodemographic variables and the results; as a consequence, both forms of treatment were outlined, for patients with MMN and for those who only have clinical and imaging monitoring. It is concluded that both treatment schemes can be used depending on technological availability, although the scheme with MMN is optimal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurotrauma reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257106/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurotrauma reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2024.0031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotrauma reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2024.0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在所有类型的儿童创伤中,脑外伤最有可能造成破坏性后果,全世界每年有近 300 万人受到脑外伤的影响。我们在严重脑外伤的儿童患者中开展了一项非随机对照实验研究,目的是评估颅内参数连续多模态神经监测(MMN)作为不同年龄组儿童治疗指南的使用情况。根据所接受的治疗将患者分为两组,两组均进行临床和影像学监测。第一组包括以颅内压、脑灌注压和颅内顺应性等颅内参数 MMN 指导治疗的患者,第二组包括仅接受临床和影像学监测的患者。共研究了 80 名患者,其中 I 组 41 人,II 组 39 人。在社会人口学变量和结果方面,各组之间没有明显差异;因此,对 MMN 患者和仅接受临床和影像学监测的患者,两种治疗方式均适用。结论是,两种治疗方案都可以使用,具体取决于技术的可用性,但 MMN 方案是最佳方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Roberto Rodríguez" General Teaching Hospital of Moron, Ciego De Avila, Cuba, Neurosurgery and Pediatric Intensive Care Services Pediatric Neuromonitoring in Severe Head Trauma.

Among all types of trauma in children, traumatic brain injury has the greatest potential for the development of devastating consequences, with nearly three million affected each year in the world. A controlled, nonrandomized experimental study was carried out in pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury, whose objective was to evaluate the use of continuous multimodal neuromonitoring (MMN) of intracranial parameters as a guide in the treatment of children of different age-groups. The patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment received; clinical and imaging monitoring was performed in both. Group I included those whose treatment was guided by MMN of intracranial parameters such as intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and intracranial compliance, and group II included those who had only clinical and imaging monitoring. Eighty patients were studied, 41 in group I and 39 in group II. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to the sociodemographic variables and the results; as a consequence, both forms of treatment were outlined, for patients with MMN and for those who only have clinical and imaging monitoring. It is concluded that both treatment schemes can be used depending on technological availability, although the scheme with MMN is optimal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信