使用四种当前设备测量角膜病变眼全角膜散光的重复性和一致性。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-21 DOI:10.1111/ceo.14423
Yue Feng, Tore Nitter, Geir Bertelsen, Aleksandar Stojanovic
{"title":"使用四种当前设备测量角膜病变眼全角膜散光的重复性和一致性。","authors":"Yue Feng, Tore Nitter, Geir Bertelsen, Aleksandar Stojanovic","doi":"10.1111/ceo.14423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate repeatability and agreement in measurements of total corneal astigmatism (TCA) in keratoconic eyes, using four optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based devices: Anterion, Casia SS-1000, IOLMaster 700, and MS-39.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three consecutive measurements were taken with each device in 136 eyes. TCA values were converted into components J<sub>0</sub> and J<sub>45</sub>. The Anterion and the IOLMaster 700 also provided axial length (AL) measurements. The repeatability was calculated using pooled within-subject standard deviation (S<sub>w</sub>). The agreement among the four devices was assessed by pairwise comparisons and Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all devices, the repeatability of TCA measurements showed S<sub>w</sub> ≤0.23 D for TCA magnitude, ≤0.14 D for J<sub>0</sub>, and ≤0.12 D for J<sub>45</sub>. There were statistically significant differences in TCA magnitude for each pair, except for IOLMaster 700 with MS-39, and Anterion with MS-39. The repeatability (S<sub>w</sub>) of axis measurements had a statistically significant negative correlation with the TCA magnitude (p < 0.001 for all devices). Both Anterion and IOLMaster 700 had high repeatability in AL measurements (S<sub>w</sub>: 0.007 mm for Anterion and 0.009 mm for IOLMaster 700). The difference in AL between the two was 0.015 ± 0.033 mm (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All four devices showed good repeatability in TCA measurements in keratoconic eyes, the agreement for TCA measurements between the tested devices was generally low. Anterion and IOLMaster 700 showed good repeatability and agreement in AL measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":55253,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repeatability and agreement of total corneal astigmatism measured in keratoconic eyes using four current devices.\",\"authors\":\"Yue Feng, Tore Nitter, Geir Bertelsen, Aleksandar Stojanovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ceo.14423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate repeatability and agreement in measurements of total corneal astigmatism (TCA) in keratoconic eyes, using four optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based devices: Anterion, Casia SS-1000, IOLMaster 700, and MS-39.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three consecutive measurements were taken with each device in 136 eyes. TCA values were converted into components J<sub>0</sub> and J<sub>45</sub>. The Anterion and the IOLMaster 700 also provided axial length (AL) measurements. The repeatability was calculated using pooled within-subject standard deviation (S<sub>w</sub>). The agreement among the four devices was assessed by pairwise comparisons and Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all devices, the repeatability of TCA measurements showed S<sub>w</sub> ≤0.23 D for TCA magnitude, ≤0.14 D for J<sub>0</sub>, and ≤0.12 D for J<sub>45</sub>. There were statistically significant differences in TCA magnitude for each pair, except for IOLMaster 700 with MS-39, and Anterion with MS-39. The repeatability (S<sub>w</sub>) of axis measurements had a statistically significant negative correlation with the TCA magnitude (p < 0.001 for all devices). Both Anterion and IOLMaster 700 had high repeatability in AL measurements (S<sub>w</sub>: 0.007 mm for Anterion and 0.009 mm for IOLMaster 700). The difference in AL between the two was 0.015 ± 0.033 mm (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All four devices showed good repeatability in TCA measurements in keratoconic eyes, the agreement for TCA measurements between the tested devices was generally low. Anterion and IOLMaster 700 showed good repeatability and agreement in AL measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14423\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14423","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:评估使用四种光学相干断层扫描(OCT)设备测量角膜病变眼全角膜散光(TCA)的重复性和一致性:Anterion、Casia SS-1000、IOLMaster 700 和 MS-39:方法:使用每种设备对 136 只眼睛进行了三次连续测量。将 TCA 值转换成 J0 和 J45 组份。Anterion 和 IOLMaster 700 还提供了轴向长度 (AL) 测量值。重复性是通过汇总的受试者内标准偏差 (Sw) 计算得出的。通过配对比较和布兰德-阿尔特曼图评估了四种设备之间的一致性:所有设备的 TCA 测量重复性显示,TCA 幅值的 Sw ≤ 0.23 D,J0 ≤ 0.14 D,J45 ≤ 0.12 D。除 IOLMaster 700 与 MS-39 和 Anterion 与 MS-39 外,每对晶体的 TCA 量级在统计学上都有显著差异。轴测量的重复性(Sw)与 TCA 幅值呈统计学意义上的显著负相关(P w:Anterion 为 0.007 mm,IOLMaster 700 为 0.009 mm)。两者之间的 AL 差异为 0.015 ± 0.033 毫米(p 结论):所有四种设备在角膜病变眼的 TCA 测量中都表现出良好的重复性,但测试设备之间的 TCA 测量一致性普遍较低。Anterion 和 IOLMaster 700 在 AL 测量中表现出良好的重复性和一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Repeatability and agreement of total corneal astigmatism measured in keratoconic eyes using four current devices.

Background: To evaluate repeatability and agreement in measurements of total corneal astigmatism (TCA) in keratoconic eyes, using four optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based devices: Anterion, Casia SS-1000, IOLMaster 700, and MS-39.

Methods: Three consecutive measurements were taken with each device in 136 eyes. TCA values were converted into components J0 and J45. The Anterion and the IOLMaster 700 also provided axial length (AL) measurements. The repeatability was calculated using pooled within-subject standard deviation (Sw). The agreement among the four devices was assessed by pairwise comparisons and Bland-Altman plots.

Results: For all devices, the repeatability of TCA measurements showed Sw ≤0.23 D for TCA magnitude, ≤0.14 D for J0, and ≤0.12 D for J45. There were statistically significant differences in TCA magnitude for each pair, except for IOLMaster 700 with MS-39, and Anterion with MS-39. The repeatability (Sw) of axis measurements had a statistically significant negative correlation with the TCA magnitude (p < 0.001 for all devices). Both Anterion and IOLMaster 700 had high repeatability in AL measurements (Sw: 0.007 mm for Anterion and 0.009 mm for IOLMaster 700). The difference in AL between the two was 0.015 ± 0.033 mm (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: All four devices showed good repeatability in TCA measurements in keratoconic eyes, the agreement for TCA measurements between the tested devices was generally low. Anterion and IOLMaster 700 showed good repeatability and agreement in AL measurements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research and reviews dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research which are international in scope and application. CEO recognises the importance of collaborative research and welcomes papers that have a direct influence on ophthalmic practice but are not unique to ophthalmology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信