自愿献血者中 COVID-19 的血清流行率。

IF 0.6 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Asian Journal of Transfusion Science Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-07 DOI:10.4103/ajts.ajts_91_23
Arumugam Pothipillai, Swathandran Hamsavardhini, Deepa Duraisamy, Lincy Thiyagarajan, Chandrasekaran Kaliyaperumal, Jyotsnaa Grace Velure Mohan Rao
{"title":"自愿献血者中 COVID-19 的血清流行率。","authors":"Arumugam Pothipillai, Swathandran Hamsavardhini, Deepa Duraisamy, Lincy Thiyagarajan, Chandrasekaran Kaliyaperumal, Jyotsnaa Grace Velure Mohan Rao","doi":"10.4103/ajts.ajts_91_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>COVID-19 usually presents with mild symptoms. No cases of transfusion - transmission of COVID-19 had been reported. Assessing the prevalence of viral infections among blood donors is essential to frame blood safety strategies.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The main aim of this study is to assess the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthy and asymptomatic voluntary blood donors by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted among voluntary blood donors using a consecutive sampling technique in the Department of Transfusion Medicine, the Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Guindy, Chennai, for 18 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adhering to COVID-19 pandemic guidelines and donor eligibility criteria, blood samples collected from 500 asymptomatic unvaccinated voluntary blood donors were tested for SARS-CoV-2 (IgG + IgM + IgA and IgG) antibodies by ELISA. Adding IgA to a conventional IgM and IgG serological test improves sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>The collected donor data were analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics software. Pearson's Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used. <i>P</i> = 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IgG seropositivity among the donors was 58.8%, and IgM + IgA seropositivity was 29.6%. There was no statistically significant difference in the COVID-19 IgG/IgM + IgA seropositivity status with age, gender, blood group, occupation, or socioeconomic status. The IgG and IgM/IgA/IgG ELISA kits showed a difference of 13 cases which could be attributed to the higher sensitivity of IgG alone ELISA kit. This increased the seroprevalence by 3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of donors were either IgG or IgM and IgA positive, despite remaining asymptomatic. The seropositivity rate coincided with the COVID-19 surge among population.</p>","PeriodicalId":42296,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","volume":"18 1","pages":"97-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11259330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seroprevalence of COVID-19 among voluntary blood donors.\",\"authors\":\"Arumugam Pothipillai, Swathandran Hamsavardhini, Deepa Duraisamy, Lincy Thiyagarajan, Chandrasekaran Kaliyaperumal, Jyotsnaa Grace Velure Mohan Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ajts.ajts_91_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>COVID-19 usually presents with mild symptoms. No cases of transfusion - transmission of COVID-19 had been reported. Assessing the prevalence of viral infections among blood donors is essential to frame blood safety strategies.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The main aim of this study is to assess the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthy and asymptomatic voluntary blood donors by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted among voluntary blood donors using a consecutive sampling technique in the Department of Transfusion Medicine, the Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Guindy, Chennai, for 18 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adhering to COVID-19 pandemic guidelines and donor eligibility criteria, blood samples collected from 500 asymptomatic unvaccinated voluntary blood donors were tested for SARS-CoV-2 (IgG + IgM + IgA and IgG) antibodies by ELISA. Adding IgA to a conventional IgM and IgG serological test improves sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>The collected donor data were analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics software. Pearson's Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used. <i>P</i> = 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IgG seropositivity among the donors was 58.8%, and IgM + IgA seropositivity was 29.6%. There was no statistically significant difference in the COVID-19 IgG/IgM + IgA seropositivity status with age, gender, blood group, occupation, or socioeconomic status. The IgG and IgM/IgA/IgG ELISA kits showed a difference of 13 cases which could be attributed to the higher sensitivity of IgG alone ELISA kit. This increased the seroprevalence by 3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of donors were either IgG or IgM and IgA positive, despite remaining asymptomatic. The seropositivity rate coincided with the COVID-19 surge among population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"97-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11259330/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_91_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_91_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:COVID-19 通常症状轻微。目前尚无COVID-19通过输血传播的病例报道。目的:本研究的主要目的是通过酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)评估健康和无症状自愿献血者中 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的血清流行率:这项横断面研究采用连续抽样技术,在钦奈Guindy的泰米尔纳德邦M.G.R.博士医科大学输血医学系自愿献血者中进行,为期18个月:方法:根据 COVID-19 大流行指南和献血者资格标准,用 ELISA 方法对从 500 名无症状、未接种疫苗的自愿献血者采集的血样进行 SARS-CoV-2 (IgG + IgM + IgA 和 IgG)抗体检测。在传统的 IgM 和 IgG 血清学检测中加入 IgA 可提高灵敏度:使用 IBM SPSS 统计软件对收集的供体数据进行分析。采用皮尔逊卡方检验和费雪精确检验。P=0.05为有统计学意义:献血者的 IgG 血清阳性率为 58.8%,IgM + IgA 血清阳性率为 29.6%。COVID-19 IgG/IgM + IgA血清阳性率与年龄、性别、血型、职业或社会经济地位的差异无统计学意义。IgG 和 IgM/IgA/IgG 酶联免疫吸附试剂盒显示有 13 例差异,这可能是由于仅 IgG 酶联免疫吸附试剂盒的灵敏度较高。这使血清流行率增加了 3%:结论:大多数捐献者的 IgG 或 IgM 和 IgA 阳性,尽管仍无症状。血清阳性率与 COVID-19 在人群中的激增相吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seroprevalence of COVID-19 among voluntary blood donors.

Context: COVID-19 usually presents with mild symptoms. No cases of transfusion - transmission of COVID-19 had been reported. Assessing the prevalence of viral infections among blood donors is essential to frame blood safety strategies.

Aim: The main aim of this study is to assess the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthy and asymptomatic voluntary blood donors by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Setting and design: This cross-sectional study was conducted among voluntary blood donors using a consecutive sampling technique in the Department of Transfusion Medicine, the Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Guindy, Chennai, for 18 months.

Methods: Adhering to COVID-19 pandemic guidelines and donor eligibility criteria, blood samples collected from 500 asymptomatic unvaccinated voluntary blood donors were tested for SARS-CoV-2 (IgG + IgM + IgA and IgG) antibodies by ELISA. Adding IgA to a conventional IgM and IgG serological test improves sensitivity.

Statistical analysis used: The collected donor data were analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics software. Pearson's Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used. P = 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: IgG seropositivity among the donors was 58.8%, and IgM + IgA seropositivity was 29.6%. There was no statistically significant difference in the COVID-19 IgG/IgM + IgA seropositivity status with age, gender, blood group, occupation, or socioeconomic status. The IgG and IgM/IgA/IgG ELISA kits showed a difference of 13 cases which could be attributed to the higher sensitivity of IgG alone ELISA kit. This increased the seroprevalence by 3%.

Conclusion: The majority of donors were either IgG or IgM and IgA positive, despite remaining asymptomatic. The seropositivity rate coincided with the COVID-19 surge among population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
44 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信