风险最小化,机会最大化:传染病器官供应流程调查。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Transplant Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1111/tid.14342
Katya Prakash, Kapil K Saharia, Andrew Karaba, Nancy Law, Fritzie S Albarillo, Tirdad T Zangeneh, Paolo Grossi, Rachel Miller, Monica Slavin, Shmuel Shoham, Michael Ison, Ricardo M La Hoz, John W Baddley
{"title":"风险最小化,机会最大化:传染病器官供应流程调查。","authors":"Katya Prakash, Kapil K Saharia, Andrew Karaba, Nancy Law, Fritzie S Albarillo, Tirdad T Zangeneh, Paolo Grossi, Rachel Miller, Monica Slavin, Shmuel Shoham, Michael Ison, Ricardo M La Hoz, John W Baddley","doi":"10.1111/tid.14342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to understand how transplant infectious disease (TID) physicians assess a potential donor with known or suspected infection and describe posttransplant management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a survey of 10 organ offer scenarios and asked questions pertaining to organ acceptability for transplantation and management posttransplant. The survey was distributed to TID clinicians via transplant society listservs and email. Responses were recorded in REDCap, and descriptive statistics were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred thirteen infectious disease physicians responded to the survey, of whom 85 completed all cases. Respondents were generally in agreement regarding organ acceptability, although some divergence was seen when evaluating lungs from donors with influenza, tuberculosis, or multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter infection. Posttransplant management showed more variation. Areas of optimization were identified: (1) Further understanding of where risk-mitigation strategies within the donor offer process may improve donor acceptability and therefore organ utilization; (2) importance of recipient considerations in assessing degree of infectious risk; and (3) gaps in evidenced-based data regarding optimal posttransplant management of recipients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evaluation of donor offers by TID clinicians is a complex process. Although the survey does not itself serve to make recommendations regarding best practices, it highlights areas where generation of data to inform acceptance and management practices may allow for improved organ utilization and recipient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14342"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimizing risk while maximizing opportunity: The infectious disease organ offer process survey.\",\"authors\":\"Katya Prakash, Kapil K Saharia, Andrew Karaba, Nancy Law, Fritzie S Albarillo, Tirdad T Zangeneh, Paolo Grossi, Rachel Miller, Monica Slavin, Shmuel Shoham, Michael Ison, Ricardo M La Hoz, John W Baddley\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tid.14342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to understand how transplant infectious disease (TID) physicians assess a potential donor with known or suspected infection and describe posttransplant management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a survey of 10 organ offer scenarios and asked questions pertaining to organ acceptability for transplantation and management posttransplant. The survey was distributed to TID clinicians via transplant society listservs and email. Responses were recorded in REDCap, and descriptive statistics were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred thirteen infectious disease physicians responded to the survey, of whom 85 completed all cases. Respondents were generally in agreement regarding organ acceptability, although some divergence was seen when evaluating lungs from donors with influenza, tuberculosis, or multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter infection. Posttransplant management showed more variation. Areas of optimization were identified: (1) Further understanding of where risk-mitigation strategies within the donor offer process may improve donor acceptability and therefore organ utilization; (2) importance of recipient considerations in assessing degree of infectious risk; and (3) gaps in evidenced-based data regarding optimal posttransplant management of recipients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evaluation of donor offers by TID clinicians is a complex process. Although the survey does not itself serve to make recommendations regarding best practices, it highlights areas where generation of data to inform acceptance and management practices may allow for improved organ utilization and recipient management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14342\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在了解移植感染性疾病(TID)医生如何评估已知或疑似感染的潜在供体,并描述移植后的管理:本研究的目的是了解移植传染病(TID)医生如何评估已知或疑似感染的潜在供体并描述移植后的管理:我们设计了一份包含 10 种器官提供情况的调查表,并提出了与器官移植的可接受性和移植后管理相关的问题。调查表通过移植协会列表服务器和电子邮件分发给 TID 临床医生。调查结果:共有 113 名传染病医生回复了调查,其中 85 人完成了所有病例。受访者对器官可接受性的看法基本一致,但在评估患有流感、肺结核或耐多药醋酸杆菌感染的捐献者的肺时出现了一些分歧。移植后管理方面的差异更大。已确定的优化领域包括(1)进一步了解供体提供过程中的风险缓解策略可提高供体的可接受性,从而提高器官利用率;(2)受体因素在评估感染风险程度中的重要性;以及(3)有关受体移植后最佳管理的循证数据存在差距:TID 临床医生对捐献者意愿的评估是一个复杂的过程。虽然这项调查本身并不能为最佳实践提供建议,但它强调了一些领域,在这些领域中,数据的生成可以为接受和管理实践提供依据,从而提高器官利用率和受者管理水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimizing risk while maximizing opportunity: The infectious disease organ offer process survey.

Background: The purpose of this study was to understand how transplant infectious disease (TID) physicians assess a potential donor with known or suspected infection and describe posttransplant management.

Methods: We designed a survey of 10 organ offer scenarios and asked questions pertaining to organ acceptability for transplantation and management posttransplant. The survey was distributed to TID clinicians via transplant society listservs and email. Responses were recorded in REDCap, and descriptive statistics were employed.

Results: One hundred thirteen infectious disease physicians responded to the survey, of whom 85 completed all cases. Respondents were generally in agreement regarding organ acceptability, although some divergence was seen when evaluating lungs from donors with influenza, tuberculosis, or multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter infection. Posttransplant management showed more variation. Areas of optimization were identified: (1) Further understanding of where risk-mitigation strategies within the donor offer process may improve donor acceptability and therefore organ utilization; (2) importance of recipient considerations in assessing degree of infectious risk; and (3) gaps in evidenced-based data regarding optimal posttransplant management of recipients.

Conclusion: Evaluation of donor offers by TID clinicians is a complex process. Although the survey does not itself serve to make recommendations regarding best practices, it highlights areas where generation of data to inform acceptance and management practices may allow for improved organ utilization and recipient management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplant Infectious Disease
Transplant Infectious Disease 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
210
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal. Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信