Mansueto Gomes-Neto, Andre Rodrigues Durães, Lino Sérgio Rocha Conceição, Michelli Bernardone Saquetto, Iura Gonzalez Alves, Neil A Smart, Vitor Oliveira Carvalho
{"title":"不同运动干预对冠心病患者以峰值耗氧量衡量的心肺功能的影响:系统综述》。","authors":"Mansueto Gomes-Neto, Andre Rodrigues Durães, Lino Sérgio Rocha Conceição, Michelli Bernardone Saquetto, Iura Gonzalez Alves, Neil A Smart, Vitor Oliveira Carvalho","doi":"10.1007/s40279-024-02053-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise is an important component of rehabilitation care for people with coronary heart disease (CHD).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to critically analyze and summarize the existing evidence from published systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have evaluated the effects of different types of exercise interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness, as measured by peak oxygen consumption in people with CHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases (Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, and PEDro) were searched for SRs of exercise interventions of people with CHD. Two reviewers assessed the quality of SRs using the AMSTAR-2 tool and evaluated the strength of evidence quality with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system for relevant outcome measures. Mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one SRs (with 125 RCTs) met the study criteria, including 33,608 patients. Compared with usual care, continuous aerobic exercise produced an improvement in peak oxygen consumption, MD of 3.8 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup> (95% CI: 3.204.4, I<sup>2</sup> = 67%); high-intensity interval training, MD 6.1 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup> (95% CI: 0.4-11.8, I<sup>2</sup> = 97%); resistance training, MD of 2.1 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup> (95% CI: 0.98-3.2, I<sup>2</sup> = 60%); combined aerobic and resistance training, MD of 3.0 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup> (95% CI: 2.5-3.4, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%); and water-based exercise, MD of 4.4 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup> (95% CI, 2.1-6.7; I<sup>2</sup> = 2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise interventions improve peak oxygen consumption in people with CHD. However, there was moderate to very-low certainty for the evidence found.</p>","PeriodicalId":21969,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2395-2409"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Different Exercise Interventions on Cardiorespiratory Fitness, as Measured by Peak Oxygen Consumption in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.\",\"authors\":\"Mansueto Gomes-Neto, Andre Rodrigues Durães, Lino Sérgio Rocha Conceição, Michelli Bernardone Saquetto, Iura Gonzalez Alves, Neil A Smart, Vitor Oliveira Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40279-024-02053-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise is an important component of rehabilitation care for people with coronary heart disease (CHD).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to critically analyze and summarize the existing evidence from published systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have evaluated the effects of different types of exercise interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness, as measured by peak oxygen consumption in people with CHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases (Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, and PEDro) were searched for SRs of exercise interventions of people with CHD. Two reviewers assessed the quality of SRs using the AMSTAR-2 tool and evaluated the strength of evidence quality with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system for relevant outcome measures. Mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one SRs (with 125 RCTs) met the study criteria, including 33,608 patients. Compared with usual care, continuous aerobic exercise produced an improvement in peak oxygen consumption, MD of 3.8 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup> (95% CI: 3.204.4, I<sup>2</sup> = 67%); high-intensity interval training, MD 6.1 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup> (95% CI: 0.4-11.8, I<sup>2</sup> = 97%); resistance training, MD of 2.1 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup> (95% CI: 0.98-3.2, I<sup>2</sup> = 60%); combined aerobic and resistance training, MD of 3.0 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup> (95% CI: 2.5-3.4, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%); and water-based exercise, MD of 4.4 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup> (95% CI, 2.1-6.7; I<sup>2</sup> = 2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise interventions improve peak oxygen consumption in people with CHD. However, there was moderate to very-low certainty for the evidence found.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2395-2409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02053-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02053-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of Different Exercise Interventions on Cardiorespiratory Fitness, as Measured by Peak Oxygen Consumption in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.
Background: Exercise is an important component of rehabilitation care for people with coronary heart disease (CHD).
Objectives: The aim of this study was to critically analyze and summarize the existing evidence from published systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have evaluated the effects of different types of exercise interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness, as measured by peak oxygen consumption in people with CHD.
Methods: Electronic databases (Cochrane Library, Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, and PEDro) were searched for SRs of exercise interventions of people with CHD. Two reviewers assessed the quality of SRs using the AMSTAR-2 tool and evaluated the strength of evidence quality with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system for relevant outcome measures. Mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
Results: Thirty-one SRs (with 125 RCTs) met the study criteria, including 33,608 patients. Compared with usual care, continuous aerobic exercise produced an improvement in peak oxygen consumption, MD of 3.8 mL kg-1 min-1 (95% CI: 3.204.4, I2 = 67%); high-intensity interval training, MD 6.1 mL kg-1 min-1 (95% CI: 0.4-11.8, I2 = 97%); resistance training, MD of 2.1 mL kg-1 min-1 (95% CI: 0.98-3.2, I2 = 60%); combined aerobic and resistance training, MD of 3.0 mL kg-1 min-1 (95% CI: 2.5-3.4, I2 = 0%); and water-based exercise, MD of 4.4 mL kg-1 min-1 (95% CI, 2.1-6.7; I2 = 2%).
Conclusion: Exercise interventions improve peak oxygen consumption in people with CHD. However, there was moderate to very-low certainty for the evidence found.
期刊介绍:
Sports Medicine focuses on providing definitive and comprehensive review articles that interpret and evaluate current literature, aiming to offer insights into research findings in the sports medicine and exercise field. The journal covers major topics such as sports medicine and sports science, medical syndromes associated with sport and exercise, clinical medicine's role in injury prevention and treatment, exercise for rehabilitation and health, and the application of physiological and biomechanical principles to specific sports.
Types of Articles:
Review Articles: Definitive and comprehensive reviews that interpret and evaluate current literature to provide rationale for and application of research findings.
Leading/Current Opinion Articles: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues in the field.
Original Research Articles: High-quality research articles.
Enhanced Features: Additional features like slide sets, videos, and animations aimed at increasing the visibility, readership, and educational value of the journal's content.
Plain Language Summaries: Summaries accompanying articles to assist readers in understanding important medical advances.
Peer Review Process:
All manuscripts undergo peer review by international experts to ensure quality and rigor. The journal also welcomes Letters to the Editor, which will be considered for publication.