Hae E Noh, Min-Seok Rha, Yeonsu Jeong, Chang-Hoon Kim, Hyung-Ju Cho
{"title":"位置性和非位置性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停多层次手术的疗效和成功预测因素。","authors":"Hae E Noh, Min-Seok Rha, Yeonsu Jeong, Chang-Hoon Kim, Hyung-Ju Cho","doi":"10.1002/ohn.912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the surgical outcomes and identify predictors of surgical success in patients with positional and non-positional obstructive sleep apnea following multilevel airway surgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Singe-tertiary medical center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 158 patients with obstructive sleep apnea who underwent multilevel airway surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to position dependency: \"positional patients\" group (n = 100), and \"nonpositional patients\" group (n = 58). The characteristics and surgical outcomes of the 2 groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nonpositional group included younger and more obese patients in comparison to the positional group. Moreover, the nonpositional group had more severe disease than the positional group. Both groups showed overall improvement after surgery, and the surgical success rate did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (nonpositional, 41.4% vs positional, 48.0%; P = .424). Notably, 69.0% of patients belonging to the non-positional group converted to positional group postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that larger tonsil size, female sex, and higher mean O<sub>2</sub> saturation were associated with higher success rate in the positional group, whereas larger tonsil size was associated with surgical success in the nonpositional group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both nonpositional and positional groups showed improvements following multilevel airway surgery, and surgery induced a transition from nonpositional to positional group. Given that the factors related to surgical success differed between the two groups, surgeons should consider position dependency and these distinct factors during decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1562-1571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes and Predictors of Success Following Multilevel Surgery in Positional and Nonpositional Obstructive Sleep Apnea.\",\"authors\":\"Hae E Noh, Min-Seok Rha, Yeonsu Jeong, Chang-Hoon Kim, Hyung-Ju Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ohn.912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the surgical outcomes and identify predictors of surgical success in patients with positional and non-positional obstructive sleep apnea following multilevel airway surgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Singe-tertiary medical center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 158 patients with obstructive sleep apnea who underwent multilevel airway surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to position dependency: \\\"positional patients\\\" group (n = 100), and \\\"nonpositional patients\\\" group (n = 58). The characteristics and surgical outcomes of the 2 groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nonpositional group included younger and more obese patients in comparison to the positional group. Moreover, the nonpositional group had more severe disease than the positional group. Both groups showed overall improvement after surgery, and the surgical success rate did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (nonpositional, 41.4% vs positional, 48.0%; P = .424). Notably, 69.0% of patients belonging to the non-positional group converted to positional group postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that larger tonsil size, female sex, and higher mean O<sub>2</sub> saturation were associated with higher success rate in the positional group, whereas larger tonsil size was associated with surgical success in the nonpositional group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both nonpositional and positional groups showed improvements following multilevel airway surgery, and surgery induced a transition from nonpositional to positional group. Given that the factors related to surgical success differed between the two groups, surgeons should consider position dependency and these distinct factors during decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1562-1571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.912\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes and Predictors of Success Following Multilevel Surgery in Positional and Nonpositional Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
Objective: To assess the surgical outcomes and identify predictors of surgical success in patients with positional and non-positional obstructive sleep apnea following multilevel airway surgery.
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Singe-tertiary medical center.
Methods: This study included 158 patients with obstructive sleep apnea who underwent multilevel airway surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to position dependency: "positional patients" group (n = 100), and "nonpositional patients" group (n = 58). The characteristics and surgical outcomes of the 2 groups were compared.
Results: The nonpositional group included younger and more obese patients in comparison to the positional group. Moreover, the nonpositional group had more severe disease than the positional group. Both groups showed overall improvement after surgery, and the surgical success rate did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (nonpositional, 41.4% vs positional, 48.0%; P = .424). Notably, 69.0% of patients belonging to the non-positional group converted to positional group postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that larger tonsil size, female sex, and higher mean O2 saturation were associated with higher success rate in the positional group, whereas larger tonsil size was associated with surgical success in the nonpositional group.
Conclusion: Both nonpositional and positional groups showed improvements following multilevel airway surgery, and surgery induced a transition from nonpositional to positional group. Given that the factors related to surgical success differed between the two groups, surgeons should consider position dependency and these distinct factors during decision-making.
期刊介绍:
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.