Michele Dario Gurzì, Luigi Cianni, Giovan Giuseppe Mazzella, Sara Calori, Eugenio Libutti, Raffaele Vitiello, Giulio Maccauro, Massimiliano Nannerini
{"title":"使用 \"ADAPT 系统 \"进行股骨近端骨折髓内钉合骨一年的病例对照研究。病例对照研究。","authors":"Michele Dario Gurzì, Luigi Cianni, Giovan Giuseppe Mazzella, Sara Calori, Eugenio Libutti, Raffaele Vitiello, Giulio Maccauro, Massimiliano Nannerini","doi":"10.52965/001c.121094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proximal femoral fractures (PFF) are a significant health concern among the elderly, often leading to complications and high mortality rates. Intramedullary nailing is widely considered the most effective treatment for lateral proximal femoral fractures (LPFF), with the Tip Apex Distance (TAD) being a crucial predictor of surgical success. This study aimed to compare outcomes between patients treated with and without the ADAPT (ADAptive Positioning Technology) system, which aids in the precise placement of the cephalic screw.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 97 patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated in 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: those treated with the ADAPT system (group I, n=34) and those treated without it (group II, n=63). Fractures were classified according to AO/OTA classification. The primary outcomes measured were operative time, cephalic screw angle, TAD, and incidence of lag screw cut-out. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and t-tests, with significance set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ADAPT system did not significantly reduce TAD (18.21 mm in the ADAPT group vs. 19.94 mm in the control group, p=0.149). Operative times were similar between the groups. The incidence of lag screw cut-out was low in both groups, with no significant differences. The study confirmed a strong correlation between higher TAD and increased risk of screw cut-out, underscoring the importance of precise screw placement.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Computer-assisted surgery, such as the ADAPT system, aims to enhance the accuracy of cephalic screw placement. In this study, the ADAPT system didn't demonstrate a statistically significant advantage in reducing TAD or preventing screw cut-out. Nevertheless, the critical role of TAD in preventing fixation failure was reaffirmed, emphasising the need for precise surgical techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the ADAPT system did not show a significant advantage in reducing TAD or preventing screw cut-out in this study, the importance of achieving optimal TAD in cephalomedullary nailing was reinforced. Future research should continue to explore the role of computer-assisted systems in enhancing surgical accuracy and improving outcomes for patients with LPFF.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"16 ","pages":"121094"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One year \\\"ADAPT system\\\" use for proximal femoral fracture osteosynthesis with intramedullary nail . A case control study.\",\"authors\":\"Michele Dario Gurzì, Luigi Cianni, Giovan Giuseppe Mazzella, Sara Calori, Eugenio Libutti, Raffaele Vitiello, Giulio Maccauro, Massimiliano Nannerini\",\"doi\":\"10.52965/001c.121094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proximal femoral fractures (PFF) are a significant health concern among the elderly, often leading to complications and high mortality rates. Intramedullary nailing is widely considered the most effective treatment for lateral proximal femoral fractures (LPFF), with the Tip Apex Distance (TAD) being a crucial predictor of surgical success. This study aimed to compare outcomes between patients treated with and without the ADAPT (ADAptive Positioning Technology) system, which aids in the precise placement of the cephalic screw.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 97 patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated in 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: those treated with the ADAPT system (group I, n=34) and those treated without it (group II, n=63). Fractures were classified according to AO/OTA classification. The primary outcomes measured were operative time, cephalic screw angle, TAD, and incidence of lag screw cut-out. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and t-tests, with significance set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ADAPT system did not significantly reduce TAD (18.21 mm in the ADAPT group vs. 19.94 mm in the control group, p=0.149). Operative times were similar between the groups. The incidence of lag screw cut-out was low in both groups, with no significant differences. The study confirmed a strong correlation between higher TAD and increased risk of screw cut-out, underscoring the importance of precise screw placement.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Computer-assisted surgery, such as the ADAPT system, aims to enhance the accuracy of cephalic screw placement. In this study, the ADAPT system didn't demonstrate a statistically significant advantage in reducing TAD or preventing screw cut-out. Nevertheless, the critical role of TAD in preventing fixation failure was reaffirmed, emphasising the need for precise surgical techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the ADAPT system did not show a significant advantage in reducing TAD or preventing screw cut-out in this study, the importance of achieving optimal TAD in cephalomedullary nailing was reinforced. Future research should continue to explore the role of computer-assisted systems in enhancing surgical accuracy and improving outcomes for patients with LPFF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"121094\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257832/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.121094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.121094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介股骨近端骨折(PFF)是老年人的一大健康问题,往往会导致并发症和高死亡率。髓内钉被广泛认为是治疗股骨近端外侧骨折(LPFF)最有效的方法,而尖端距(TAD)是预测手术成功与否的关键因素。本研究旨在比较使用和未使用 ADAPT(ADAptive Positioning Technology)系统治疗患者的疗效,该系统有助于头端螺钉的精确放置:对2022年接受治疗的97名转子间骨折患者进行了回顾性分析。患者被分为两组:使用ADAPT系统治疗的患者(第一组,34人)和未使用该系统治疗的患者(第二组,63人)。骨折根据AO/OTA分类法进行分类。测量的主要结果包括手术时间、头螺钉角度、TAD和滞后螺钉切断的发生率。统计分析包括卡方检验和 t 检验,显著性以 P < 0.05 为标准:ADAPT系统并未显著降低TAD(ADAPT组为18.21毫米,对照组为19.94毫米,P=0.149)。两组的手术时间相似。两组的滞后螺钉切出发生率均较低,无显著差异。研究证实,TAD越高,螺钉断裂的风险越高,两者之间存在很强的相关性,强调了精确放置螺钉的重要性:讨论:计算机辅助手术,如 ADAPT 系统,旨在提高头颅螺钉置入的准确性。在这项研究中,ADAPT 系统在减少 TAD 或防止螺钉断裂方面并没有表现出明显的统计学优势。然而,TAD在防止固定失败方面的关键作用再次得到证实,强调了精确手术技术的必要性:本研究中,虽然ADAPT系统在减少TAD或防止螺钉脱出方面没有显示出明显优势,但在头髓内钉中实现最佳TAD的重要性却得到了加强。未来的研究应继续探索计算机辅助系统在提高手术准确性和改善 LPFF 患者预后方面的作用。
One year "ADAPT system" use for proximal femoral fracture osteosynthesis with intramedullary nail . A case control study.
Introduction: Proximal femoral fractures (PFF) are a significant health concern among the elderly, often leading to complications and high mortality rates. Intramedullary nailing is widely considered the most effective treatment for lateral proximal femoral fractures (LPFF), with the Tip Apex Distance (TAD) being a crucial predictor of surgical success. This study aimed to compare outcomes between patients treated with and without the ADAPT (ADAptive Positioning Technology) system, which aids in the precise placement of the cephalic screw.
Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 97 patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated in 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: those treated with the ADAPT system (group I, n=34) and those treated without it (group II, n=63). Fractures were classified according to AO/OTA classification. The primary outcomes measured were operative time, cephalic screw angle, TAD, and incidence of lag screw cut-out. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and t-tests, with significance set at P < 0.05.
Results: The ADAPT system did not significantly reduce TAD (18.21 mm in the ADAPT group vs. 19.94 mm in the control group, p=0.149). Operative times were similar between the groups. The incidence of lag screw cut-out was low in both groups, with no significant differences. The study confirmed a strong correlation between higher TAD and increased risk of screw cut-out, underscoring the importance of precise screw placement.
Discussion: Computer-assisted surgery, such as the ADAPT system, aims to enhance the accuracy of cephalic screw placement. In this study, the ADAPT system didn't demonstrate a statistically significant advantage in reducing TAD or preventing screw cut-out. Nevertheless, the critical role of TAD in preventing fixation failure was reaffirmed, emphasising the need for precise surgical techniques.
Conclusion: While the ADAPT system did not show a significant advantage in reducing TAD or preventing screw cut-out in this study, the importance of achieving optimal TAD in cephalomedullary nailing was reinforced. Future research should continue to explore the role of computer-assisted systems in enhancing surgical accuracy and improving outcomes for patients with LPFF.
期刊介绍:
Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.