关于浸润性小叶乳腺癌的国际调查确定了优先研究的问题。

IF 6.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Steffi Oesterreich, Leigh Pate, Adrian V Lee, Fangyuan Chen, Rachel C Jankowitz, Rita Mukhtar, Otto Metzger, Matthew J Sikora, Christopher I Li, Christos Sotiriou, Osama S Shah, Thijs Koorman, Gary Ulaner, Jorge S Reis-Filho, Nancy M Davidson, Karen Van Baelen, Laurie Hutcheson, Siobhan Freeney, Flora Migyanka, Claire Turner, Patrick Derksen, Todd Bear, Christine Desmedt
{"title":"关于浸润性小叶乳腺癌的国际调查确定了优先研究的问题。","authors":"Steffi Oesterreich, Leigh Pate, Adrian V Lee, Fangyuan Chen, Rachel C Jankowitz, Rita Mukhtar, Otto Metzger, Matthew J Sikora, Christopher I Li, Christos Sotiriou, Osama S Shah, Thijs Koorman, Gary Ulaner, Jorge S Reis-Filho, Nancy M Davidson, Karen Van Baelen, Laurie Hutcheson, Siobhan Freeney, Flora Migyanka, Claire Turner, Patrick Derksen, Todd Bear, Christine Desmedt","doi":"10.1038/s41523-024-00661-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is growing awareness of the unique etiology, biology, and clinical presentation of invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC), but additional research is needed to ensure translation of findings into management and treatment guidelines. We conducted a survey with input from breast cancer physicians, laboratory-based researchers, and patients to analyze the current understanding of ILC, and identify consensus research questions. 1774 participants from 66 countries respondents self-identified as clinicians (N = 413), researchers (N = 376), and breast cancer patients and advocates (N = 1120), with some belonging to more than one category. The majority of physicians reported being very/extremely (41%) to moderately (42%) confident in describing the differences between ILC and invasive breast cancer of no special type (NST). Knowledge of histology was seen as important (73%) and as affecting treatment decisions (51%), and most agreed that refining treatment guidelines would be valuable (76%). 85% of clinicians have never powered a clinical trial to allow subset analysis for histological subtypes, but the majority would consider it, and would participate in an ILC clinical trials consortium. The majority of laboratory researchers, reported being and very/extremely (48%) to moderately (29%) confident in describing differences between ILC and NST. They reported that ILCs are inadequately presented in large genomic data sets, and that ILC models are insufficient. The majority have adequate access to tissue or blood from patients with ILC. The majority of patients and advocates (52%) thought that their health care providers did not sufficiently explain the unique features of ILC. They identified improvement of ILC screening/early detection, and identification of better imaging tools as top research priorities. In contrast, both researchers and clinicians identified understanding of endocrine resistance and identifying novel drugs that can be tested in clinical trials as top research priority. In summary, we have gathered information from an international community of physicians, researchers, and patients/advocates that we expect will lay the foundation for a community-informed collaborative research agenda, with the goal of improving management and personalizing treatment for patients with ILC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19247,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Breast Cancer","volume":"10 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11271268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International survey on invasive lobular breast cancer identifies priority research questions.\",\"authors\":\"Steffi Oesterreich, Leigh Pate, Adrian V Lee, Fangyuan Chen, Rachel C Jankowitz, Rita Mukhtar, Otto Metzger, Matthew J Sikora, Christopher I Li, Christos Sotiriou, Osama S Shah, Thijs Koorman, Gary Ulaner, Jorge S Reis-Filho, Nancy M Davidson, Karen Van Baelen, Laurie Hutcheson, Siobhan Freeney, Flora Migyanka, Claire Turner, Patrick Derksen, Todd Bear, Christine Desmedt\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41523-024-00661-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is growing awareness of the unique etiology, biology, and clinical presentation of invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC), but additional research is needed to ensure translation of findings into management and treatment guidelines. We conducted a survey with input from breast cancer physicians, laboratory-based researchers, and patients to analyze the current understanding of ILC, and identify consensus research questions. 1774 participants from 66 countries respondents self-identified as clinicians (N = 413), researchers (N = 376), and breast cancer patients and advocates (N = 1120), with some belonging to more than one category. The majority of physicians reported being very/extremely (41%) to moderately (42%) confident in describing the differences between ILC and invasive breast cancer of no special type (NST). Knowledge of histology was seen as important (73%) and as affecting treatment decisions (51%), and most agreed that refining treatment guidelines would be valuable (76%). 85% of clinicians have never powered a clinical trial to allow subset analysis for histological subtypes, but the majority would consider it, and would participate in an ILC clinical trials consortium. The majority of laboratory researchers, reported being and very/extremely (48%) to moderately (29%) confident in describing differences between ILC and NST. They reported that ILCs are inadequately presented in large genomic data sets, and that ILC models are insufficient. The majority have adequate access to tissue or blood from patients with ILC. The majority of patients and advocates (52%) thought that their health care providers did not sufficiently explain the unique features of ILC. They identified improvement of ILC screening/early detection, and identification of better imaging tools as top research priorities. In contrast, both researchers and clinicians identified understanding of endocrine resistance and identifying novel drugs that can be tested in clinical trials as top research priority. In summary, we have gathered information from an international community of physicians, researchers, and patients/advocates that we expect will lay the foundation for a community-informed collaborative research agenda, with the goal of improving management and personalizing treatment for patients with ILC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Breast Cancer\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11271268/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Breast Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-024-00661-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-024-00661-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们对浸润性小叶乳腺癌(ILC)独特的病因学、生物学和临床表现有了越来越多的认识,但还需要进行更多的研究,以确保将研究结果转化为管理和治疗指南。我们进行了一项调查,听取了乳腺癌医生、实验室研究人员和患者的意见,以分析目前对 ILC 的认识,并确定共识研究问题。来自 66 个国家的 1774 名受访者自我认定为临床医生(413 人)、研究人员(376 人)、乳腺癌患者和倡导者(1120 人),其中有些人属于多个类别。大多数医生表示对描述 ILC 与无特殊类型的浸润性乳腺癌 (NST) 之间的差异非常/非常有信心(41%)到有信心(42%)。组织学知识被认为很重要(73%)并影响治疗决策(51%),大多数医生认为完善治疗指南很有价值(76%)。85%的临床医生从未推动过临床试验,以便对组织学亚型进行亚组分析,但大多数临床医生会考虑这样做,并会参加 ILC 临床试验联盟。大多数实验室研究人员表示,他们对描述 ILC 和 NST 之间的差异非常有信心(48%)到有信心(29%)。他们报告说,ILC 在大型基因组数据集中的表现并不充分,而且 ILC 模型也不够完善。大多数人都能充分获得 ILC 患者的组织或血液。大多数患者和倡导者(52%)认为,他们的医疗服务提供者没有充分解释 ILC 的独特特征。他们认为,改进 ILC 筛查/早期检测和确定更好的成像工具是研究的重中之重。相比之下,研究人员和临床医生都认为,了解内分泌抗药性和确定可在临床试验中测试的新型药物是研究的重中之重。总之,我们从国际医生、研究人员和患者/倡导者社区收集到的信息,有望为制定社区知情的合作研究议程奠定基础,从而改善 ILC 患者的管理和个性化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

International survey on invasive lobular breast cancer identifies priority research questions.

International survey on invasive lobular breast cancer identifies priority research questions.

There is growing awareness of the unique etiology, biology, and clinical presentation of invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC), but additional research is needed to ensure translation of findings into management and treatment guidelines. We conducted a survey with input from breast cancer physicians, laboratory-based researchers, and patients to analyze the current understanding of ILC, and identify consensus research questions. 1774 participants from 66 countries respondents self-identified as clinicians (N = 413), researchers (N = 376), and breast cancer patients and advocates (N = 1120), with some belonging to more than one category. The majority of physicians reported being very/extremely (41%) to moderately (42%) confident in describing the differences between ILC and invasive breast cancer of no special type (NST). Knowledge of histology was seen as important (73%) and as affecting treatment decisions (51%), and most agreed that refining treatment guidelines would be valuable (76%). 85% of clinicians have never powered a clinical trial to allow subset analysis for histological subtypes, but the majority would consider it, and would participate in an ILC clinical trials consortium. The majority of laboratory researchers, reported being and very/extremely (48%) to moderately (29%) confident in describing differences between ILC and NST. They reported that ILCs are inadequately presented in large genomic data sets, and that ILC models are insufficient. The majority have adequate access to tissue or blood from patients with ILC. The majority of patients and advocates (52%) thought that their health care providers did not sufficiently explain the unique features of ILC. They identified improvement of ILC screening/early detection, and identification of better imaging tools as top research priorities. In contrast, both researchers and clinicians identified understanding of endocrine resistance and identifying novel drugs that can be tested in clinical trials as top research priority. In summary, we have gathered information from an international community of physicians, researchers, and patients/advocates that we expect will lay the foundation for a community-informed collaborative research agenda, with the goal of improving management and personalizing treatment for patients with ILC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Breast Cancer
NPJ Breast Cancer Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Breast Cancer publishes original research articles, reviews, brief correspondence, meeting reports, editorial summaries and hypothesis generating observations which could be unexplained or preliminary findings from experiments, novel ideas, or the framing of new questions that need to be solved. Featured topics of the journal include imaging, immunotherapy, molecular classification of disease, mechanism-based therapies largely targeting signal transduction pathways, carcinogenesis including hereditary susceptibility and molecular epidemiology, survivorship issues including long-term toxicities of treatment and secondary neoplasm occurrence, the biophysics of cancer, mechanisms of metastasis and their perturbation, and studies of the tumor microenvironment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信