髋关节周围异位骨化的 "功能性切除术"--计算机断层扫描(CT)导航引导与传统切除术的比较分析。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1007/s00264-024-06256-8
Dhanasekaran Soundarrajan, Helawi Tewabe Fanta, Rithika Singh, Palanisami Dhanasekararaja, Natesan Rajkumar, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
{"title":"髋关节周围异位骨化的 \"功能性切除术\"--计算机断层扫描(CT)导航引导与传统切除术的比较分析。","authors":"Dhanasekaran Soundarrajan, Helawi Tewabe Fanta, Rithika Singh, Palanisami Dhanasekararaja, Natesan Rajkumar, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran","doi":"10.1007/s00264-024-06256-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aim to analyse and compare the efficacy of the excision of HO around the hip with and without CT-guided navigation. We also aim to compare the functional outcome between CT navigation guided versus conventional excision of HO.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 2015 to 2022. There were 23 patients (24 hips) in the final cohort. Intraoperative CT navigation guided excision was performed in 7 hips and conventional excision of HO was done in 17 hips. The HO was classified by Brooker's grading in radiographs. CT scan was taken preoperatively in all patients to exactly identify the volume, location and preoperative planning. The functional outcome was analysed according to Harris Hip Score (HHS) and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT) for self-ambulatory patients and improvement in the sitting or nursing care was assessed in patients mobilising with wheelchair or walker support. Any complications or recurrence noted postoperatively and in follow-up were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up was 41.2 months in the CT navigation-guided excision group and 55 months in the conventional excision group. According to Brooker's grading, grade IV was present in 20 hips and grade III in four hips. Twelve patients were self-ambulatory and the other 12 patients were requiring support for mobilisation. There was a significant improvement in the HHS from 21.3 ± 3.7, 18.3 ± 2.5 preoperatively to 75.2 ± 8.3, 72.2 ± 4.3 postoperatively in the CT navigation guided and conventional group respectively (p < 0.001) in the self-ambulatory group. There was one anterior wall and one partial posterior wall fracture in the conventional group. One patient in the conventional group had a deep infection and recurrence. One patient had a superficial infection and another had superficial vein thrombosis in the CT guided excision group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative CT navigation helps to exactly localize the HO and facilitates safe excision. Functional excision of the HO leads to better nursing care and functional outcomes between both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of 'functional excision' of heterotopic ossification around the hip - computed tomography (CT) navigation guided versus conventional excision.\",\"authors\":\"Dhanasekaran Soundarrajan, Helawi Tewabe Fanta, Rithika Singh, Palanisami Dhanasekararaja, Natesan Rajkumar, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00264-024-06256-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aim to analyse and compare the efficacy of the excision of HO around the hip with and without CT-guided navigation. We also aim to compare the functional outcome between CT navigation guided versus conventional excision of HO.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 2015 to 2022. There were 23 patients (24 hips) in the final cohort. Intraoperative CT navigation guided excision was performed in 7 hips and conventional excision of HO was done in 17 hips. The HO was classified by Brooker's grading in radiographs. CT scan was taken preoperatively in all patients to exactly identify the volume, location and preoperative planning. The functional outcome was analysed according to Harris Hip Score (HHS) and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT) for self-ambulatory patients and improvement in the sitting or nursing care was assessed in patients mobilising with wheelchair or walker support. Any complications or recurrence noted postoperatively and in follow-up were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up was 41.2 months in the CT navigation-guided excision group and 55 months in the conventional excision group. According to Brooker's grading, grade IV was present in 20 hips and grade III in four hips. Twelve patients were self-ambulatory and the other 12 patients were requiring support for mobilisation. There was a significant improvement in the HHS from 21.3 ± 3.7, 18.3 ± 2.5 preoperatively to 75.2 ± 8.3, 72.2 ± 4.3 postoperatively in the CT navigation guided and conventional group respectively (p < 0.001) in the self-ambulatory group. There was one anterior wall and one partial posterior wall fracture in the conventional group. One patient in the conventional group had a deep infection and recurrence. One patient had a superficial infection and another had superficial vein thrombosis in the CT guided excision group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative CT navigation helps to exactly localize the HO and facilitates safe excision. Functional excision of the HO leads to better nursing care and functional outcomes between both groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06256-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06256-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在分析和比较在CT导航下和不在CT导航下切除髋关节周围HO的疗效。我们还旨在比较CT导航与传统HO切除术的功能结果:本研究是对2015年至2022年收集的前瞻性数据进行的回顾性分析。最终队列中有23名患者(24个髋关节)。7个髋关节在术中CT导航引导下进行了HO切除术,17个髋关节进行了传统的HO切除术。HO根据X光片上的Brooker分级进行分类。所有患者术前都进行了CT扫描,以准确确定体积、位置和术前计划。根据哈里斯髋关节评分(Harris Hip Score,HHS)和国际髋关节结果工具(International Hip Outcome Tool,iHOT)分析了自主活动患者的功能结果,并评估了在轮椅或助行器支持下活动的患者在坐姿或护理方面的改善情况。记录术后和随访中发现的任何并发症或复发情况:CT 导航引导下切除术组的平均随访时间为 41.2 个月,传统切除术组为 55 个月。根据布鲁克分级,20 个髋关节为 IV 级,4 个为 III 级。12名患者可以自行行走,另外12名患者则需要辅助活动。CT 导航引导组和传统组的 HHS 分别从术前的 21.3 ± 3.7、18.3 ± 2.5 显著提高到术后的 75.2 ± 8.3、72.2 ± 4.3(P 结论:术中 CT 导航有助于准确定位髋关节的位置:术中 CT 导航有助于准确定位 HO,并促进安全切除。功能性切除 HO 使两组患者获得更好的护理和功能效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative analysis of 'functional excision' of heterotopic ossification around the hip - computed tomography (CT) navigation guided versus conventional excision.

Comparative analysis of 'functional excision' of heterotopic ossification around the hip - computed tomography (CT) navigation guided versus conventional excision.

Purpose: We aim to analyse and compare the efficacy of the excision of HO around the hip with and without CT-guided navigation. We also aim to compare the functional outcome between CT navigation guided versus conventional excision of HO.

Patients and methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 2015 to 2022. There were 23 patients (24 hips) in the final cohort. Intraoperative CT navigation guided excision was performed in 7 hips and conventional excision of HO was done in 17 hips. The HO was classified by Brooker's grading in radiographs. CT scan was taken preoperatively in all patients to exactly identify the volume, location and preoperative planning. The functional outcome was analysed according to Harris Hip Score (HHS) and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT) for self-ambulatory patients and improvement in the sitting or nursing care was assessed in patients mobilising with wheelchair or walker support. Any complications or recurrence noted postoperatively and in follow-up were recorded.

Results: The mean follow-up was 41.2 months in the CT navigation-guided excision group and 55 months in the conventional excision group. According to Brooker's grading, grade IV was present in 20 hips and grade III in four hips. Twelve patients were self-ambulatory and the other 12 patients were requiring support for mobilisation. There was a significant improvement in the HHS from 21.3 ± 3.7, 18.3 ± 2.5 preoperatively to 75.2 ± 8.3, 72.2 ± 4.3 postoperatively in the CT navigation guided and conventional group respectively (p < 0.001) in the self-ambulatory group. There was one anterior wall and one partial posterior wall fracture in the conventional group. One patient in the conventional group had a deep infection and recurrence. One patient had a superficial infection and another had superficial vein thrombosis in the CT guided excision group.

Conclusion: Intraoperative CT navigation helps to exactly localize the HO and facilitates safe excision. Functional excision of the HO leads to better nursing care and functional outcomes between both groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信