浸润性乳腺癌(无特殊类型)中的肿瘤萌芽:与病理预后因素的关系及两种不同评分系统的比较。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PATHOLOGY
Vinothika Sivamayuran, Harshima Disvini Wijesinghe, Roshana Constantine, Menaka Dilani Samarawickrama Lokuhetty
{"title":"浸润性乳腺癌(无特殊类型)中的肿瘤萌芽:与病理预后因素的关系及两种不同评分系统的比较。","authors":"Vinothika Sivamayuran, Harshima Disvini Wijesinghe, Roshana Constantine, Menaka Dilani Samarawickrama Lokuhetty","doi":"10.1177/10668969241260213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction.</i> In contrast to colorectal carcinoma, the significance of tumor budding in breast carcinoma is not established. The X20 objective which is used to assess tumor budding in colorectal carcinoma, is not widely available in countries with limited resources. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of tumor budding and its associations with pathological prognostic factors in invasive breast carcinoma-no special type (IBC-NST), and to assess the correlation between the tumor budding observed using ×20 and ×40 objectives. <i>Methods.</i> A total of 349 excision specimens of IBC-NST were studied. Tumor budding was defined as a single cell/cluster of up to 4 cells at the invasive front and was assessed in hotspots at the advancing edge of the tumor using ×20 and ×40 objectives. Tumor budding was categorized into low (<5/0.785 mm<sup>2</sup>), intermediate (5-9/0.785 mm<sup>2</sup>), and high budding (≥10/0.785 mm<sup>2</sup>) for ×20 objective and low (≤4/0.196 mm<sup>2</sup>) and high (≥5/0.196 mm<sup>2</sup>) for ×40 objective based on the number of buds per hotspot. The association between tumor budding and prognostic factors was analyzed with Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test, Kruskal-Wallis test, χ<sup>2</sup> test, and logistic regression. Correlation between tumor budding in ×20 and ×40 objectives was analyzed with Pearson correlation test. <i>Results.</i> The prevalence of tumor budding was 72.5%. There was a significant correlation between the number of buddings observed in ×40 objective and ×20 objective (0.958). High tumor budding observed in both objectives was significantly associated with size (<i>P</i> < .001), lymphovascular invasion (<i>P</i> < .001), perineural invasion (<i>P</i> < .001), lymph node status (<i>P</i> < .001), number of lymph nodes (<i>P</i> < .001), T stage (<i>P</i> < .001), and N stage (<i>P</i> < .001) on univariate analysis, but only lymph node positivity (<i>P</i> < .001) showed significant association on multivariate analysis. <i>Conclusion.</i> Tumor budding assessed with ×20 and ×40 objectives showed a significant correlation and was significantly associated lymph node metastasis on multivariate analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14416,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"309-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tumor Budding in Invasive Breast Carcinoma, No Special Type: Association With Pathological Prognostic Factors and Comparison of 2 Different Scoring Systems.\",\"authors\":\"Vinothika Sivamayuran, Harshima Disvini Wijesinghe, Roshana Constantine, Menaka Dilani Samarawickrama Lokuhetty\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10668969241260213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Introduction.</i> In contrast to colorectal carcinoma, the significance of tumor budding in breast carcinoma is not established. The X20 objective which is used to assess tumor budding in colorectal carcinoma, is not widely available in countries with limited resources. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of tumor budding and its associations with pathological prognostic factors in invasive breast carcinoma-no special type (IBC-NST), and to assess the correlation between the tumor budding observed using ×20 and ×40 objectives. <i>Methods.</i> A total of 349 excision specimens of IBC-NST were studied. Tumor budding was defined as a single cell/cluster of up to 4 cells at the invasive front and was assessed in hotspots at the advancing edge of the tumor using ×20 and ×40 objectives. Tumor budding was categorized into low (<5/0.785 mm<sup>2</sup>), intermediate (5-9/0.785 mm<sup>2</sup>), and high budding (≥10/0.785 mm<sup>2</sup>) for ×20 objective and low (≤4/0.196 mm<sup>2</sup>) and high (≥5/0.196 mm<sup>2</sup>) for ×40 objective based on the number of buds per hotspot. The association between tumor budding and prognostic factors was analyzed with Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test, Kruskal-Wallis test, χ<sup>2</sup> test, and logistic regression. Correlation between tumor budding in ×20 and ×40 objectives was analyzed with Pearson correlation test. <i>Results.</i> The prevalence of tumor budding was 72.5%. There was a significant correlation between the number of buddings observed in ×40 objective and ×20 objective (0.958). High tumor budding observed in both objectives was significantly associated with size (<i>P</i> < .001), lymphovascular invasion (<i>P</i> < .001), perineural invasion (<i>P</i> < .001), lymph node status (<i>P</i> < .001), number of lymph nodes (<i>P</i> < .001), T stage (<i>P</i> < .001), and N stage (<i>P</i> < .001) on univariate analysis, but only lymph node positivity (<i>P</i> < .001) showed significant association on multivariate analysis. <i>Conclusion.</i> Tumor budding assessed with ×20 and ×40 objectives showed a significant correlation and was significantly associated lymph node metastasis on multivariate analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Surgical Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"309-317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Surgical Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10668969241260213\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10668969241260213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言。与结直肠癌相比,乳腺癌中肿瘤出芽的重要性尚未确定。在资源有限的国家,用于评估结直肠癌肿瘤出芽的 X20 目标并不普及。本研究旨在确定浸润性乳腺癌(无特殊类型)(IBC-NST)中肿瘤出芽的发生率及其与病理预后因素的关系,并评估使用 ×20 和 ×40 物镜观察到的肿瘤出芽之间的相关性。研究方法共研究了349例IBC-NST切除标本。肿瘤萌芽被定义为侵袭前沿的单细胞/多达 4 个细胞的细胞簇,使用 ×20 和 ×40 物镜对肿瘤推进边缘的热点进行评估。根据每个热点的肿瘤芽数量,×20物镜下的肿瘤芽分为低芽(2)、中芽(5-9/0.785 mm2)和高芽(≥10/0.785 mm2),×40物镜下的肿瘤芽分为低芽(≤4/0.196 mm2)和高芽(≥5/0.196 mm2)。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验、Kruskal-Wallis 检验、χ2 检验和逻辑回归分析肿瘤出芽与预后因素之间的关系。Pearson相关性检验分析了×20和×40物镜下肿瘤出芽的相关性。结果肿瘤出芽的发生率为 72.5%。在×40物镜和×20物镜下观察到的肿瘤出芽数之间存在明显的相关性(0.958)。两种物镜下观察到的高肿瘤出芽率与肿瘤大小有明显相关性(P P P P P P P P P P 结论。用×20和×40物镜评估的肿瘤萌芽显示出显著的相关性,并且在多变量分析中与淋巴结转移有明显关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tumor Budding in Invasive Breast Carcinoma, No Special Type: Association With Pathological Prognostic Factors and Comparison of 2 Different Scoring Systems.

Introduction. In contrast to colorectal carcinoma, the significance of tumor budding in breast carcinoma is not established. The X20 objective which is used to assess tumor budding in colorectal carcinoma, is not widely available in countries with limited resources. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of tumor budding and its associations with pathological prognostic factors in invasive breast carcinoma-no special type (IBC-NST), and to assess the correlation between the tumor budding observed using ×20 and ×40 objectives. Methods. A total of 349 excision specimens of IBC-NST were studied. Tumor budding was defined as a single cell/cluster of up to 4 cells at the invasive front and was assessed in hotspots at the advancing edge of the tumor using ×20 and ×40 objectives. Tumor budding was categorized into low (<5/0.785 mm2), intermediate (5-9/0.785 mm2), and high budding (≥10/0.785 mm2) for ×20 objective and low (≤4/0.196 mm2) and high (≥5/0.196 mm2) for ×40 objective based on the number of buds per hotspot. The association between tumor budding and prognostic factors was analyzed with Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, χ2 test, and logistic regression. Correlation between tumor budding in ×20 and ×40 objectives was analyzed with Pearson correlation test. Results. The prevalence of tumor budding was 72.5%. There was a significant correlation between the number of buddings observed in ×40 objective and ×20 objective (0.958). High tumor budding observed in both objectives was significantly associated with size (P < .001), lymphovascular invasion (P < .001), perineural invasion (P < .001), lymph node status (P < .001), number of lymph nodes (P < .001), T stage (P < .001), and N stage (P < .001) on univariate analysis, but only lymph node positivity (P < .001) showed significant association on multivariate analysis. Conclusion. Tumor budding assessed with ×20 and ×40 objectives showed a significant correlation and was significantly associated lymph node metastasis on multivariate analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Surgical Pathology (IJSP) is a peer-reviewed journal published eight times a year, which offers original research and observations covering all major organ systems, timely reviews of new techniques and procedures, discussions of controversies in surgical pathology, case reports, and images in pathology. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信