通气效率受损的临床特征和相关因素:中国 ECOPD 研究的发现。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Zhishan Deng, Fan Wu, Qi Wan, Cuiqiong Dai, Lifei Lu, Jieqi Peng, Kunning Zhou, Xiaohui Wu, Gaoying Tang, Suyin Huang, Guannan Cai, Peiyu Huang, Zihui Wang, Youlan Zheng, Huajing Yang, Ningning Zhao, Shan Xiao, Xiang Wen, Ruiting Sun, Changli Yang, Yongqing Huang, Rongchang Chen, Yumin Zhou, Pixin Ran
{"title":"通气效率受损的临床特征和相关因素:中国 ECOPD 研究的发现。","authors":"Zhishan Deng, Fan Wu, Qi Wan, Cuiqiong Dai, Lifei Lu, Jieqi Peng, Kunning Zhou, Xiaohui Wu, Gaoying Tang, Suyin Huang, Guannan Cai, Peiyu Huang, Zihui Wang, Youlan Zheng, Huajing Yang, Ningning Zhao, Shan Xiao, Xiang Wen, Ruiting Sun, Changli Yang, Yongqing Huang, Rongchang Chen, Yumin Zhou, Pixin Ran","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impaired ventilatory efficiency during exercise is a predictor of mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, little is known about the clinical features and associated factors of impaired ventilatory efficiency in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional community-based study in China and collected demographic and clinical information, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, spirometry, and CT data. Impaired ventilatory efficiency was defined by a nadir ventilatory equivalent for CO<sub>2</sub> production above the upper limit of normal. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to explore the clinical features and associated factors of impaired ventilatory efficiency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analyses included 941 subjects, 702 (74.6%) of whom had normal ventilatory efficiency and 239 (25.4%) had impaired ventilatory efficiency. Participants with impaired ventilatory efficiency had more chronic respiratory symptoms, poorer lung function and exercise capacity, and more severe emphysema (natural logarithm transformation of the low-attenuation area of the lung with attenuation values below -950 Hounsfield units, logLAA<sub>-950</sub>: 0.19±0.65 vs -0.28±0.63, p<0.001) and air trapping (logLAA<sub>-856</sub>: 1.03±0.65 vs 0.68±0.70, p<0.001) than those with normal ventilatory efficiency. Older age (60-69 years, OR 3.10 (95% CI 1.33 to 7.21), p=0.009 and 70-80 years, OR 6.48 (95% CI 2.56 to 16.43), p<0.001 vs 40-49 years) and smoking (former, OR 3.19 (95% CI 1.29 to 7.86), p=0.012; current, OR 4.27 (95% CI 1.78 to 10.24), p=0.001 vs never) were identified as high risk factors of impaired ventilatory efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Impaired ventilatory efficiency was associated with poorer respiratory characteristics. Longitudinal studies are warranted to explore the progression of individuals with impaired ventilatory efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11261676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical features and associated factors of impaired ventilatory efficiency: findings from the ECOPD study in China.\",\"authors\":\"Zhishan Deng, Fan Wu, Qi Wan, Cuiqiong Dai, Lifei Lu, Jieqi Peng, Kunning Zhou, Xiaohui Wu, Gaoying Tang, Suyin Huang, Guannan Cai, Peiyu Huang, Zihui Wang, Youlan Zheng, Huajing Yang, Ningning Zhao, Shan Xiao, Xiang Wen, Ruiting Sun, Changli Yang, Yongqing Huang, Rongchang Chen, Yumin Zhou, Pixin Ran\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impaired ventilatory efficiency during exercise is a predictor of mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, little is known about the clinical features and associated factors of impaired ventilatory efficiency in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional community-based study in China and collected demographic and clinical information, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, spirometry, and CT data. Impaired ventilatory efficiency was defined by a nadir ventilatory equivalent for CO<sub>2</sub> production above the upper limit of normal. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to explore the clinical features and associated factors of impaired ventilatory efficiency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analyses included 941 subjects, 702 (74.6%) of whom had normal ventilatory efficiency and 239 (25.4%) had impaired ventilatory efficiency. Participants with impaired ventilatory efficiency had more chronic respiratory symptoms, poorer lung function and exercise capacity, and more severe emphysema (natural logarithm transformation of the low-attenuation area of the lung with attenuation values below -950 Hounsfield units, logLAA<sub>-950</sub>: 0.19±0.65 vs -0.28±0.63, p<0.001) and air trapping (logLAA<sub>-856</sub>: 1.03±0.65 vs 0.68±0.70, p<0.001) than those with normal ventilatory efficiency. Older age (60-69 years, OR 3.10 (95% CI 1.33 to 7.21), p=0.009 and 70-80 years, OR 6.48 (95% CI 2.56 to 16.43), p<0.001 vs 40-49 years) and smoking (former, OR 3.19 (95% CI 1.29 to 7.86), p=0.012; current, OR 4.27 (95% CI 1.78 to 10.24), p=0.001 vs never) were identified as high risk factors of impaired ventilatory efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Impaired ventilatory efficiency was associated with poorer respiratory characteristics. Longitudinal studies are warranted to explore the progression of individuals with impaired ventilatory efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11261676/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002320\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:运动时通气效率受损是慢性阻塞性肺病患者死亡的一个预测因素。然而,在中国,人们对通气效率受损的临床特征和相关因素知之甚少:我们在中国开展了一项基于社区的横断面研究,收集了人口统计学和临床信息、心肺运动测试、肺活量测定和 CT 数据。通气效率受损的定义是二氧化碳产生的最低通气当量高于正常值上限。多变量线性回归和逻辑回归模型用于探讨通气效率受损的临床特征和相关因素:最终分析包括 941 名受试者,其中 702 人(74.6%)通气效率正常,239 人(25.4%)通气效率受损。通气效率受损的受试者有更多的慢性呼吸道症状、更差的肺功能和运动能力以及更严重的肺气肿(衰减值低于-950 Hounsfield单位的肺低衰减面积的自然对数转换,logLAA-950:0.19±0.65 vs -0.28±0.63,p-856:1.03±0.65 vs 0.68±0.70,p结论:通气效率受损与较差的呼吸特征有关。有必要进行纵向研究,以探讨通气效率受损者的病情发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical features and associated factors of impaired ventilatory efficiency: findings from the ECOPD study in China.

Background: Impaired ventilatory efficiency during exercise is a predictor of mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, little is known about the clinical features and associated factors of impaired ventilatory efficiency in China.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional community-based study in China and collected demographic and clinical information, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, spirometry, and CT data. Impaired ventilatory efficiency was defined by a nadir ventilatory equivalent for CO2 production above the upper limit of normal. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to explore the clinical features and associated factors of impaired ventilatory efficiency.

Results: The final analyses included 941 subjects, 702 (74.6%) of whom had normal ventilatory efficiency and 239 (25.4%) had impaired ventilatory efficiency. Participants with impaired ventilatory efficiency had more chronic respiratory symptoms, poorer lung function and exercise capacity, and more severe emphysema (natural logarithm transformation of the low-attenuation area of the lung with attenuation values below -950 Hounsfield units, logLAA-950: 0.19±0.65 vs -0.28±0.63, p<0.001) and air trapping (logLAA-856: 1.03±0.65 vs 0.68±0.70, p<0.001) than those with normal ventilatory efficiency. Older age (60-69 years, OR 3.10 (95% CI 1.33 to 7.21), p=0.009 and 70-80 years, OR 6.48 (95% CI 2.56 to 16.43), p<0.001 vs 40-49 years) and smoking (former, OR 3.19 (95% CI 1.29 to 7.86), p=0.012; current, OR 4.27 (95% CI 1.78 to 10.24), p=0.001 vs never) were identified as high risk factors of impaired ventilatory efficiency.

Conclusions: Impaired ventilatory efficiency was associated with poorer respiratory characteristics. Longitudinal studies are warranted to explore the progression of individuals with impaired ventilatory efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信