三维解剖学应用程序 "完整解剖学 "作为物理治疗专业一年级学生功能解剖学课程的额外非必修学习工具的试点评估研究。

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Michael E. J. Stouthandel, Lena Van Beek, Joris Van de Velde, Carl Vangestel, Tom Van Hoof
{"title":"三维解剖学应用程序 \"完整解剖学 \"作为物理治疗专业一年级学生功能解剖学课程的额外非必修学习工具的试点评估研究。","authors":"Michael E. J. Stouthandel,&nbsp;Lena Van Beek,&nbsp;Joris Van de Velde,&nbsp;Carl Vangestel,&nbsp;Tom Van Hoof","doi":"10.1002/ase.2491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For this pilot study, the use of the digital 3D anatomy application Complete Anatomy was evaluated as a non-mandatory additional study tool throughout the semester. The aim of the study was to investigate if the Complete Anatomy usage time had an effect on final exam grades and how the app was used post-Covid19. This cross-sectional study asked first year bachelor/freshman university students of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences to fill out a questionnaire to gauge Complete Anatomy usage time, the student's exam results, and how the app was used, for example, in relation to other study tools. A positive correlation was found between the proportion of students that passed the final exam and the number of hours of Complete Anatomy usage (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> (4) = 0.94, <i>p</i> = 0.016). Compared to students who didn't use Complete Anatomy, these positive effects were observed when students used Complete Anatomy for at least 10 h (<i>p</i> = 0.04). The app was well-used with almost half of the respondents reporting &gt;10 h of usage time. The results from this study provide a good overview of how and how often Complete Anatomy is used. Although a positive correlation between the hours of use and the number of passing grades was found in this pilot study, a future study to prove the causality between these two factors is warranted to further investigate the effect of Complete Anatomy as an additional non-mandatory study tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"17 6","pages":"1336-1344"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pilot study for the evaluation of 3D anatomy application ‘Complete Anatomy’ as an additional non-mandatory study tool for the functional anatomy classes of first year physical therapy students\",\"authors\":\"Michael E. J. Stouthandel,&nbsp;Lena Van Beek,&nbsp;Joris Van de Velde,&nbsp;Carl Vangestel,&nbsp;Tom Van Hoof\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ase.2491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>For this pilot study, the use of the digital 3D anatomy application Complete Anatomy was evaluated as a non-mandatory additional study tool throughout the semester. The aim of the study was to investigate if the Complete Anatomy usage time had an effect on final exam grades and how the app was used post-Covid19. This cross-sectional study asked first year bachelor/freshman university students of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences to fill out a questionnaire to gauge Complete Anatomy usage time, the student's exam results, and how the app was used, for example, in relation to other study tools. A positive correlation was found between the proportion of students that passed the final exam and the number of hours of Complete Anatomy usage (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> (4) = 0.94, <i>p</i> = 0.016). Compared to students who didn't use Complete Anatomy, these positive effects were observed when students used Complete Anatomy for at least 10 h (<i>p</i> = 0.04). The app was well-used with almost half of the respondents reporting &gt;10 h of usage time. The results from this study provide a good overview of how and how often Complete Anatomy is used. Although a positive correlation between the hours of use and the number of passing grades was found in this pilot study, a future study to prove the causality between these two factors is warranted to further investigate the effect of Complete Anatomy as an additional non-mandatory study tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anatomical Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"1336-1344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anatomical Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2491\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2491","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项试点研究中,对数字 3D 解剖应用软件 Complete Anatomy 的使用情况进行了评估,将其作为整个学期的非强制性额外学习工具。研究的目的是调查 Complete Anatomy 的使用时间是否会对期末考试成绩产生影响,以及该应用程序在 Covid19 后的使用情况。这项横向研究要求物理治疗与康复科学专业的一年级本科生/大一学生填写一份调查问卷,以了解《完整解剖学》的使用时间、学生的考试成绩以及该应用程序的使用情况,例如与其他学习工具的关系。结果发现,通过期末考试的学生比例与使用《完整解剖学》的小时数呈正相关(rs (4) = 0.94, p = 0.016)。与不使用 Complete Anatomy 的学生相比,当学生使用 Complete Anatomy 至少 10 小时时,这些积极影响就会显现出来(p = 0.04)。该应用程序的使用率很高,几乎有一半的受访者表示使用时间超过了 10 小时。这项研究的结果很好地概括了 Complete Anatomy 的使用方式和频率。虽然在这项试验性研究中发现了使用时长与及格分数之间的正相关关系,但仍有必要在今后的研究中证明这两个因素之间的因果关系,以进一步调查 Complete Anatomy 作为额外的非强制性学习工具的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A pilot study for the evaluation of 3D anatomy application ‘Complete Anatomy’ as an additional non-mandatory study tool for the functional anatomy classes of first year physical therapy students

For this pilot study, the use of the digital 3D anatomy application Complete Anatomy was evaluated as a non-mandatory additional study tool throughout the semester. The aim of the study was to investigate if the Complete Anatomy usage time had an effect on final exam grades and how the app was used post-Covid19. This cross-sectional study asked first year bachelor/freshman university students of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences to fill out a questionnaire to gauge Complete Anatomy usage time, the student's exam results, and how the app was used, for example, in relation to other study tools. A positive correlation was found between the proportion of students that passed the final exam and the number of hours of Complete Anatomy usage (rs (4) = 0.94, p = 0.016). Compared to students who didn't use Complete Anatomy, these positive effects were observed when students used Complete Anatomy for at least 10 h (p = 0.04). The app was well-used with almost half of the respondents reporting >10 h of usage time. The results from this study provide a good overview of how and how often Complete Anatomy is used. Although a positive correlation between the hours of use and the number of passing grades was found in this pilot study, a future study to prove the causality between these two factors is warranted to further investigate the effect of Complete Anatomy as an additional non-mandatory study tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信