漂浮式处理湿地能否通过加强生物膜活动改善现有泻湖的脱氮?

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
{"title":"漂浮式处理湿地能否通过加强生物膜活动改善现有泻湖的脱氮?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Floating treatment wetlands (FTW) are an emerging Nature Based Solution that have exhibited promising nitrogen removal under different range of effluents pollutant concentrations. Despite the notable increase in the number of FTW studies in the last years, nitrogen (N) removal mechanisms within FTW have not been fully assessed. The present study aims to understand N removal in FTW and investigate their microbial biofilm activity through a pilot scale experiment for agri-food tertiary wastewater treatment. A conventional and a modified (with added cellular concrete (CC)) FTW were monitored over 7 months with respect to two control lagoons (conventional lagoons with or without CC hanging in the water column). Experimental results revealed that the best TN removal was achieved by the lagoon equipped with the modified FTW (20% mean removal increase compared to the conventional lagoon). Biofilm denitrification activity potential was up to 6.7–9.0 times higher within pilot lagoons equipped with FTW than that in control lagoon (LC without FTW), while nitrification activity potential was prominent in biofilms within the control pilot lagoons (exhibiting high dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration). Biofilms from plant roots exhibited the highest overall dissolved inorganic nitrogen treatment followed by the biofilms from sediments and CC material. Plant root biofilms exhibited both significant nitrification and denitrification activity potentials despite the overall low DO and COD concentrations within FTW pilot lagoons' water column. This suggests the existence of micro sites in the roots network which provide adequate aerobic conditions and access to organic carbon most probably through root exudates. Overall, N accumulation in the sediment was a minor removal mechanism for all pilot lagoons. Plant accumulation (accounting for one third of TN removal), nitrification and enhanced denitrification appeared to be the main removal mechanisms in pilot lagoons equipped with FTWs (with or without CC) while nitrification, algal assimilation and NH<sub>4</sub>-N volatilization may hav-èe been the major processes driving TN removal in the control pilot lagoons. Hence, FTW could be an interesting retrofit of existing lagoons to promote nitrogen removal through denitrification and plant assimilation, especially in the case of receiving bodies highly sensitive to nitrate input. Further research should address optimizing FTW design to guarantee stable N removal under changing water temperature and mitigate seasonal variations as well as investigate biofilm species for in-depth understanding of N cycle within FTWs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can floating treatment wetlands improve existing lagoons nitrogen removal through intensifying biofilm activity?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Floating treatment wetlands (FTW) are an emerging Nature Based Solution that have exhibited promising nitrogen removal under different range of effluents pollutant concentrations. Despite the notable increase in the number of FTW studies in the last years, nitrogen (N) removal mechanisms within FTW have not been fully assessed. The present study aims to understand N removal in FTW and investigate their microbial biofilm activity through a pilot scale experiment for agri-food tertiary wastewater treatment. A conventional and a modified (with added cellular concrete (CC)) FTW were monitored over 7 months with respect to two control lagoons (conventional lagoons with or without CC hanging in the water column). Experimental results revealed that the best TN removal was achieved by the lagoon equipped with the modified FTW (20% mean removal increase compared to the conventional lagoon). Biofilm denitrification activity potential was up to 6.7–9.0 times higher within pilot lagoons equipped with FTW than that in control lagoon (LC without FTW), while nitrification activity potential was prominent in biofilms within the control pilot lagoons (exhibiting high dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration). Biofilms from plant roots exhibited the highest overall dissolved inorganic nitrogen treatment followed by the biofilms from sediments and CC material. Plant root biofilms exhibited both significant nitrification and denitrification activity potentials despite the overall low DO and COD concentrations within FTW pilot lagoons' water column. This suggests the existence of micro sites in the roots network which provide adequate aerobic conditions and access to organic carbon most probably through root exudates. Overall, N accumulation in the sediment was a minor removal mechanism for all pilot lagoons. Plant accumulation (accounting for one third of TN removal), nitrification and enhanced denitrification appeared to be the main removal mechanisms in pilot lagoons equipped with FTWs (with or without CC) while nitrification, algal assimilation and NH<sub>4</sub>-N volatilization may hav-èe been the major processes driving TN removal in the control pilot lagoons. Hence, FTW could be an interesting retrofit of existing lagoons to promote nitrogen removal through denitrification and plant assimilation, especially in the case of receiving bodies highly sensitive to nitrate input. Further research should address optimizing FTW design to guarantee stable N removal under changing water temperature and mitigate seasonal variations as well as investigate biofilm species for in-depth understanding of N cycle within FTWs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001460\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001460","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

浮动处理湿地(FTW)是一种新兴的基于自然的解决方案,在不同范围的污水污染物浓度下都表现出良好的脱氮效果。尽管近年来对浮动处理沼泽地的研究数量显著增加,但尚未对其脱氮机制进行全面评估。本研究旨在通过农业食品三级废水处理的中试规模实验,了解 FTW 的脱氮情况,并研究其微生物生物膜的活性。在 7 个月的时间里,对传统的和改良的(添加了蜂窝混凝土 (CC))FTW 进行了监测。与两个对照泻湖(在水体中悬挂或不悬挂 CC 的传统泻湖)相比,对传统泻湖和改良泻湖(添加了蜂窝混凝土 (CC))进行了为期 7 个月的监测。实验结果表明,配备改良型 FTW 的泻湖对 TN 的去除率最高(与传统泻湖相比,平均去除率提高了 20%)。装有 FTW 的中试泻湖的生物膜反硝化活性潜力是对照泻湖(不装 FTW 的 LC)的 6.7-9.0 倍,而对照中试泻湖(溶解氧浓度较高)的生物膜硝化活性潜力突出。植物根部生物膜的总体溶解无机氮处理量最高,其次是沉积物生物膜和 CC 材料生物膜。尽管 FTW 试验泻湖水体中的溶解氧和化学需氧量浓度总体较低,但植物根部生物膜仍表现出显著的硝化和反硝化活动潜力。这表明根系网络中存在微小位点,可提供充足的有氧条件,并很可能通过根系渗出物获得有机碳。总体而言,沉积物中的氮累积是所有试点泻湖的一个次要去除机制。植物积累(占 TN 去除量的三分之一)、硝化和强化反硝化似乎是装有 FTW(带或不带 CC)的试验性泻湖的主要去除机制,而硝化、藻类同化和 NH4-N 挥发可能是驱动对照试验性泻湖 TN 去除的主要过程。因此,对现有泻湖进行 FTW 改造,通过反硝化和植物同化作用促进氮的去除,特别是在受纳体对硝酸盐输入高度敏感的情况下,可能是一种有趣的方法。进一步的研究应涉及优化 FTW 设计,以确保在水温变化的情况下稳定脱氮,并减缓季节性变化,同时研究生物膜物种,以深入了解 FTW 内的氮循环。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can floating treatment wetlands improve existing lagoons nitrogen removal through intensifying biofilm activity?

Floating treatment wetlands (FTW) are an emerging Nature Based Solution that have exhibited promising nitrogen removal under different range of effluents pollutant concentrations. Despite the notable increase in the number of FTW studies in the last years, nitrogen (N) removal mechanisms within FTW have not been fully assessed. The present study aims to understand N removal in FTW and investigate their microbial biofilm activity through a pilot scale experiment for agri-food tertiary wastewater treatment. A conventional and a modified (with added cellular concrete (CC)) FTW were monitored over 7 months with respect to two control lagoons (conventional lagoons with or without CC hanging in the water column). Experimental results revealed that the best TN removal was achieved by the lagoon equipped with the modified FTW (20% mean removal increase compared to the conventional lagoon). Biofilm denitrification activity potential was up to 6.7–9.0 times higher within pilot lagoons equipped with FTW than that in control lagoon (LC without FTW), while nitrification activity potential was prominent in biofilms within the control pilot lagoons (exhibiting high dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration). Biofilms from plant roots exhibited the highest overall dissolved inorganic nitrogen treatment followed by the biofilms from sediments and CC material. Plant root biofilms exhibited both significant nitrification and denitrification activity potentials despite the overall low DO and COD concentrations within FTW pilot lagoons' water column. This suggests the existence of micro sites in the roots network which provide adequate aerobic conditions and access to organic carbon most probably through root exudates. Overall, N accumulation in the sediment was a minor removal mechanism for all pilot lagoons. Plant accumulation (accounting for one third of TN removal), nitrification and enhanced denitrification appeared to be the main removal mechanisms in pilot lagoons equipped with FTWs (with or without CC) while nitrification, algal assimilation and NH4-N volatilization may hav-èe been the major processes driving TN removal in the control pilot lagoons. Hence, FTW could be an interesting retrofit of existing lagoons to promote nitrogen removal through denitrification and plant assimilation, especially in the case of receiving bodies highly sensitive to nitrate input. Further research should address optimizing FTW design to guarantee stable N removal under changing water temperature and mitigate seasonal variations as well as investigate biofilm species for in-depth understanding of N cycle within FTWs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信