牛肉生产、排放和土地利用影响之间的区域尺度权衡:从牛的日粮组成角度看

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. Wang , L. Puillet , C. Pinsard , P. Lescoat , F. Accatino
{"title":"牛肉生产、排放和土地利用影响之间的区域尺度权衡:从牛的日粮组成角度看","authors":"R. Wang ,&nbsp;L. Puillet ,&nbsp;C. Pinsard ,&nbsp;P. Lescoat ,&nbsp;F. Accatino","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>Although playing a role in global food security, beef production systems cause concerns due to pressure on land for feed production and greenhouse gas emissions.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>We aimed at quantifying the trade-offs associated with different beef cattle diet compositions, considering beef meat production, greenhouse gas emissions, and land use impacts. In addition, we evaluated the influence of dry periods and grazing improvement for trade-off mitigation.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>We developed a model linking beef cattle diet composition to land use impact indicators (feed import requirements and feed-food competition indicators), beef production (proxied by total weight gain [WG]), and animal emissions in a year. We applied the model to the grassland-based beef cattle region of Bourbonnais, France, with a three-step analysis: (i) we explored the model outputs over a joint range of cereal and grass intake; (ii) we investigated the sensitivity of each feed type intake on the outputs; (iii) we simulated scenarios representing situations affecting cattle diet: <em>dry seasons</em> (−20% average crop and grass yield, grazing time, cattle growth rate and less cattle grass intake compensated by an equivalent increase of other feed types)<em>, grazing improvement</em> (increasing grass yield by 20% and its digestibility and gross energy content by 5%) and <em>mixed</em> (combining the previous scenarios).</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Analysis (i) showed that more digestible diets conciliate production with emission reduction; however, they also cause undesired feed imports and feed-food competition. Analysis (ii) showed that, although present in the diet in relatively small quantities, oil protein crops as feed have high impact on model variables and outputs. In analysis (iii), compared to <em>baseline</em>, <em>dry seasons</em> decreases slightly in WG and emissions but increases feed-food competition (human-edible feed +149 g/kg WG) with extra feed importations; <em>Grazing improvement</em> increases WG (+6.02%) and decreases emissions (−3.03%), human-edible feed per WG (−37 g/kg WG) and food-competing land per WG (−5.7<span><math><mo>×</mo></math></span>10<sup>−5</sup> ha/kg WG) with no additional impact on feed imports; <em>mixed</em> scenario, increases total WG (+1.22%); decreases emissions (−3.25%) with less feed-food competition and less importation than <em>baseline</em> scenario.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>Beef cattle diet composition, linked to land-use based management practices, is an effective tool to handle the trade-offs at the regional scale. Improving pasture quality alleviates the trade-offs by increasing production, reducing emission, feed-food competition and feed imports. Improving resilience of grasslands to droughts alleviates the negative impacts of dietary changes during dry periods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 104048"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24001987/pdfft?md5=23c31e9f5f5f19b7beae0c8021e9fa58&pid=1-s2.0-S0308521X24001987-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional-scale trade-offs among beef production, emissions and land use impacts: A cattle diet composition perspective\",\"authors\":\"R. Wang ,&nbsp;L. Puillet ,&nbsp;C. Pinsard ,&nbsp;P. Lescoat ,&nbsp;F. Accatino\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>Although playing a role in global food security, beef production systems cause concerns due to pressure on land for feed production and greenhouse gas emissions.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>We aimed at quantifying the trade-offs associated with different beef cattle diet compositions, considering beef meat production, greenhouse gas emissions, and land use impacts. In addition, we evaluated the influence of dry periods and grazing improvement for trade-off mitigation.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>We developed a model linking beef cattle diet composition to land use impact indicators (feed import requirements and feed-food competition indicators), beef production (proxied by total weight gain [WG]), and animal emissions in a year. We applied the model to the grassland-based beef cattle region of Bourbonnais, France, with a three-step analysis: (i) we explored the model outputs over a joint range of cereal and grass intake; (ii) we investigated the sensitivity of each feed type intake on the outputs; (iii) we simulated scenarios representing situations affecting cattle diet: <em>dry seasons</em> (−20% average crop and grass yield, grazing time, cattle growth rate and less cattle grass intake compensated by an equivalent increase of other feed types)<em>, grazing improvement</em> (increasing grass yield by 20% and its digestibility and gross energy content by 5%) and <em>mixed</em> (combining the previous scenarios).</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Analysis (i) showed that more digestible diets conciliate production with emission reduction; however, they also cause undesired feed imports and feed-food competition. Analysis (ii) showed that, although present in the diet in relatively small quantities, oil protein crops as feed have high impact on model variables and outputs. In analysis (iii), compared to <em>baseline</em>, <em>dry seasons</em> decreases slightly in WG and emissions but increases feed-food competition (human-edible feed +149 g/kg WG) with extra feed importations; <em>Grazing improvement</em> increases WG (+6.02%) and decreases emissions (−3.03%), human-edible feed per WG (−37 g/kg WG) and food-competing land per WG (−5.7<span><math><mo>×</mo></math></span>10<sup>−5</sup> ha/kg WG) with no additional impact on feed imports; <em>mixed</em> scenario, increases total WG (+1.22%); decreases emissions (−3.25%) with less feed-food competition and less importation than <em>baseline</em> scenario.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>Beef cattle diet composition, linked to land-use based management practices, is an effective tool to handle the trade-offs at the regional scale. Improving pasture quality alleviates the trade-offs by increasing production, reducing emission, feed-food competition and feed imports. Improving resilience of grasslands to droughts alleviates the negative impacts of dietary changes during dry periods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"220 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104048\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24001987/pdfft?md5=23c31e9f5f5f19b7beae0c8021e9fa58&pid=1-s2.0-S0308521X24001987-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24001987\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24001987","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内容虽然肉牛生产系统在全球粮食安全中发挥着重要作用,但由于其对饲料生产用地的压力和温室气体排放,也引起了人们的关注。目标我们旨在量化不同肉牛日粮组成的权衡,同时考虑牛肉产量、温室气体排放和土地利用影响。我们建立了一个模型,将肉牛日粮组成与土地利用影响指标(饲料进口需求和饲料-食品竞争指标)、牛肉产量(以总增重[WG]表示)和一年中的动物排放量联系起来。我们将该模型应用于以草地为基础的法国布尔邦纳肉牛区,并分三步进行了分析:(i) 在谷物和草的共同摄入量范围内探索模型输出;(ii) 研究每种饲料摄入量对输出的敏感性;(iii) 模拟代表影响牛日粮情况的情景:旱季(作物和牧草平均产量、放牧时间、牛的生长速度降低 20%,牛的牧草采食量减少,但其他饲料种类的采食量也相应增加)、放牧改良(牧草产量增加 20%,其消化率和总能含量增加 5%)和混合(综合前几种情况)。结果和结论分析(i)表明,更易消化的日粮可兼顾生产和减排;但同时也会造成不必要的饲料进口和饲料-食品竞争。分析(二)表明,尽管油料作物作为饲料在日粮中的含量相对较小,但对模型变量和产出的影响很大。在分析(iii)中,与基线相比,旱季会略微减少 WG 和排放量,但会增加饲料-食物竞争(人类可食用饲料 +149 克/千克 WG),并带来额外的饲料进口;牧草改良会增加 WG(+6.02%),减少排放量(-3.03%)、每 WG 的人类可食用饲料(-37 克/千克 WG)和每 WG 的食物竞争土地(-5.意义肉牛日粮组成与基于土地利用的管理实践相关联,是在区域范围内处理权衡问题的有效工具。提高牧草质量可通过提高产量、减少排放、饲料竞争和饲料进口来缓解权衡问题。提高草地对干旱的适应能力可减轻干旱期饮食变化的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Regional-scale trade-offs among beef production, emissions and land use impacts: A cattle diet composition perspective

Regional-scale trade-offs among beef production, emissions and land use impacts: A cattle diet composition perspective

CONTEXT

Although playing a role in global food security, beef production systems cause concerns due to pressure on land for feed production and greenhouse gas emissions.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed at quantifying the trade-offs associated with different beef cattle diet compositions, considering beef meat production, greenhouse gas emissions, and land use impacts. In addition, we evaluated the influence of dry periods and grazing improvement for trade-off mitigation.

METHODS

We developed a model linking beef cattle diet composition to land use impact indicators (feed import requirements and feed-food competition indicators), beef production (proxied by total weight gain [WG]), and animal emissions in a year. We applied the model to the grassland-based beef cattle region of Bourbonnais, France, with a three-step analysis: (i) we explored the model outputs over a joint range of cereal and grass intake; (ii) we investigated the sensitivity of each feed type intake on the outputs; (iii) we simulated scenarios representing situations affecting cattle diet: dry seasons (−20% average crop and grass yield, grazing time, cattle growth rate and less cattle grass intake compensated by an equivalent increase of other feed types), grazing improvement (increasing grass yield by 20% and its digestibility and gross energy content by 5%) and mixed (combining the previous scenarios).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Analysis (i) showed that more digestible diets conciliate production with emission reduction; however, they also cause undesired feed imports and feed-food competition. Analysis (ii) showed that, although present in the diet in relatively small quantities, oil protein crops as feed have high impact on model variables and outputs. In analysis (iii), compared to baseline, dry seasons decreases slightly in WG and emissions but increases feed-food competition (human-edible feed +149 g/kg WG) with extra feed importations; Grazing improvement increases WG (+6.02%) and decreases emissions (−3.03%), human-edible feed per WG (−37 g/kg WG) and food-competing land per WG (−5.7×10−5 ha/kg WG) with no additional impact on feed imports; mixed scenario, increases total WG (+1.22%); decreases emissions (−3.25%) with less feed-food competition and less importation than baseline scenario.

SIGNIFICANCE

Beef cattle diet composition, linked to land-use based management practices, is an effective tool to handle the trade-offs at the regional scale. Improving pasture quality alleviates the trade-offs by increasing production, reducing emission, feed-food competition and feed imports. Improving resilience of grasslands to droughts alleviates the negative impacts of dietary changes during dry periods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信