Ming Liang, Haolin Qiu, Bing Ou, Jiayi Wu, Xinbao Zhao, Baoming Luo
{"title":"评估造影剂增强超声预测小细胞(≤4 厘米)透明细胞肾细胞癌的肿瘤分级:定性与定量分析","authors":"Ming Liang, Haolin Qiu, Bing Ou, Jiayi Wu, Xinbao Zhao, Baoming Luo","doi":"10.3233/CH-231990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the utility of qualitative and quantitative analysis employing contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in predicting the WHO/ISUP grade of small (≤4 cm) clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCCs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with small ccRCCs, confirmed by histological examination, underwent preoperative CEUS and were classified into low- (grade I/II) and high-grade (grade III/IV) groups. Qualitative and quantitative assessments of CEUS were conducted and compared between the two groups. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 72 patients were diagnosed with small ccRCCs, comprising 23 individuals in the high-grade group and 49 in the low-grade group. The low-grade group exhibited a significantly greater percentage of hyper-enhancement compared to the high-grade group (79.6% VS 39.1%, P < 0.05). The low-grade group showed significantly higher relative index values for peak enhancement, wash-in area under the curve, wash-in rate, wash-in perfusion index, and wash-out rate compared to the high-grade group (all P < 0.05). The AUC values for qualitative and quantitative parameters in predicting the WHO/ISUP grade of small ccRCCs ranged from 0.676 to 0.756.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both qualitative and quantitative CEUS analysis could help to distinguish the high- from low-grade small ccRCCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93943,"journal":{"name":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for predicting tumor grade in small (≤4 cm) clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Qualitative and quantitative analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ming Liang, Haolin Qiu, Bing Ou, Jiayi Wu, Xinbao Zhao, Baoming Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/CH-231990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the utility of qualitative and quantitative analysis employing contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in predicting the WHO/ISUP grade of small (≤4 cm) clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCCs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with small ccRCCs, confirmed by histological examination, underwent preoperative CEUS and were classified into low- (grade I/II) and high-grade (grade III/IV) groups. Qualitative and quantitative assessments of CEUS were conducted and compared between the two groups. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 72 patients were diagnosed with small ccRCCs, comprising 23 individuals in the high-grade group and 49 in the low-grade group. The low-grade group exhibited a significantly greater percentage of hyper-enhancement compared to the high-grade group (79.6% VS 39.1%, P < 0.05). The low-grade group showed significantly higher relative index values for peak enhancement, wash-in area under the curve, wash-in rate, wash-in perfusion index, and wash-out rate compared to the high-grade group (all P < 0.05). The AUC values for qualitative and quantitative parameters in predicting the WHO/ISUP grade of small ccRCCs ranged from 0.676 to 0.756.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both qualitative and quantitative CEUS analysis could help to distinguish the high- from low-grade small ccRCCs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-231990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-231990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的该研究旨在评估造影剂增强超声波(CEUS)的定性和定量分析在预测小型(≤4厘米)透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)的WHO/ISUP分级方面的实用性:经组织学检查确诊的小型ccRCC患者接受术前CEUS检查,并被分为低级别(I/II级)和高级别(III/IV级)两组。对CEUS进行定性和定量评估,并在两组之间进行比较。使用接收器操作特征曲线评估诊断效果:结果:共有72名患者被确诊为小型ccRCC,其中高级别组23人,低级别组49人。与高级别组相比,低级别组的高增强比例明显更高(79.6% VS 39.1%,P 结论:CEUS定性和定量CEUS均可用于诊断小型ccRCC:CEUS定性和定量分析有助于区分高级别和低级别小型ccRCC。
Evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for predicting tumor grade in small (≤4 cm) clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Qualitative and quantitative analysis.
Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the utility of qualitative and quantitative analysis employing contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in predicting the WHO/ISUP grade of small (≤4 cm) clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCCs).
Methods: Patients with small ccRCCs, confirmed by histological examination, underwent preoperative CEUS and were classified into low- (grade I/II) and high-grade (grade III/IV) groups. Qualitative and quantitative assessments of CEUS were conducted and compared between the two groups. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves.
Results: A total of 72 patients were diagnosed with small ccRCCs, comprising 23 individuals in the high-grade group and 49 in the low-grade group. The low-grade group exhibited a significantly greater percentage of hyper-enhancement compared to the high-grade group (79.6% VS 39.1%, P < 0.05). The low-grade group showed significantly higher relative index values for peak enhancement, wash-in area under the curve, wash-in rate, wash-in perfusion index, and wash-out rate compared to the high-grade group (all P < 0.05). The AUC values for qualitative and quantitative parameters in predicting the WHO/ISUP grade of small ccRCCs ranged from 0.676 to 0.756.
Conclusions: Both qualitative and quantitative CEUS analysis could help to distinguish the high- from low-grade small ccRCCs.