[以原则为导向的临床伦理咨询巴塞尔模式 2.0 :精神病学入门]。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nervenarzt Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1007/s00115-024-01710-9
Jan Schürmann, Charlotte Wetterauer, Anna Lisa Westermair, Manuel Trachsel
{"title":"[以原则为导向的临床伦理咨询巴塞尔模式 2.0 :精神病学入门]。","authors":"Jan Schürmann, Charlotte Wetterauer, Anna Lisa Westermair, Manuel Trachsel","doi":"10.1007/s00115-024-01710-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness of clinical ethics counselling in medicine in terms of satisfaction of the participants, support of ethical decision-making, perceived impact on clinical care, moral competence and quality of communication is now empirically well validated. In psychiatry, more and more institutions have structures for clinical ethics consultation as well; however, there is still a lack of evaluative accompanying research on the benefits and differential indications of the various forms and models of clinical ethics counselling in psychiatry.</p><p><strong>Aim of the work: </strong>The article presents the principles and the step by step application of the principle-oriented clinical ethics consultation according to the Basel model 2.0.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The article is based on material and procedures developed at the Clinical Ethics Unit of the University Hospital Basel and the University Psychiatric Clinics Basel for the principle-oriented clinical ethics consultation according to the Basel model 2.0.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Principle-oriented clinical ethics consultation according to the Basel model 2.0 is suitable for dealing with moral issues and conflicts in psychiatric practice and for their ethical reflection; however, further evaluative accompanying research is needed on the benefits and differential indications of this and other models of clinical ethics support in psychiatry.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":"1033-1042"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11525241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The Basel model of principle-oriented clinical ethics consultation 2.0 : An introduction for psychiatry].\",\"authors\":\"Jan Schürmann, Charlotte Wetterauer, Anna Lisa Westermair, Manuel Trachsel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00115-024-01710-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness of clinical ethics counselling in medicine in terms of satisfaction of the participants, support of ethical decision-making, perceived impact on clinical care, moral competence and quality of communication is now empirically well validated. In psychiatry, more and more institutions have structures for clinical ethics consultation as well; however, there is still a lack of evaluative accompanying research on the benefits and differential indications of the various forms and models of clinical ethics counselling in psychiatry.</p><p><strong>Aim of the work: </strong>The article presents the principles and the step by step application of the principle-oriented clinical ethics consultation according to the Basel model 2.0.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The article is based on material and procedures developed at the Clinical Ethics Unit of the University Hospital Basel and the University Psychiatric Clinics Basel for the principle-oriented clinical ethics consultation according to the Basel model 2.0.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Principle-oriented clinical ethics consultation according to the Basel model 2.0 is suitable for dealing with moral issues and conflicts in psychiatric practice and for their ethical reflection; however, further evaluative accompanying research is needed on the benefits and differential indications of this and other models of clinical ethics support in psychiatry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nervenarzt\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1033-1042\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11525241/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nervenarzt\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-024-01710-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-024-01710-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:从参与者的满意度、对伦理决策的支持、对临床护理的影响、道德能力和沟通质量等方面来看,医学临床伦理咨询的有效性现已得到充分的经验验证。在精神病学领域,越来越多的机构也设立了临床伦理咨询机构;然而,对于精神病学领域各种形式和模式的临床伦理咨询的益处和差异指标,仍然缺乏相应的评估研究:文章介绍了根据巴塞尔模式 2.0 以原则为导向的临床伦理咨询的原则和应用步骤:文章基于巴塞尔大学医院临床伦理部和巴塞尔大学精神病诊所根据巴塞尔模式 2.0 制定的以原则为导向的临床伦理咨询的材料和程序:根据巴塞尔模式 2.0,以原则为导向的临床伦理咨询适用于处理精神科实践中的道德问题和冲突,并对其进行伦理反思;然而,还需要对该模式和其他精神科临床伦理支持模式的益处和不同适应症进行进一步的评估研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The Basel model of principle-oriented clinical ethics consultation 2.0 : An introduction for psychiatry].

Background: The effectiveness of clinical ethics counselling in medicine in terms of satisfaction of the participants, support of ethical decision-making, perceived impact on clinical care, moral competence and quality of communication is now empirically well validated. In psychiatry, more and more institutions have structures for clinical ethics consultation as well; however, there is still a lack of evaluative accompanying research on the benefits and differential indications of the various forms and models of clinical ethics counselling in psychiatry.

Aim of the work: The article presents the principles and the step by step application of the principle-oriented clinical ethics consultation according to the Basel model 2.0.

Material and methods: The article is based on material and procedures developed at the Clinical Ethics Unit of the University Hospital Basel and the University Psychiatric Clinics Basel for the principle-oriented clinical ethics consultation according to the Basel model 2.0.

Results and discussion: Principle-oriented clinical ethics consultation according to the Basel model 2.0 is suitable for dealing with moral issues and conflicts in psychiatric practice and for their ethical reflection; however, further evaluative accompanying research is needed on the benefits and differential indications of this and other models of clinical ethics support in psychiatry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nervenarzt
Nervenarzt 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信