{"title":"兽医眼科中双手白内障手术的论据。","authors":"Kimberly Hsu, Enry Garcia da Silva","doi":"10.1111/vop.13244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite access to contemporary phacoemulsification technology and the strong shift to two-handed nucleofractis techniques in human medicine, a one-handed, single incision approach has persisted among Diplomates of the American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists. The perpetuation of techniques such as bowl-sculpting one-handed phacoemulsification in veterinary medicine is multifactorial; it is likely associated with the lack of two-handed training in residency programs, the challenges of learning on complex cases, the ease of teaching one-handed versus two-handed techniques to a resident, and the lack of specific instrumentation available designed for larger lens size, among other factors. Additionally, variation in globe and palpebral fissure size in veterinary patients complicates the training of cataract surgery. Finally, many mentors or mentors' mentors, were trained alongside previous generations of MD surgeons who performed bowl sculpting techniques during the transition from extracapsular cataract extraction to phacoemulsification, and understandably, are not comfortable teaching a two-handed technique consistently. The authors have observed an unwillingness to convert from one-handed to two-handed technique in the post-residency career for most veterinary ophthalmologists; this could be due to the high expectations becoming a specialist, especially when the stakes are as high as in phacoemulsification. Therefore, the authors advocate for hands-on training in multiple nucleofractis techniques, including two-handed methods during residency training. Simply put, if residents are not trained and comfortable with two-handed techniques by the end of residency, they are less likely to make further changes later in their career. In this article, we aim to explore the proposed rates of one-handed versus two-handed mentors currently teaching veterinary phacoemulsification, the history of cataract surgery, and to discuss the benefits of two-handed nucleofractis techniques. The authors will also illustrate and provide videos as well as some tools for veterinary ophthalmologists wishing to learn two-handed techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":23836,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The argument for two-handed cataract surgery in veterinary ophthalmology.\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly Hsu, Enry Garcia da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vop.13244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite access to contemporary phacoemulsification technology and the strong shift to two-handed nucleofractis techniques in human medicine, a one-handed, single incision approach has persisted among Diplomates of the American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists. The perpetuation of techniques such as bowl-sculpting one-handed phacoemulsification in veterinary medicine is multifactorial; it is likely associated with the lack of two-handed training in residency programs, the challenges of learning on complex cases, the ease of teaching one-handed versus two-handed techniques to a resident, and the lack of specific instrumentation available designed for larger lens size, among other factors. Additionally, variation in globe and palpebral fissure size in veterinary patients complicates the training of cataract surgery. Finally, many mentors or mentors' mentors, were trained alongside previous generations of MD surgeons who performed bowl sculpting techniques during the transition from extracapsular cataract extraction to phacoemulsification, and understandably, are not comfortable teaching a two-handed technique consistently. The authors have observed an unwillingness to convert from one-handed to two-handed technique in the post-residency career for most veterinary ophthalmologists; this could be due to the high expectations becoming a specialist, especially when the stakes are as high as in phacoemulsification. Therefore, the authors advocate for hands-on training in multiple nucleofractis techniques, including two-handed methods during residency training. Simply put, if residents are not trained and comfortable with two-handed techniques by the end of residency, they are less likely to make further changes later in their career. In this article, we aim to explore the proposed rates of one-handed versus two-handed mentors currently teaching veterinary phacoemulsification, the history of cataract surgery, and to discuss the benefits of two-handed nucleofractis techniques. The authors will also illustrate and provide videos as well as some tools for veterinary ophthalmologists wishing to learn two-handed techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vop.13244\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vop.13244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The argument for two-handed cataract surgery in veterinary ophthalmology.
Despite access to contemporary phacoemulsification technology and the strong shift to two-handed nucleofractis techniques in human medicine, a one-handed, single incision approach has persisted among Diplomates of the American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists. The perpetuation of techniques such as bowl-sculpting one-handed phacoemulsification in veterinary medicine is multifactorial; it is likely associated with the lack of two-handed training in residency programs, the challenges of learning on complex cases, the ease of teaching one-handed versus two-handed techniques to a resident, and the lack of specific instrumentation available designed for larger lens size, among other factors. Additionally, variation in globe and palpebral fissure size in veterinary patients complicates the training of cataract surgery. Finally, many mentors or mentors' mentors, were trained alongside previous generations of MD surgeons who performed bowl sculpting techniques during the transition from extracapsular cataract extraction to phacoemulsification, and understandably, are not comfortable teaching a two-handed technique consistently. The authors have observed an unwillingness to convert from one-handed to two-handed technique in the post-residency career for most veterinary ophthalmologists; this could be due to the high expectations becoming a specialist, especially when the stakes are as high as in phacoemulsification. Therefore, the authors advocate for hands-on training in multiple nucleofractis techniques, including two-handed methods during residency training. Simply put, if residents are not trained and comfortable with two-handed techniques by the end of residency, they are less likely to make further changes later in their career. In this article, we aim to explore the proposed rates of one-handed versus two-handed mentors currently teaching veterinary phacoemulsification, the history of cataract surgery, and to discuss the benefits of two-handed nucleofractis techniques. The authors will also illustrate and provide videos as well as some tools for veterinary ophthalmologists wishing to learn two-handed techniques.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, international journal that welcomes submission of manuscripts directed towards academic researchers of veterinary ophthalmology, specialists and general practitioners with a strong ophthalmology interest. Articles include those relating to all aspects of:
Clinical and investigational veterinary and comparative ophthalmology;
Prospective and retrospective studies or reviews of naturally occurring ocular disease in veterinary species;
Experimental models of both animal and human ocular disease in veterinary species;
Anatomic studies of the animal eye;
Physiological studies of the animal eye;
Pharmacological studies of the animal eye.