{"title":"消费者是否愿意为众包式电子购物支付额外费用?发展中经济体的混合选择分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2024.104177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents the results of a behavioral study on consumers’ willingness-to-pay the extra for e-grocery deliveries based on crowd-shipping. The proposed methodology was tested for Ukraine, i.e., a developing country where the crowd-shipping services are under development conditions. The choice model was enhanced with two latent variables to account for the behavior complexity of the consumers who have not faced crowd-shipping services in the past. These variables were extracted through factor analysis to encompass pro-crowd-shipping and pro-commercial carrier attributes. The willingness-to-pay for e-grocery deliveries based on crowd-shipping and commercial carriers was estimated using hybrid choice modeling results. The findings indicate more than two times higher willingness-to-pay for saving delivery time for crowd-shipping compared to commercial carrier services. Discrete choice analysis of consumer-related attributes identified males with cons-crowd-shipping attitudes. Age-wise, consumers younger than 30 years exhibited pro-crowd-shipping behavior. The direct and cross elasticities have been estimated to evaluate the impacts of variation in service-specific attributes on the consumer’s behavior within e-groceries scope.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424002258/pdfft?md5=acb76d4ab3c7aada00deab37e9410c73&pid=1-s2.0-S0965856424002258-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are consumers ready to pay extra for crowd-shipping e-groceries and why? A hybrid choice analysis for developing economies\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tra.2024.104177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper presents the results of a behavioral study on consumers’ willingness-to-pay the extra for e-grocery deliveries based on crowd-shipping. The proposed methodology was tested for Ukraine, i.e., a developing country where the crowd-shipping services are under development conditions. The choice model was enhanced with two latent variables to account for the behavior complexity of the consumers who have not faced crowd-shipping services in the past. These variables were extracted through factor analysis to encompass pro-crowd-shipping and pro-commercial carrier attributes. The willingness-to-pay for e-grocery deliveries based on crowd-shipping and commercial carriers was estimated using hybrid choice modeling results. The findings indicate more than two times higher willingness-to-pay for saving delivery time for crowd-shipping compared to commercial carrier services. Discrete choice analysis of consumer-related attributes identified males with cons-crowd-shipping attitudes. Age-wise, consumers younger than 30 years exhibited pro-crowd-shipping behavior. The direct and cross elasticities have been estimated to evaluate the impacts of variation in service-specific attributes on the consumer’s behavior within e-groceries scope.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424002258/pdfft?md5=acb76d4ab3c7aada00deab37e9410c73&pid=1-s2.0-S0965856424002258-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424002258\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424002258","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are consumers ready to pay extra for crowd-shipping e-groceries and why? A hybrid choice analysis for developing economies
This paper presents the results of a behavioral study on consumers’ willingness-to-pay the extra for e-grocery deliveries based on crowd-shipping. The proposed methodology was tested for Ukraine, i.e., a developing country where the crowd-shipping services are under development conditions. The choice model was enhanced with two latent variables to account for the behavior complexity of the consumers who have not faced crowd-shipping services in the past. These variables were extracted through factor analysis to encompass pro-crowd-shipping and pro-commercial carrier attributes. The willingness-to-pay for e-grocery deliveries based on crowd-shipping and commercial carriers was estimated using hybrid choice modeling results. The findings indicate more than two times higher willingness-to-pay for saving delivery time for crowd-shipping compared to commercial carrier services. Discrete choice analysis of consumer-related attributes identified males with cons-crowd-shipping attitudes. Age-wise, consumers younger than 30 years exhibited pro-crowd-shipping behavior. The direct and cross elasticities have been estimated to evaluate the impacts of variation in service-specific attributes on the consumer’s behavior within e-groceries scope.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions.
Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.