多污染物分配和补偿方案:考虑材料平衡原则的新方法

IF 6.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY
{"title":"多污染物分配和补偿方案:考虑材料平衡原则的新方法","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The absolute cap policy has been widely used to alleviate environmental pollution. However, two practical problems must be solved to formulate effective absolute cap policies. First, there is always a conflict between efficiency and fairness. Second, the allocation scheme is often infeasible without considering the materials balance (MB) principle, especially in multi-pollutant scenarios. The MB principle comes from the physics field and requires that the mass of inputs is equal to the mass of both desired and undesired outputs. To address these two problems, this paper proposes joint allocation and compensation schemes in multi-pollutant scenarios based on the MB principle. The new approach can simultaneously satisfy efficiency and fairness principles and improve the feasibility and accuracy of allocation and compensation schemes. A case of China's thermal power industry is used to demonstrate the approach. These results indicate that the principles of efficiency and fairness can be satisfied simultaneously by the combination of the allocation scheme and compensation scheme. If the MB principle is not considered, the abatement potential and potential benefit may be overestimated, and the allocation scheme is infeasible for most provinces. Moreover, the compensation amounts may be significantly underestimated without the MB principle.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-pollutants allocation and compensation schemes: A new approach considering materials balance principle\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The absolute cap policy has been widely used to alleviate environmental pollution. However, two practical problems must be solved to formulate effective absolute cap policies. First, there is always a conflict between efficiency and fairness. Second, the allocation scheme is often infeasible without considering the materials balance (MB) principle, especially in multi-pollutant scenarios. The MB principle comes from the physics field and requires that the mass of inputs is equal to the mass of both desired and undesired outputs. To address these two problems, this paper proposes joint allocation and compensation schemes in multi-pollutant scenarios based on the MB principle. The new approach can simultaneously satisfy efficiency and fairness principles and improve the feasibility and accuracy of allocation and compensation schemes. A case of China's thermal power industry is used to demonstrate the approach. These results indicate that the principles of efficiency and fairness can be satisfied simultaneously by the combination of the allocation scheme and compensation scheme. If the MB principle is not considered, the abatement potential and potential benefit may be overestimated, and the allocation scheme is infeasible for most provinces. Moreover, the compensation amounts may be significantly underestimated without the MB principle.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002064\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绝对上限政策已被广泛用于缓解环境污染。然而,要制定有效的绝对上限政策,必须解决两个实际问题。首先,效率与公平之间总是存在冲突。其次,如果不考虑物料平衡(MB)原则,分配方案往往是不可行的,尤其是在多污染物情况下。MB 原则来自物理学领域,要求输入的质量等于期望输出和不期望输出的质量。为解决这两个问题,本文基于 MB 原理提出了多污染物情况下的联合分配和补偿方案。新方法可同时满足效率和公平原则,提高分配和补偿方案的可行性和准确性。本文以中国火电行业为例,对该方法进行了论证。这些结果表明,分配方案和补偿方案的组合可以同时满足效率和公平原则。如果不考虑甲基溴原则,减排潜力和潜在效益可能会被高估,分配方案对大多数省份来说是不可行的。此外,如果不考虑甲基溴原则,补偿金额可能会被大大低估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-pollutants allocation and compensation schemes: A new approach considering materials balance principle

The absolute cap policy has been widely used to alleviate environmental pollution. However, two practical problems must be solved to formulate effective absolute cap policies. First, there is always a conflict between efficiency and fairness. Second, the allocation scheme is often infeasible without considering the materials balance (MB) principle, especially in multi-pollutant scenarios. The MB principle comes from the physics field and requires that the mass of inputs is equal to the mass of both desired and undesired outputs. To address these two problems, this paper proposes joint allocation and compensation schemes in multi-pollutant scenarios based on the MB principle. The new approach can simultaneously satisfy efficiency and fairness principles and improve the feasibility and accuracy of allocation and compensation schemes. A case of China's thermal power industry is used to demonstrate the approach. These results indicate that the principles of efficiency and fairness can be satisfied simultaneously by the combination of the allocation scheme and compensation scheme. If the MB principle is not considered, the abatement potential and potential benefit may be overestimated, and the allocation scheme is infeasible for most provinces. Moreover, the compensation amounts may be significantly underestimated without the MB principle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信