Kamran Mahmood, Lindsy Frazer-Green, Anne V Gonzalez, Scott L Shofer, Angela Christine Argento, Ian Welsby, Russell Hales, Samira Shojaee, Donna D Gardner, Joe Y Chang, Felix J F Herth, Lonny Yarmus
{"title":"中央气道阻塞的处理。美国胸科医师学会临床实践指南》。","authors":"Kamran Mahmood, Lindsy Frazer-Green, Anne V Gonzalez, Scott L Shofer, Angela Christine Argento, Ian Welsby, Russell Hales, Samira Shojaee, Donna D Gardner, Joe Y Chang, Felix J F Herth, Lonny Yarmus","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central airway obstruction (CAO), seen in a variety of malignant and nonmalignant airway disorders, is associated with a poor prognosis. The management of CAO is dependent on provider training and local resources, which may make the clinical approach and outcomes highly variable. We reviewed the current literature and provided evidence-based recommendations for the management of CAO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary expert panel developed key questions using the Patient, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcomes format and conducted a systematic literature search using MEDLINE (PubMed) and the Cochrane Library. The panel screened references for inclusion and used vetted evaluation tools to assess the quality of included studies and extract data, and graded the level of evidence supporting each recommendation. A modified Delphi technique was used to reach consensus on recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9,688 abstracts were reviewed, 150 full-text articles were assessed, and 31 studies were included in the analysis. One good practice statement and 10 graded recommendations were developed. The overall certainty of evidence was very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapeutic bronchoscopy can improve the symptoms, quality of life, and survival of patients with malignant and nonmalignant CAO. Multi-modality therapeutic options, including rigid bronchoscopy with general anesthesia, tumor/tissue debridement, ablation, dilation, and stent placement, should be utilized when appropriate. Therapeutic options and outcomes are dependent on the underlying etiology of CAO. A multidisciplinary approach and shared decision-making with the patient are strongly encouraged.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":"283-295"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Central Airway Obstruction: An American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline.\",\"authors\":\"Kamran Mahmood, Lindsy Frazer-Green, Anne V Gonzalez, Scott L Shofer, Angela Christine Argento, Ian Welsby, Russell Hales, Samira Shojaee, Donna D Gardner, Joe Y Chang, Felix J F Herth, Lonny Yarmus\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central airway obstruction (CAO), seen in a variety of malignant and nonmalignant airway disorders, is associated with a poor prognosis. The management of CAO is dependent on provider training and local resources, which may make the clinical approach and outcomes highly variable. We reviewed the current literature and provided evidence-based recommendations for the management of CAO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary expert panel developed key questions using the Patient, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcomes format and conducted a systematic literature search using MEDLINE (PubMed) and the Cochrane Library. The panel screened references for inclusion and used vetted evaluation tools to assess the quality of included studies and extract data, and graded the level of evidence supporting each recommendation. A modified Delphi technique was used to reach consensus on recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9,688 abstracts were reviewed, 150 full-text articles were assessed, and 31 studies were included in the analysis. One good practice statement and 10 graded recommendations were developed. The overall certainty of evidence was very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapeutic bronchoscopy can improve the symptoms, quality of life, and survival of patients with malignant and nonmalignant CAO. Multi-modality therapeutic options, including rigid bronchoscopy with general anesthesia, tumor/tissue debridement, ablation, dilation, and stent placement, should be utilized when appropriate. Therapeutic options and outcomes are dependent on the underlying etiology of CAO. A multidisciplinary approach and shared decision-making with the patient are strongly encouraged.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"283-295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3804\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3804","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:中央气道阻塞(CAO)见于各种恶性和非恶性气道疾病,预后不良。CAO 的治疗取决于医疗服务提供者的培训和当地资源,这可能会使临床治疗方法和结果存在很大差异。我们回顾了当前的文献,并为 CAO 的管理提供了循证建议:一个多学科专家小组采用 PICO(患者、干预、比较者和结果)格式提出了关键问题,并使用 MEDLINE (PubMed) 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了系统的文献检索。专家小组对纳入的参考文献进行筛选,使用经过审核的评估工具对纳入研究的质量进行评估并提取数据,同时对支持每项建议的证据水平进行分级。小组采用改良的德尔菲技术就建议达成共识:共查阅了 968 份摘要,评估了 150 篇全文,31 项研究被纳入分析。制定了一项良好实践声明和十项分级建议。总体证据的确定性很低:结论:治疗性支气管镜检查可改善恶性和非恶性 CAO 患者的症状、生活质量和存活率。在适当的时候,应采用多种治疗方法,包括全身麻醉下的硬质支气管镜检查、肿瘤/组织清创、消融、扩张和支架置入。治疗方案和效果取决于 CAO 的潜在病因。强烈建议采用多学科方法并与患者共同决策。
Management of Central Airway Obstruction: An American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline.
Background: Central airway obstruction (CAO), seen in a variety of malignant and nonmalignant airway disorders, is associated with a poor prognosis. The management of CAO is dependent on provider training and local resources, which may make the clinical approach and outcomes highly variable. We reviewed the current literature and provided evidence-based recommendations for the management of CAO.
Methods: A multidisciplinary expert panel developed key questions using the Patient, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcomes format and conducted a systematic literature search using MEDLINE (PubMed) and the Cochrane Library. The panel screened references for inclusion and used vetted evaluation tools to assess the quality of included studies and extract data, and graded the level of evidence supporting each recommendation. A modified Delphi technique was used to reach consensus on recommendations.
Results: A total of 9,688 abstracts were reviewed, 150 full-text articles were assessed, and 31 studies were included in the analysis. One good practice statement and 10 graded recommendations were developed. The overall certainty of evidence was very low.
Conclusions: Therapeutic bronchoscopy can improve the symptoms, quality of life, and survival of patients with malignant and nonmalignant CAO. Multi-modality therapeutic options, including rigid bronchoscopy with general anesthesia, tumor/tissue debridement, ablation, dilation, and stent placement, should be utilized when appropriate. Therapeutic options and outcomes are dependent on the underlying etiology of CAO. A multidisciplinary approach and shared decision-making with the patient are strongly encouraged.
期刊介绍:
At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.