脚踝运动对静脉回流的影响:比较研究

Phlebology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1177/02683555241264914
Yun Cao, JinFeng He, Xufeng Chen, Lei Jing, JiaWen Qiu, YuJuan Geng, Feng Chen, GuoZhen Sun, XueLi Ji
{"title":"脚踝运动对静脉回流的影响:比较研究","authors":"Yun Cao, JinFeng He, Xufeng Chen, Lei Jing, JiaWen Qiu, YuJuan Geng, Feng Chen, GuoZhen Sun, XueLi Ji","doi":"10.1177/02683555241264914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the haemodynamic effects of different ankle movements combined ankle and toe movements on the femoral vein of the lower extremity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>28 healthy volunteers participated in the study. Doppler ultrasound was used to measure peak systolic velocity and time-averaged mean velocity of the common femoral vein during ankle dorsiflexion, ankle dorsiflexion with simultaneous toe extension, ankle plantarflexion, and ankle plantarflexion with simultaneous toe flexion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison to the resting state, both ankle alone or ankle combined with toe movement showed statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> < .01). However, there were no significant difference in the velocity of the common femoral vein between ankle alone and ankle combined with toe movement (<i>p</i> > .05). It is noteworthy that dorsiflexion of the ankle resulted in the highest peak velocity of blood flow.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The impact of ankle movement, with or without toe movement, the velocity of the common femoral vein is not significantly correlated.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"676-682"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of ankle movements on venous return flow: A comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Yun Cao, JinFeng He, Xufeng Chen, Lei Jing, JiaWen Qiu, YuJuan Geng, Feng Chen, GuoZhen Sun, XueLi Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02683555241264914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the haemodynamic effects of different ankle movements combined ankle and toe movements on the femoral vein of the lower extremity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>28 healthy volunteers participated in the study. Doppler ultrasound was used to measure peak systolic velocity and time-averaged mean velocity of the common femoral vein during ankle dorsiflexion, ankle dorsiflexion with simultaneous toe extension, ankle plantarflexion, and ankle plantarflexion with simultaneous toe flexion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison to the resting state, both ankle alone or ankle combined with toe movement showed statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> < .01). However, there were no significant difference in the velocity of the common femoral vein between ankle alone and ankle combined with toe movement (<i>p</i> > .05). It is noteworthy that dorsiflexion of the ankle resulted in the highest peak velocity of blood flow.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The impact of ankle movement, with or without toe movement, the velocity of the common femoral vein is not significantly correlated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phlebology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"676-682\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phlebology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555241264914\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555241264914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的方法:28 名健康志愿者参加了研究。使用多普勒超声波测量股总静脉在踝关节背屈、踝关节背屈同时脚趾伸直、踝关节跖屈、踝关节跖屈同时脚趾屈曲时的收缩速度峰值和时间平均速度:与静止状态相比,踝关节单独运动或踝关节与脚趾同时运动的差异均有统计学意义(P < .01)。然而,单纯踝关节运动和踝关节结合脚趾运动的股总静脉速度差异不明显(P > .05)。值得注意的是,踝关节背屈导致血流速度峰值最高:结论:无论脚趾是否运动,踝关节运动对股总静脉血流速度的影响均无明显相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of ankle movements on venous return flow: A comparative study.

Objective: To compare the haemodynamic effects of different ankle movements combined ankle and toe movements on the femoral vein of the lower extremity.

Methods: 28 healthy volunteers participated in the study. Doppler ultrasound was used to measure peak systolic velocity and time-averaged mean velocity of the common femoral vein during ankle dorsiflexion, ankle dorsiflexion with simultaneous toe extension, ankle plantarflexion, and ankle plantarflexion with simultaneous toe flexion.

Results: In comparison to the resting state, both ankle alone or ankle combined with toe movement showed statistically significant differences (p < .01). However, there were no significant difference in the velocity of the common femoral vein between ankle alone and ankle combined with toe movement (p > .05). It is noteworthy that dorsiflexion of the ankle resulted in the highest peak velocity of blood flow.

Conclusion: The impact of ankle movement, with or without toe movement, the velocity of the common femoral vein is not significantly correlated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信