整合临床数据、放射组学和深度学习特征,用于非对比 CT 的端到端延迟性脑缺血预测。

Qi-Qi Ban, Hao-Tian Zhang, Wei Wang, Yi-Fan Du, Yi Zhao, Ai-Jun Peng, Hang Qu
{"title":"整合临床数据、放射组学和深度学习特征,用于非对比 CT 的端到端延迟性脑缺血预测。","authors":"Qi-Qi Ban, Hao-Tian Zhang, Wei Wang, Yi-Fan Du, Yi Zhao, Ai-Jun Peng, Hang Qu","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Delayed cerebral ischemia is hard to diagnose early due to gradual, symptomless development. This study aimed to develop an automated model for predicting delayed cerebral ischemia following aneurysmal SAH on NCCT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 400 patients with aneurysmal SAH (156 with delayed cerebral ischemia) who underwent NCCT. The study used ATT-Deeplabv3+ for automatically segmenting hemorrhagic regions using semisupervised learning. Principal component analysis was used for reducing the dimensionality of deep learning features extracted from the average pooling layer of ATT-DeepLabv3+. The classification model integrated clinical data, radiomics, and deep learning features to predict delayed cerebral ischemia. Feature selection involved Pearson correlation coefficients, least absolute shrinkage, and selection operator regression. We developed models based on clinical features, clinical-radiomics, and a combination of clinical, radiomics, and deep learning. The study selected logistic regression, Naive Bayes, Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), and multilayer perceptron as classifiers. The performance of segmentation and classification models was evaluated on their testing sets using the Dice similarity coefficient for segmentation, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration curves for classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The segmentation process achieved a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.91 and the average time of 0.037 s/image. Seventeen features were selected to calculate the radiomics score. The clinical-radiomics-deep learning model with multilayer perceptron achieved the highest AUC of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.72-0.97), which outperformed the clinical-radiomics model (<i>P </i>= .002) and the clinical features model (<i>P </i>= .001) with multilayer perceptron. The performance of clinical-radiomics-deep learning model using AdaBoost was significantly superior to its clinical-radiomics model (<i>P </i>= .027). The performance of the clinical-radiomics-deep learning model and the clinical-radiomics model with logistic regression notably exceeded that of the model based solely on clinical features (<i>P </i>= .028; <i>P </i>= .046). The AUC of the clinical-radiomics-deep learning model with multilayer perceptron (<i>P </i>< .001) and the clinical-radiomics model with logistic regression (<i>P </i>= .046) were significantly higher than the clinical model with logistic regression. Of all models, the clinical-radiomics-deep learning model with multilayer perceptron showed best calibration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed 2-stage end-to-end model not only achieves rapid and accurate segmentation but also demonstrates superior diagnostic performance with high AUC values and good calibration in the clinical-radiomics-deep learning model, suggesting its potential to enhance delayed cerebral ischemia detection and treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating Clinical Data and Radiomics and Deep Learning Features for End-to-End Delayed Cerebral Ischemia Prediction on Noncontrast CT.\",\"authors\":\"Qi-Qi Ban, Hao-Tian Zhang, Wei Wang, Yi-Fan Du, Yi Zhao, Ai-Jun Peng, Hang Qu\",\"doi\":\"10.3174/ajnr.A8301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Delayed cerebral ischemia is hard to diagnose early due to gradual, symptomless development. This study aimed to develop an automated model for predicting delayed cerebral ischemia following aneurysmal SAH on NCCT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 400 patients with aneurysmal SAH (156 with delayed cerebral ischemia) who underwent NCCT. The study used ATT-Deeplabv3+ for automatically segmenting hemorrhagic regions using semisupervised learning. Principal component analysis was used for reducing the dimensionality of deep learning features extracted from the average pooling layer of ATT-DeepLabv3+. The classification model integrated clinical data, radiomics, and deep learning features to predict delayed cerebral ischemia. Feature selection involved Pearson correlation coefficients, least absolute shrinkage, and selection operator regression. We developed models based on clinical features, clinical-radiomics, and a combination of clinical, radiomics, and deep learning. The study selected logistic regression, Naive Bayes, Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), and multilayer perceptron as classifiers. The performance of segmentation and classification models was evaluated on their testing sets using the Dice similarity coefficient for segmentation, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration curves for classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The segmentation process achieved a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.91 and the average time of 0.037 s/image. Seventeen features were selected to calculate the radiomics score. The clinical-radiomics-deep learning model with multilayer perceptron achieved the highest AUC of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.72-0.97), which outperformed the clinical-radiomics model (<i>P </i>= .002) and the clinical features model (<i>P </i>= .001) with multilayer perceptron. The performance of clinical-radiomics-deep learning model using AdaBoost was significantly superior to its clinical-radiomics model (<i>P </i>= .027). The performance of the clinical-radiomics-deep learning model and the clinical-radiomics model with logistic regression notably exceeded that of the model based solely on clinical features (<i>P </i>= .028; <i>P </i>= .046). The AUC of the clinical-radiomics-deep learning model with multilayer perceptron (<i>P </i>< .001) and the clinical-radiomics model with logistic regression (<i>P </i>= .046) were significantly higher than the clinical model with logistic regression. Of all models, the clinical-radiomics-deep learning model with multilayer perceptron showed best calibration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed 2-stage end-to-end model not only achieves rapid and accurate segmentation but also demonstrates superior diagnostic performance with high AUC values and good calibration in the clinical-radiomics-deep learning model, suggesting its potential to enhance delayed cerebral ischemia detection and treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392366/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:延迟性脑缺血因其逐渐发展、无症状而难以早期诊断。本研究旨在开发一种自动模型,用于通过 NCCT 预测动脉瘤性 SAH 后的延迟性脑缺血:这项回顾性研究纳入了 400 例接受 NCCT 检查的动脉瘤性 SAH 患者(其中 156 例伴有延迟性脑缺血)。该研究使用 ATT-Deeplabv3+ 进行半监督学习,自动分割出血区域。主成分分析用于降低从 ATT-DeepLabv3+ 的平均池化层提取的深度学习特征的维度。分类模型整合了临床数据、放射组学和深度学习特征,以预测延迟性脑缺血。特征选择包括皮尔逊相关系数、最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归。我们开发了基于临床特征、临床-放射组学以及临床、放射组学和深度学习相结合的模型。研究选择了逻辑回归、Naive Bayes、自适应提升(AdaBoost)和多层感知器作为分类器。在测试集上使用 Dice 相似性系数评估了分割和分类模型的性能,并使用接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和校准曲线评估了分类性能:分割过程的狄斯相似系数为 0.91,平均时间为 0.037 秒/图像。选择了 17 个特征来计算放射组学得分。采用多层感知器的临床放射组学深度学习模型的AUC最高,达到0.84(95% CI,0.72-0.97),优于采用多层感知器的临床放射组学模型(P = .002)和临床特征模型(P = .001)。使用 AdaBoost 的临床放射组学深度学习模型的性能明显优于其临床放射组学模型(P = .027)。临床放射组学深度学习模型和采用逻辑回归的临床放射组学模型的性能明显优于仅基于临床特征的模型(P = .028; P = .046)。采用多层感知器的临床放射组学深度学习模型的AUC(P = .046)明显高于采用逻辑回归的临床模型。在所有模型中,采用多层感知器的临床放射深度学习模型的校准效果最好:结论:所提出的两阶段端到端模型不仅能实现快速、准确的分割,而且在临床放射组学深度学习模型中表现出较高的 AUC 值和良好的校准性,显示出其在提高延迟性脑缺血检测和治疗策略方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating Clinical Data and Radiomics and Deep Learning Features for End-to-End Delayed Cerebral Ischemia Prediction on Noncontrast CT.

Background and purpose: Delayed cerebral ischemia is hard to diagnose early due to gradual, symptomless development. This study aimed to develop an automated model for predicting delayed cerebral ischemia following aneurysmal SAH on NCCT.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 400 patients with aneurysmal SAH (156 with delayed cerebral ischemia) who underwent NCCT. The study used ATT-Deeplabv3+ for automatically segmenting hemorrhagic regions using semisupervised learning. Principal component analysis was used for reducing the dimensionality of deep learning features extracted from the average pooling layer of ATT-DeepLabv3+. The classification model integrated clinical data, radiomics, and deep learning features to predict delayed cerebral ischemia. Feature selection involved Pearson correlation coefficients, least absolute shrinkage, and selection operator regression. We developed models based on clinical features, clinical-radiomics, and a combination of clinical, radiomics, and deep learning. The study selected logistic regression, Naive Bayes, Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), and multilayer perceptron as classifiers. The performance of segmentation and classification models was evaluated on their testing sets using the Dice similarity coefficient for segmentation, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration curves for classification.

Results: The segmentation process achieved a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.91 and the average time of 0.037 s/image. Seventeen features were selected to calculate the radiomics score. The clinical-radiomics-deep learning model with multilayer perceptron achieved the highest AUC of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.72-0.97), which outperformed the clinical-radiomics model (P = .002) and the clinical features model (P = .001) with multilayer perceptron. The performance of clinical-radiomics-deep learning model using AdaBoost was significantly superior to its clinical-radiomics model (P = .027). The performance of the clinical-radiomics-deep learning model and the clinical-radiomics model with logistic regression notably exceeded that of the model based solely on clinical features (P = .028; P = .046). The AUC of the clinical-radiomics-deep learning model with multilayer perceptron (P < .001) and the clinical-radiomics model with logistic regression (P = .046) were significantly higher than the clinical model with logistic regression. Of all models, the clinical-radiomics-deep learning model with multilayer perceptron showed best calibration.

Conclusions: The proposed 2-stage end-to-end model not only achieves rapid and accurate segmentation but also demonstrates superior diagnostic performance with high AUC values and good calibration in the clinical-radiomics-deep learning model, suggesting its potential to enhance delayed cerebral ischemia detection and treatment strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信