芬兰电痉挛麻醉实践差异调查。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Saara H Huoponen, Katrin Sisa, Markku Taittonen, Tom Saari, Ulla Ahlmén-Laiho
{"title":"芬兰电痉挛麻醉实践差异调查。","authors":"Saara H Huoponen, Katrin Sisa, Markku Taittonen, Tom Saari, Ulla Ahlmén-Laiho","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examines the extent of variation in anesthesia practices among Finnish neuromodulation units providing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and investigates recent changes within individual units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic survey was carried out among Finnish neuromodulation units exploring staff demographics, anesthesia practices (including agents and adjuvants), patient physiology monitoring, observed adverse effects, patient follow-up times, and recent anesthesia protocol changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finland has 26 neuromodulation units providing ECT, of which 18 (69%) responded to our study. The research uncovered significant differences in anesthesia practices, including induction agent choice, convulsion motor component monitoring, staff educational backgrounds, and reported adverse effects. Propofol was the most commonly used anesthetic in 14 units (78%). Three units (17%) reported using methohexital in 80%-100% of their patients, whereas in contrast, methohexital was not used at all in 10 units (56%). Electromyography seizure activity was quantitatively measured in 6 units (33%), whereas 10 units (56%) did not measure electromyography seizure activity at all. The remaining 2 units assessed seizure activity through visual observation. Headache requiring medication was the most commonly reported adverse effect, and it was reported as a frequent problem in 3 units (18%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the variation in anesthesia practices identified in the study, we suggest there may be benefits to developing a national guideline for standardizing treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ect","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Survey of ECT Anesthesia Practice Variation in Finland.\",\"authors\":\"Saara H Huoponen, Katrin Sisa, Markku Taittonen, Tom Saari, Ulla Ahlmén-Laiho\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examines the extent of variation in anesthesia practices among Finnish neuromodulation units providing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and investigates recent changes within individual units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic survey was carried out among Finnish neuromodulation units exploring staff demographics, anesthesia practices (including agents and adjuvants), patient physiology monitoring, observed adverse effects, patient follow-up times, and recent anesthesia protocol changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finland has 26 neuromodulation units providing ECT, of which 18 (69%) responded to our study. The research uncovered significant differences in anesthesia practices, including induction agent choice, convulsion motor component monitoring, staff educational backgrounds, and reported adverse effects. Propofol was the most commonly used anesthetic in 14 units (78%). Three units (17%) reported using methohexital in 80%-100% of their patients, whereas in contrast, methohexital was not used at all in 10 units (56%). Electromyography seizure activity was quantitatively measured in 6 units (33%), whereas 10 units (56%) did not measure electromyography seizure activity at all. The remaining 2 units assessed seizure activity through visual observation. Headache requiring medication was the most commonly reported adverse effect, and it was reported as a frequent problem in 3 units (18%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the variation in anesthesia practices identified in the study, we suggest there may be benefits to developing a national guideline for standardizing treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ect\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001042\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ect","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨了芬兰提供电休克疗法(ECT)的神经调控单位在麻醉方法上的差异程度,并调查了个别单位最近的变化:本研究探讨了提供电休克疗法(ECT)的芬兰神经调控单位在麻醉方法上的差异程度,并调查了各个单位最近的变化:在芬兰神经调节单位中开展了一项电子调查,调查内容包括员工人口统计学、麻醉方法(包括药剂和辅助剂)、患者生理监测、观察到的不良反应、患者随访时间以及最近的麻醉方案变更:芬兰有 26 家提供电痉挛治疗的神经调控单位,其中 18 家(69%)对我们的研究做出了回应。研究发现了麻醉实践中的显著差异,包括诱导剂的选择、抽搐运动成分监测、工作人员的教育背景以及报告的不良反应。在 14 个单位(78%)中,丙泊酚是最常用的麻醉剂。有 3 个单位(17%)报告其 80%-100% 的患者使用了甲氧苄啶,而 10 个单位(56%)则完全没有使用甲氧苄啶。6 个单位(33%)对肌电图癫痫发作活动进行了定量测量,而 10 个单位(56%)则完全没有测量肌电图癫痫发作活动。其余 2 个单位通过肉眼观察评估癫痫发作活动。需要用药的头痛是最常报告的不良反应,有 3 个单位(18%)经常报告头痛问题:根据研究中发现的麻醉实践差异,我们认为制定一份全国性指南来规范治疗可能会有所裨益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Survey of ECT Anesthesia Practice Variation in Finland.

Objective: This study examines the extent of variation in anesthesia practices among Finnish neuromodulation units providing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and investigates recent changes within individual units.

Methods: An electronic survey was carried out among Finnish neuromodulation units exploring staff demographics, anesthesia practices (including agents and adjuvants), patient physiology monitoring, observed adverse effects, patient follow-up times, and recent anesthesia protocol changes.

Results: Finland has 26 neuromodulation units providing ECT, of which 18 (69%) responded to our study. The research uncovered significant differences in anesthesia practices, including induction agent choice, convulsion motor component monitoring, staff educational backgrounds, and reported adverse effects. Propofol was the most commonly used anesthetic in 14 units (78%). Three units (17%) reported using methohexital in 80%-100% of their patients, whereas in contrast, methohexital was not used at all in 10 units (56%). Electromyography seizure activity was quantitatively measured in 6 units (33%), whereas 10 units (56%) did not measure electromyography seizure activity at all. The remaining 2 units assessed seizure activity through visual observation. Headache requiring medication was the most commonly reported adverse effect, and it was reported as a frequent problem in 3 units (18%).

Conclusions: Based on the variation in anesthesia practices identified in the study, we suggest there may be benefits to developing a national guideline for standardizing treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ect
Journal of Ect 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of ECT covers all aspects of contemporary electroconvulsive therapy, reporting on major clinical and research developments worldwide. Leading clinicians and researchers examine the effects of induced seizures on behavior and on organ systems; review important research results on the mode of induction, occurrence, and propagation of seizures; and explore the difficult sociological, ethical, and legal issues concerning the use of ECT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信