{"title":"卵巢储备功能检测评估的最新进展。","authors":"Nasreen A Osman, Amel E Morgham","doi":"10.1097/OGX.0000000000001284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Women are increasingly postponing pregnancy to achieve specific goals, and as it is known, the ovarian reserve (OR) declines with age, especially after the 30s. Assessing the OR helps in managing the care of women seeking pregnancy. Several OR tests (ORTs) have been advocated for assessing OR.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aims to discuss the different ORTs and the consequences of their use.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>For each topic, a PubMed search was conducted using MeSH terms. The following terms were used: ovarian reserve, ovarian reserve tests, anti-Müllerian hormone, antral follicle count, and diminished ovarian reserve. The search for further references was complemented by manual search, review, synthesis, and summarization of retrieved articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this review, we clarified the concept of OR and the different ORTs and provided a guide for the ultrasound to assess OR. In addition, the clinical value of ORTs was highlighted to explain the implications of the results of these tests and how they can aid in patient counseling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>A number of ORTs are available to the clinician. Anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count are the most valuable, but as with all ORTs, they are best used as screening, not diagnostic tests for OR. Screening for OR is most helpful when applied to specific groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":19409,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","volume":"79 7","pages":"429-435"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Update on Assessment of Ovarian Reserve Testing.\",\"authors\":\"Nasreen A Osman, Amel E Morgham\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OGX.0000000000001284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Women are increasingly postponing pregnancy to achieve specific goals, and as it is known, the ovarian reserve (OR) declines with age, especially after the 30s. Assessing the OR helps in managing the care of women seeking pregnancy. Several OR tests (ORTs) have been advocated for assessing OR.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aims to discuss the different ORTs and the consequences of their use.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>For each topic, a PubMed search was conducted using MeSH terms. The following terms were used: ovarian reserve, ovarian reserve tests, anti-Müllerian hormone, antral follicle count, and diminished ovarian reserve. The search for further references was complemented by manual search, review, synthesis, and summarization of retrieved articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this review, we clarified the concept of OR and the different ORTs and provided a guide for the ultrasound to assess OR. In addition, the clinical value of ORTs was highlighted to explain the implications of the results of these tests and how they can aid in patient counseling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>A number of ORTs are available to the clinician. Anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count are the most valuable, but as with all ORTs, they are best used as screening, not diagnostic tests for OR. Screening for OR is most helpful when applied to specific groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey\",\"volume\":\"79 7\",\"pages\":\"429-435\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000001284\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000001284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Importance: Women are increasingly postponing pregnancy to achieve specific goals, and as it is known, the ovarian reserve (OR) declines with age, especially after the 30s. Assessing the OR helps in managing the care of women seeking pregnancy. Several OR tests (ORTs) have been advocated for assessing OR.
Objectives: This review aims to discuss the different ORTs and the consequences of their use.
Evidence acquisition: For each topic, a PubMed search was conducted using MeSH terms. The following terms were used: ovarian reserve, ovarian reserve tests, anti-Müllerian hormone, antral follicle count, and diminished ovarian reserve. The search for further references was complemented by manual search, review, synthesis, and summarization of retrieved articles.
Results: In this review, we clarified the concept of OR and the different ORTs and provided a guide for the ultrasound to assess OR. In addition, the clinical value of ORTs was highlighted to explain the implications of the results of these tests and how they can aid in patient counseling.
Conclusion and relevance: A number of ORTs are available to the clinician. Anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count are the most valuable, but as with all ORTs, they are best used as screening, not diagnostic tests for OR. Screening for OR is most helpful when applied to specific groups.
期刊介绍：
Each monthly issue of Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey presents summaries of the most timely and clinically relevant research being published worldwide. These concise, easy-to-read summaries provide expert insight into how to apply the latest research to patient care. The accompanying editorial commentary puts the studies into perspective and supplies authoritative guidance. The result is a valuable, time-saving resource for busy clinicians.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
