使用鞘内抗生素和结膜下类固醇进行无滴眼液白内障手术预防的成本分析。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Scott Massa, David J Smits, Alexander T Nguyen, Sachi A Patil, Evan M Chen, Neal H Shorstein, Scott Friedman, Ravi Parikh
{"title":"使用鞘内抗生素和结膜下类固醇进行无滴眼液白内障手术预防的成本分析。","authors":"Scott Massa, David J Smits, Alexander T Nguyen, Sachi A Patil, Evan M Chen, Neal H Shorstein, Scott Friedman, Ravi Parikh","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether dropless, injection-based cataract surgery prophylaxis with intracameral antibiotic and subconjunctival steroid may reduce healthcare system costs and patient out-of-pocket costs compared to topical medication regimens.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>United States national medical expenditures database.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cost analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Costs were analyzed for topical ophthalmics from the 2020 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and for dropless medications from pharmaceutical invoices/catalogs. Main outcomes included system costs, from insurance and patient payments, and out-of-pocket costs for cataract surgery topical and dropless, injection-based prophylactic medication regimens, per eye and nationally. System costs for individual topical medications and same-class dropless, injection-based medications were compared using two-sided, one-sample t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 583 prophylactic topical ophthalmic purchases in MEPS. Mean system costs per eye were $76.20 ± SD 39.07 for the lowest cost topical steroid (prednisolone) compared to $4.01 for the lowest cost subconjunctival steroid (triamcinolone acetonide) (p < 0.001). Per eye, the lowest cost dropless, injection-based regimen, at $15.91, results in an $87.99 (84.7%) reduction in overall healthcare costs and a $43.64 (100%) reduction in patient out-of-pocket costs relative to the lowest cost topical regimen ($103.90 ± 43.14 mean system cost and $43.64 ± 37.32 mean out-of-pocket cost per eye). Use of intracameral moxifloxacin and subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide can reduce annual national healthcare system and out-of-pocket costs up to $450,000,000 and $225,000,000, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An evidence-based cataract surgery prophylactic medication regimen of intracameral moxifloxacin and subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide can reduce healthcare system and patient out-of-pocket costs in comparison to various topical regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost Analysis of Dropless Cataract Surgery Prophylaxis with Intracameral Antibiotics and Subconjunctival Steroids.\",\"authors\":\"Scott Massa, David J Smits, Alexander T Nguyen, Sachi A Patil, Evan M Chen, Neal H Shorstein, Scott Friedman, Ravi Parikh\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether dropless, injection-based cataract surgery prophylaxis with intracameral antibiotic and subconjunctival steroid may reduce healthcare system costs and patient out-of-pocket costs compared to topical medication regimens.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>United States national medical expenditures database.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cost analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Costs were analyzed for topical ophthalmics from the 2020 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and for dropless medications from pharmaceutical invoices/catalogs. Main outcomes included system costs, from insurance and patient payments, and out-of-pocket costs for cataract surgery topical and dropless, injection-based prophylactic medication regimens, per eye and nationally. System costs for individual topical medications and same-class dropless, injection-based medications were compared using two-sided, one-sample t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 583 prophylactic topical ophthalmic purchases in MEPS. Mean system costs per eye were $76.20 ± SD 39.07 for the lowest cost topical steroid (prednisolone) compared to $4.01 for the lowest cost subconjunctival steroid (triamcinolone acetonide) (p < 0.001). Per eye, the lowest cost dropless, injection-based regimen, at $15.91, results in an $87.99 (84.7%) reduction in overall healthcare costs and a $43.64 (100%) reduction in patient out-of-pocket costs relative to the lowest cost topical regimen ($103.90 ± 43.14 mean system cost and $43.64 ± 37.32 mean out-of-pocket cost per eye). Use of intracameral moxifloxacin and subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide can reduce annual national healthcare system and out-of-pocket costs up to $450,000,000 and $225,000,000, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An evidence-based cataract surgery prophylactic medication regimen of intracameral moxifloxacin and subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide can reduce healthcare system and patient out-of-pocket costs in comparison to various topical regimens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556800/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001526\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001526","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与局部用药方案相比,确定使用巩膜内抗生素和结膜下类固醇进行白内障手术预防的无滴眼剂注射方案是否能降低医疗系统成本和患者自付费用:背景:美国国家医疗支出数据库:设计:回顾性成本分析:分析了2020年医疗支出小组调查(MEPS)中眼科局部用药的成本和药品发票/目录中无滴用药的成本。主要结果包括保险和患者支付的系统成本,以及白内障手术局部用药和无滴眼液、注射预防性用药的自付成本,以每只眼睛和全国为单位。使用双侧单样本 t 检验比较了单个局部用药和同类无滴式注射药物的系统成本:结果:MEPS 共购买了 583 种预防性眼科局部用药。成本最低的局部类固醇(泼尼松龙)每只眼的平均系统成本为 76.20 美元(± SD 39.07),而成本最低的结膜下类固醇(曲安奈德)每只眼的平均系统成本为 4.01 美元(P < 0.001)。与成本最低的局部用药方案相比,成本最低的无滴眼液注射方案(每只眼 15.91 美元)可使总体医疗成本降低 87.99 美元(84.7%),患者自付成本降低 43.64 美元(100%)(每只眼平均系统成本为 103.90 ± 43.14 美元,平均自付成本为 43.64 ± 37.32 美元)。使用巩膜内莫西沙星和结膜下曲安奈德可使全国医疗系统和自付费用每年分别减少高达4.5亿美元和2.25亿美元:巩膜内莫西沙星和结膜下曲安奈德可减少医疗系统和患者的自付费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost Analysis of Dropless Cataract Surgery Prophylaxis with Intracameral Antibiotics and Subconjunctival Steroids.

Purpose: To determine whether dropless, injection-based cataract surgery prophylaxis with intracameral antibiotic and subconjunctival steroid may reduce healthcare system costs and patient out-of-pocket costs compared to topical medication regimens.

Setting: United States national medical expenditures database.

Design: Retrospective cost analysis.

Methods: Costs were analyzed for topical ophthalmics from the 2020 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and for dropless medications from pharmaceutical invoices/catalogs. Main outcomes included system costs, from insurance and patient payments, and out-of-pocket costs for cataract surgery topical and dropless, injection-based prophylactic medication regimens, per eye and nationally. System costs for individual topical medications and same-class dropless, injection-based medications were compared using two-sided, one-sample t-tests.

Results: There were 583 prophylactic topical ophthalmic purchases in MEPS. Mean system costs per eye were $76.20 ± SD 39.07 for the lowest cost topical steroid (prednisolone) compared to $4.01 for the lowest cost subconjunctival steroid (triamcinolone acetonide) (p < 0.001). Per eye, the lowest cost dropless, injection-based regimen, at $15.91, results in an $87.99 (84.7%) reduction in overall healthcare costs and a $43.64 (100%) reduction in patient out-of-pocket costs relative to the lowest cost topical regimen ($103.90 ± 43.14 mean system cost and $43.64 ± 37.32 mean out-of-pocket cost per eye). Use of intracameral moxifloxacin and subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide can reduce annual national healthcare system and out-of-pocket costs up to $450,000,000 and $225,000,000, respectively.

Conclusions: An evidence-based cataract surgery prophylactic medication regimen of intracameral moxifloxacin and subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide can reduce healthcare system and patient out-of-pocket costs in comparison to various topical regimens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信