Hebe M Guardiola-Diaz, Brett T DiBenedictis, Erealda Prendaj, Rashmi Bansal
{"title":"少突胶质细胞对不同 FGF 家族成员的不同反应:解耦 FGF 亚家族内的结构-功能关系。","authors":"Hebe M Guardiola-Diaz, Brett T DiBenedictis, Erealda Prendaj, Rashmi Bansal","doi":"10.1080/17590914.2024.2371163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The fifteen canonical paracrine fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are organized in five subfamilies that interact with four FGF-receptors (FGFRs) and heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) co-receptors. Many of these FGFs are expressed in CNS regions where oligodendrocyte (OL) progenitors originate, migrate or differentiate. FGF2 (basic FGF) is considered a prototype FGF and the information about the effects of FGF signaling on OL-lineage cells has evolved largely from the study of FGF2. However, other FGFs from four subfamilies ((FGF1 (FGF1,-2), FGF4 (FGF4,-5,-6), FGF8 (FGF8,-17,-18) and FGF9 (FGF9,-16,-20)) that can interact with the isoforms of FGFRs expressed in OL-lineage cells may also play important roles. We previously reported OL-responses to FGF8 family members. Here, we investigate the effects of members of the FGF1,-4, and -9 subfamilies on proliferation and differentiation of OL progenitors (OPCs), and on cell cycle re-entry and down-regulation of myelin proteins by mature OLs. We found that while FGF2 induced all these responses strongly, FGF4,-6,-9 could do so only transiently and in the presence of exogenous HSPGs, and that FGF5,-16,-20 could not do so even in the presence of heparin or at higher concentrations. Furthermore, we noted that structurally similar FGFs within subfamilies did not always show similarities in their biological effects on OL-lineage cells. Taken together, these studies reveal that FGFs differ in the way they regulate the OL-lineage cells, emphasizes the selectivity and importance of HSPGs as FGF co-receptors in OL-lineage cells and suggests that structural similarity among FGF-subfamily members may not always predict their overlapping biological functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8616,"journal":{"name":"ASN NEURO","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diverse Responses of Oligodendrocytes to Different FGF-Family Members: Uncoupling Structure-Function Relationship Within FGF Subfamilies.\",\"authors\":\"Hebe M Guardiola-Diaz, Brett T DiBenedictis, Erealda Prendaj, Rashmi Bansal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17590914.2024.2371163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The fifteen canonical paracrine fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are organized in five subfamilies that interact with four FGF-receptors (FGFRs) and heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) co-receptors. Many of these FGFs are expressed in CNS regions where oligodendrocyte (OL) progenitors originate, migrate or differentiate. FGF2 (basic FGF) is considered a prototype FGF and the information about the effects of FGF signaling on OL-lineage cells has evolved largely from the study of FGF2. However, other FGFs from four subfamilies ((FGF1 (FGF1,-2), FGF4 (FGF4,-5,-6), FGF8 (FGF8,-17,-18) and FGF9 (FGF9,-16,-20)) that can interact with the isoforms of FGFRs expressed in OL-lineage cells may also play important roles. We previously reported OL-responses to FGF8 family members. Here, we investigate the effects of members of the FGF1,-4, and -9 subfamilies on proliferation and differentiation of OL progenitors (OPCs), and on cell cycle re-entry and down-regulation of myelin proteins by mature OLs. We found that while FGF2 induced all these responses strongly, FGF4,-6,-9 could do so only transiently and in the presence of exogenous HSPGs, and that FGF5,-16,-20 could not do so even in the presence of heparin or at higher concentrations. Furthermore, we noted that structurally similar FGFs within subfamilies did not always show similarities in their biological effects on OL-lineage cells. Taken together, these studies reveal that FGFs differ in the way they regulate the OL-lineage cells, emphasizes the selectivity and importance of HSPGs as FGF co-receptors in OL-lineage cells and suggests that structural similarity among FGF-subfamily members may not always predict their overlapping biological functions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASN NEURO\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262039/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASN NEURO\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17590914.2024.2371163\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASN NEURO","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17590914.2024.2371163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
15 种典型的旁分泌型成纤维细胞生长因子(FGFs)分为 5 个亚族,它们与 4 种 FGF 受体(FGFRs)和硫酸肝素蛋白聚糖(HSPG)共受体相互作用。其中许多生长因子在中枢神经系统区域表达,少突胶质细胞(OL)祖细胞在这些区域起源、迁移或分化。FGF2(基本 FGF)被认为是 FGF 的原型,有关 FGF 信号对 OL 系细胞影响的信息主要来自对 FGF2 的研究。然而,来自四个亚家族(FGF1 (FGF1,-2)、FGF4 (FGF4,-5,-6)、FGF8 (FGF8,-17,-18) 和 FGF9 (FGF9,-16,-20))、能与 OL 系细胞中表达的 FGFR 异构体相互作用的其他 FGF 也可能发挥重要作用。我们以前曾报道过 OL 对 FGF8 家族成员的反应。在这里,我们研究了 FGF1、-4 和 -9 亚家族成员对 OL 祖细胞(OPCs)增殖和分化的影响,以及对成熟 OLs 重新进入细胞周期和下调髓鞘蛋白的影响。我们发现,虽然 FGF2 能强烈诱导所有这些反应,但 FGF4、-6、-9 只能在外源性 HSPG 存在的情况下短暂诱导这些反应,而 FGF5、-16、-20 即使在肝素存在或浓度较高的情况下也不能诱导这些反应。此外,我们还注意到,亚家族中结构相似的 FGFs 对 OL 系细胞的生物效应并不总是相似的。总之,这些研究揭示了 FGFs 在调控 OL 系细胞的方式上存在差异,强调了 HSPGs 作为 FGF 共受体在 OL 系细胞中的选择性和重要性,并表明 FGF 亚家族成员之间的结构相似性并不总能预示它们的生物功能重叠。
Diverse Responses of Oligodendrocytes to Different FGF-Family Members: Uncoupling Structure-Function Relationship Within FGF Subfamilies.
The fifteen canonical paracrine fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are organized in five subfamilies that interact with four FGF-receptors (FGFRs) and heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) co-receptors. Many of these FGFs are expressed in CNS regions where oligodendrocyte (OL) progenitors originate, migrate or differentiate. FGF2 (basic FGF) is considered a prototype FGF and the information about the effects of FGF signaling on OL-lineage cells has evolved largely from the study of FGF2. However, other FGFs from four subfamilies ((FGF1 (FGF1,-2), FGF4 (FGF4,-5,-6), FGF8 (FGF8,-17,-18) and FGF9 (FGF9,-16,-20)) that can interact with the isoforms of FGFRs expressed in OL-lineage cells may also play important roles. We previously reported OL-responses to FGF8 family members. Here, we investigate the effects of members of the FGF1,-4, and -9 subfamilies on proliferation and differentiation of OL progenitors (OPCs), and on cell cycle re-entry and down-regulation of myelin proteins by mature OLs. We found that while FGF2 induced all these responses strongly, FGF4,-6,-9 could do so only transiently and in the presence of exogenous HSPGs, and that FGF5,-16,-20 could not do so even in the presence of heparin or at higher concentrations. Furthermore, we noted that structurally similar FGFs within subfamilies did not always show similarities in their biological effects on OL-lineage cells. Taken together, these studies reveal that FGFs differ in the way they regulate the OL-lineage cells, emphasizes the selectivity and importance of HSPGs as FGF co-receptors in OL-lineage cells and suggests that structural similarity among FGF-subfamily members may not always predict their overlapping biological functions.
期刊介绍:
ASN NEURO is an open access, peer-reviewed journal uniquely positioned to provide investigators with the most recent advances across the breadth of the cellular and molecular neurosciences. The official journal of the American Society for Neurochemistry, ASN NEURO is dedicated to the promotion, support, and facilitation of communication among cellular and molecular neuroscientists of all specializations.