电力制甲醇工艺配置的比较评估和工艺灵活性评估

IF 3.2 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Energy advances Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1039/D4YA00433G
Siphesihle Mbatha, Xiaoti Cui, Payam G. Panah, Sébastien Thomas, Ksenia Parkhomenko, Anne-Cécile Roger, Benoit Louis, Ray Everson, Paulo Debiagi, Nicholas Musyoka and Henrietta Langmi
{"title":"电力制甲醇工艺配置的比较评估和工艺灵活性评估","authors":"Siphesihle Mbatha, Xiaoti Cui, Payam G. Panah, Sébastien Thomas, Ksenia Parkhomenko, Anne-Cécile Roger, Benoit Louis, Ray Everson, Paulo Debiagi, Nicholas Musyoka and Henrietta Langmi","doi":"10.1039/D4YA00433G","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This paper compares different power-to-methanol process configurations encompassing the electrolyser, adiabatic reactor(s) and methanol purification configurations. Twelve different power-to-methanol configurations based on direct CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> hydrogenation with H<small><sub>2</sub></small> derived from H<small><sub>2</sub></small>O-electrolysis were modelled, compared, and analysed. A high temperature solid oxide electrolyser is used for hydrogen production. A fixed bed reactor is used for methanol synthesis. The aim of the paper is to give detailed comparison of the process layouts under similar conditions and select the best performing process configuration considering the overall methanol production, carbon conversion, flexibility, and energy efficiency. ASPEN PLUS® V11 is used for flowsheet modelling and the system architectures considered are the open loop systems where methanol is produced at 100 kton per annum and sold to commercial wholesale market as the final purified commodity. Further optimization requirements are established as targets for future work. Three options of power-to-methanol configuration with methanol synthesis from CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> hydrogenation are proposed and further evaluated considering process flexibility. From the evaluation, the series–series based configuration with three adiabatic reactors in series performed better in most parameters including the flexible load dependent energy efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":72913,"journal":{"name":"Energy advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/ya/d4ya00433g?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of the power-to-methanol process configurations and assessment of process flexibility†\",\"authors\":\"Siphesihle Mbatha, Xiaoti Cui, Payam G. Panah, Sébastien Thomas, Ksenia Parkhomenko, Anne-Cécile Roger, Benoit Louis, Ray Everson, Paulo Debiagi, Nicholas Musyoka and Henrietta Langmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4YA00433G\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >This paper compares different power-to-methanol process configurations encompassing the electrolyser, adiabatic reactor(s) and methanol purification configurations. Twelve different power-to-methanol configurations based on direct CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> hydrogenation with H<small><sub>2</sub></small> derived from H<small><sub>2</sub></small>O-electrolysis were modelled, compared, and analysed. A high temperature solid oxide electrolyser is used for hydrogen production. A fixed bed reactor is used for methanol synthesis. The aim of the paper is to give detailed comparison of the process layouts under similar conditions and select the best performing process configuration considering the overall methanol production, carbon conversion, flexibility, and energy efficiency. ASPEN PLUS® V11 is used for flowsheet modelling and the system architectures considered are the open loop systems where methanol is produced at 100 kton per annum and sold to commercial wholesale market as the final purified commodity. Further optimization requirements are established as targets for future work. Three options of power-to-methanol configuration with methanol synthesis from CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> hydrogenation are proposed and further evaluated considering process flexibility. From the evaluation, the series–series based configuration with three adiabatic reactors in series performed better in most parameters including the flexible load dependent energy efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/ya/d4ya00433g?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ya/d4ya00433g\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ya/d4ya00433g","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文比较了不同的电力制甲醇工艺配置,包括电解槽、绝热反应器和甲醇净化配置。模拟、比较和分析了 12 种不同的电力制甲醇配置,这些配置基于直接 CO2 加氢和 H2O 电解产生的 H2。高温固体氧化物电解槽用于制氢。固定床反应器用于合成甲醇。本文旨在对类似条件下的工艺布局进行详细比较,并在考虑整体甲醇产量、碳转化率、灵活性和能效的基础上选择性能最佳的工艺配置。ASPEN PLUS® V11 用于流程建模,考虑的系统结构为开环系统,甲醇产量为 100 kton/年,并作为最终纯化商品销往商业批发市场。进一步的优化要求被确定为未来工作的目标。考虑到工艺的灵活性,我们提出了三种从二氧化碳加氢合成甲醇的电力-甲醇配置方案,并对其进行了进一步评估。从评估结果来看,基于串联的三个绝热反应器的串联配置在大多数参数(包括与灵活负载相关的能效)方面表现更佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative evaluation of the power-to-methanol process configurations and assessment of process flexibility†

Comparative evaluation of the power-to-methanol process configurations and assessment of process flexibility†

This paper compares different power-to-methanol process configurations encompassing the electrolyser, adiabatic reactor(s) and methanol purification configurations. Twelve different power-to-methanol configurations based on direct CO2 hydrogenation with H2 derived from H2O-electrolysis were modelled, compared, and analysed. A high temperature solid oxide electrolyser is used for hydrogen production. A fixed bed reactor is used for methanol synthesis. The aim of the paper is to give detailed comparison of the process layouts under similar conditions and select the best performing process configuration considering the overall methanol production, carbon conversion, flexibility, and energy efficiency. ASPEN PLUS® V11 is used for flowsheet modelling and the system architectures considered are the open loop systems where methanol is produced at 100 kton per annum and sold to commercial wholesale market as the final purified commodity. Further optimization requirements are established as targets for future work. Three options of power-to-methanol configuration with methanol synthesis from CO2 hydrogenation are proposed and further evaluated considering process flexibility. From the evaluation, the series–series based configuration with three adiabatic reactors in series performed better in most parameters including the flexible load dependent energy efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信