{"title":"日本儿童牙医和牙科麻醉师对儿童牙科治疗全身麻醉的认识差异","authors":"Tomoka Matsumura , Shigeru Maeda , Tsutomu Iwamoto , Takehiko Iijima","doi":"10.1016/j.pdj.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div><span><span>In Japan, the use of general anesthesia for </span>dental treatment (GAD) is common in patients with intellectual disabilities. However, GAD in uncooperative </span>pediatric patients without intellectual disabilities is uncommon.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the variance in acceptance of GAD between pediatric dentists and dental anesthesiologists contributed to its limited use in uncooperative children.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A questionnaire-based survey was administered to dentists certified by the Japanese Society of Pediatric Dentistry (JSPD) and the Japanese Society of Dental Anesthesiologists (JDSA). The questionnaire included questions regarding the implementation and understanding of general anesthesia and sedation in children. The responses from both groups were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results showed that 63% of the JDSA group believed that restraints in dental treatment negatively affect intellectual development, compared to only 37% of the JSPD group. Additionally, 84% of the JDSA group preferred GA as it avoids interruption of treatment for uncooperative pediatric patients, compared to only 42% of the JSPD group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dental anesthesiologists and pediatric dentists have different perceptions of GAD, and more communication is needed to establish optimal indications for GAD in pediatric patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19977,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Dental Journal","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 101-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in perception of general anesthesia for pediatric dental treatment between pediatric dentists and dental anesthesiologists in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Tomoka Matsumura , Shigeru Maeda , Tsutomu Iwamoto , Takehiko Iijima\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pdj.2024.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div><span><span>In Japan, the use of general anesthesia for </span>dental treatment (GAD) is common in patients with intellectual disabilities. However, GAD in uncooperative </span>pediatric patients without intellectual disabilities is uncommon.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the variance in acceptance of GAD between pediatric dentists and dental anesthesiologists contributed to its limited use in uncooperative children.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A questionnaire-based survey was administered to dentists certified by the Japanese Society of Pediatric Dentistry (JSPD) and the Japanese Society of Dental Anesthesiologists (JDSA). The questionnaire included questions regarding the implementation and understanding of general anesthesia and sedation in children. The responses from both groups were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results showed that 63% of the JDSA group believed that restraints in dental treatment negatively affect intellectual development, compared to only 37% of the JSPD group. Additionally, 84% of the JDSA group preferred GA as it avoids interruption of treatment for uncooperative pediatric patients, compared to only 42% of the JSPD group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dental anesthesiologists and pediatric dentists have different perceptions of GAD, and more communication is needed to establish optimal indications for GAD in pediatric patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 101-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0917239424000223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0917239424000223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differences in perception of general anesthesia for pediatric dental treatment between pediatric dentists and dental anesthesiologists in Japan
Introduction
In Japan, the use of general anesthesia for dental treatment (GAD) is common in patients with intellectual disabilities. However, GAD in uncooperative pediatric patients without intellectual disabilities is uncommon.
Aim
This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the variance in acceptance of GAD between pediatric dentists and dental anesthesiologists contributed to its limited use in uncooperative children.
Materials and methods
A questionnaire-based survey was administered to dentists certified by the Japanese Society of Pediatric Dentistry (JSPD) and the Japanese Society of Dental Anesthesiologists (JDSA). The questionnaire included questions regarding the implementation and understanding of general anesthesia and sedation in children. The responses from both groups were compared.
Results
The results showed that 63% of the JDSA group believed that restraints in dental treatment negatively affect intellectual development, compared to only 37% of the JSPD group. Additionally, 84% of the JDSA group preferred GA as it avoids interruption of treatment for uncooperative pediatric patients, compared to only 42% of the JSPD group.
Conclusion
Dental anesthesiologists and pediatric dentists have different perceptions of GAD, and more communication is needed to establish optimal indications for GAD in pediatric patients.