A. Mayo , M.W. O'Brien , J. Godin , D.S. Kehler , D.S. Kimmerly , O. Theou
{"title":"积极的生活方式能否抵消不良生活行为对体弱的影响?","authors":"A. Mayo , M.W. O'Brien , J. Godin , D.S. Kehler , D.S. Kimmerly , O. Theou","doi":"10.1016/j.archger.2024.105556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine the association of lifestyle behaviours (LSB) with physical activity (PA) and frailty; also, to examine if associations differ by sex and age.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>24,828 individuals [49.6 ± 17.6 years (range: 20–85), 51.6 % female] from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (cycles 2009–2018) were included. Individuals were divided into Active (≥150 min/week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA)) and Inactive (<150 min/week MVPA) based on self-reported PA. Frailty was measured by a 46-item Frailty Index (FI). LSB consisted of stationary time, sleep, diet quality, and alcohol and smoking habits. LSB was summed into a score [0–5]. Linear regression models were used with each LSB in isolation and the summed LSB with frailty.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 7,495 (30.1 %) Active and 17,333 (69.8 %) Inactive individuals. The FI was lower in the Active participants (Active: 0.10 ± 0.08; Inactive: 0.15 ± 0.12; <em>p</em> < 0.01). A worse LSB score was associated with an increased FI in all behaviours but females who binge drink and smoke (p-all>0.14). For inactive individuals, all LSBs were associated with an increased FI except those who binge drink and male smokers (<em>p</em> = 0.08). There was a significant association between increased summed LSB and an increased FI (β range: Active, 0.024–0.037; Inactive, 0.028, 0.046. p-all<0.01); the Active group had a lower FI at every age group than the Inactive group (<em>p</em> < 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PA was associated with a lower FI even among those with a poor LSB score. This association is dependent on age, with older individuals reporting a stronger association.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8306,"journal":{"name":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 105556"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494324002322/pdfft?md5=490f12e9944b9af6021ba7825f31a618&pid=1-s2.0-S0167494324002322-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can an active lifestyle offset the relationship that poor lifestyle behaviours have on frailty?\",\"authors\":\"A. Mayo , M.W. O'Brien , J. Godin , D.S. Kehler , D.S. Kimmerly , O. Theou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.archger.2024.105556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine the association of lifestyle behaviours (LSB) with physical activity (PA) and frailty; also, to examine if associations differ by sex and age.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>24,828 individuals [49.6 ± 17.6 years (range: 20–85), 51.6 % female] from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (cycles 2009–2018) were included. Individuals were divided into Active (≥150 min/week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA)) and Inactive (<150 min/week MVPA) based on self-reported PA. Frailty was measured by a 46-item Frailty Index (FI). LSB consisted of stationary time, sleep, diet quality, and alcohol and smoking habits. LSB was summed into a score [0–5]. Linear regression models were used with each LSB in isolation and the summed LSB with frailty.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 7,495 (30.1 %) Active and 17,333 (69.8 %) Inactive individuals. The FI was lower in the Active participants (Active: 0.10 ± 0.08; Inactive: 0.15 ± 0.12; <em>p</em> < 0.01). A worse LSB score was associated with an increased FI in all behaviours but females who binge drink and smoke (p-all>0.14). For inactive individuals, all LSBs were associated with an increased FI except those who binge drink and male smokers (<em>p</em> = 0.08). There was a significant association between increased summed LSB and an increased FI (β range: Active, 0.024–0.037; Inactive, 0.028, 0.046. p-all<0.01); the Active group had a lower FI at every age group than the Inactive group (<em>p</em> < 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PA was associated with a lower FI even among those with a poor LSB score. This association is dependent on age, with older individuals reporting a stronger association.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105556\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494324002322/pdfft?md5=490f12e9944b9af6021ba7825f31a618&pid=1-s2.0-S0167494324002322-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494324002322\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494324002322","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can an active lifestyle offset the relationship that poor lifestyle behaviours have on frailty?
Objective
To examine the association of lifestyle behaviours (LSB) with physical activity (PA) and frailty; also, to examine if associations differ by sex and age.
Methods
24,828 individuals [49.6 ± 17.6 years (range: 20–85), 51.6 % female] from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (cycles 2009–2018) were included. Individuals were divided into Active (≥150 min/week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA)) and Inactive (<150 min/week MVPA) based on self-reported PA. Frailty was measured by a 46-item Frailty Index (FI). LSB consisted of stationary time, sleep, diet quality, and alcohol and smoking habits. LSB was summed into a score [0–5]. Linear regression models were used with each LSB in isolation and the summed LSB with frailty.
Results
There were 7,495 (30.1 %) Active and 17,333 (69.8 %) Inactive individuals. The FI was lower in the Active participants (Active: 0.10 ± 0.08; Inactive: 0.15 ± 0.12; p < 0.01). A worse LSB score was associated with an increased FI in all behaviours but females who binge drink and smoke (p-all>0.14). For inactive individuals, all LSBs were associated with an increased FI except those who binge drink and male smokers (p = 0.08). There was a significant association between increased summed LSB and an increased FI (β range: Active, 0.024–0.037; Inactive, 0.028, 0.046. p-all<0.01); the Active group had a lower FI at every age group than the Inactive group (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
PA was associated with a lower FI even among those with a poor LSB score. This association is dependent on age, with older individuals reporting a stronger association.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics provides a medium for the publication of papers from the fields of experimental gerontology and clinical and social geriatrics. The principal aim of the journal is to facilitate the exchange of information between specialists in these three fields of gerontological research. Experimental papers dealing with the basic mechanisms of aging at molecular, cellular, tissue or organ levels will be published.
Clinical papers will be accepted if they provide sufficiently new information or are of fundamental importance for the knowledge of human aging. Purely descriptive clinical papers will be accepted only if the results permit further interpretation. Papers dealing with anti-aging pharmacological preparations in humans are welcome. Papers on the social aspects of geriatrics will be accepted if they are of general interest regarding the epidemiology of aging and the efficiency and working methods of the social organizations for the health care of the elderly.