法医精神病患者的神经心理学评估和认知障碍验证

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
D.A. Pilechev, Y. Mikadze, V. Vandysh-Bubko, T.V. Adamovich
{"title":"法医精神病患者的神经心理学评估和认知障碍验证","authors":"D.A. Pilechev, Y. Mikadze, V. Vandysh-Bubko, T.V. Adamovich","doi":"10.17759/psylaw.2024140210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In modern clinical psychiatry, there is a tendency to introduce the principle of quasi-dimensional assessment, which can be facilitated by the use of specialized diagnostic methods such as neuropsychological examination. The purpose of the study is to clarify the possibilities of neuropsychological examination during forensic psychiatric examination for persons held criminally responsible. As part of the forensic psychiatric examination of persons brought to criminal responsibility on the basis of the Serbsky State Scientific Center for Social and Forensic Psychiatry Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 113 men (age 42±13) were examined with established groups of diagnoses, including organic, personality disorders, as well as schizophrenic spectrum disorders, disorders associated with the use of psychoactive substances. Of these, 50 people were declared “insane” and 63 were “sane”. A neuropsychological examination was performed using qualitative syndrome and quantitative analysis. In individuals with organic mental disorders (OMD), there were more pronounced disorders of neurocognitive functioning compared to those surveyed with other mental disorders. In addition, persons with OMD who were recognized as “insane”, compared with persons recognized as “sane”, had more pronounced disorders in such parameters as: programming, regulation and control, neurodynamic characteristics, auditory—speech memory, with primary interest - frontal (p=0.004), temporal (p=0.004), and subcortical structures (p=0.005). The results of a neuropsychological examination can be used to verify an expert decision at the level of both medical and psychological criteria, primarily in the examination of persons suffering from an organic mental disorder.","PeriodicalId":43238,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Law","volume":"52 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuropsychological Assessment and Verification of Cognitive Impairments in Forensic Psychiatry Patients\",\"authors\":\"D.A. Pilechev, Y. Mikadze, V. Vandysh-Bubko, T.V. Adamovich\",\"doi\":\"10.17759/psylaw.2024140210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In modern clinical psychiatry, there is a tendency to introduce the principle of quasi-dimensional assessment, which can be facilitated by the use of specialized diagnostic methods such as neuropsychological examination. The purpose of the study is to clarify the possibilities of neuropsychological examination during forensic psychiatric examination for persons held criminally responsible. As part of the forensic psychiatric examination of persons brought to criminal responsibility on the basis of the Serbsky State Scientific Center for Social and Forensic Psychiatry Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 113 men (age 42±13) were examined with established groups of diagnoses, including organic, personality disorders, as well as schizophrenic spectrum disorders, disorders associated with the use of psychoactive substances. Of these, 50 people were declared “insane” and 63 were “sane”. A neuropsychological examination was performed using qualitative syndrome and quantitative analysis. In individuals with organic mental disorders (OMD), there were more pronounced disorders of neurocognitive functioning compared to those surveyed with other mental disorders. In addition, persons with OMD who were recognized as “insane”, compared with persons recognized as “sane”, had more pronounced disorders in such parameters as: programming, regulation and control, neurodynamic characteristics, auditory—speech memory, with primary interest - frontal (p=0.004), temporal (p=0.004), and subcortical structures (p=0.005). The results of a neuropsychological examination can be used to verify an expert decision at the level of both medical and psychological criteria, primarily in the examination of persons suffering from an organic mental disorder.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology and Law\",\"volume\":\"52 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在现代临床精神病学中,有一种引入准维度评估原则的趋势,使用神经心理学检查等专业诊断方法可以促进这种评估。本研究的目的是阐明在对刑事责任人进行法医精神病学检查时进行神经心理学检查的可能性。作为俄罗斯联邦卫生部谢尔布斯基州社会和法医精神病学科学中心对被追究刑事责任者进行的法医精神病学检查的一部分,对 113 名男性(年龄为 42±13 岁)进行了检查,他们都有既定的诊断,包括器质性疾病、人格障碍、精神分裂症谱系障碍、与使用精神活性物质有关的障碍。其中 50 人被宣布为 "精神失常",63 人被宣布为 "精神正常"。通过定性综合分析和定量分析进行了神经心理学检查。与被调查的其他精神障碍患者相比,器质性精神障碍(OMD)患者的神经认知功能障碍更为明显。此外,被认定为 "精神失常 "的器质性精神障碍患者与被认定为 "精神正常 "的患者相比,在以下参数方面存在更明显的障碍:程序设计、调节和控制、神经动力特征、听觉-言语记忆,主要关注额叶(p=0.004)、颞叶(p=0.004)和皮层下结构(p=0.005)。神经心理学检查的结果可用于验证医学和心理学标准层面的专家决定,主要用于对器质性精神障碍患者的检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuropsychological Assessment and Verification of Cognitive Impairments in Forensic Psychiatry Patients
In modern clinical psychiatry, there is a tendency to introduce the principle of quasi-dimensional assessment, which can be facilitated by the use of specialized diagnostic methods such as neuropsychological examination. The purpose of the study is to clarify the possibilities of neuropsychological examination during forensic psychiatric examination for persons held criminally responsible. As part of the forensic psychiatric examination of persons brought to criminal responsibility on the basis of the Serbsky State Scientific Center for Social and Forensic Psychiatry Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 113 men (age 42±13) were examined with established groups of diagnoses, including organic, personality disorders, as well as schizophrenic spectrum disorders, disorders associated with the use of psychoactive substances. Of these, 50 people were declared “insane” and 63 were “sane”. A neuropsychological examination was performed using qualitative syndrome and quantitative analysis. In individuals with organic mental disorders (OMD), there were more pronounced disorders of neurocognitive functioning compared to those surveyed with other mental disorders. In addition, persons with OMD who were recognized as “insane”, compared with persons recognized as “sane”, had more pronounced disorders in such parameters as: programming, regulation and control, neurodynamic characteristics, auditory—speech memory, with primary interest - frontal (p=0.004), temporal (p=0.004), and subcortical structures (p=0.005). The results of a neuropsychological examination can be used to verify an expert decision at the level of both medical and psychological criteria, primarily in the examination of persons suffering from an organic mental disorder.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology and Law
Psychology and Law PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
75.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信