{"title":"欧洲压力容器标准中内压准则下锥形部件的比较分析与改进","authors":"Isaak Dassa , Dimitrios Mertzis , Konstantinos Karamitsios","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.105257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of conical components in pressure vessels emphasizing their significance when utilized to transition between different diameters or slopes. A thorough design and analysis are underscored as essential for ensuring the safety and reliability of these components under diverse loading circumstances. The paper aims to propose enhancements to the European Pressure Vessel Standards concerning conical components under internal pressure, with a focus on improving safety, reliability, and compliance with industry standards. Existing European standards are reviewed, identifying potential gaps and proposing practical solutions. The paper also presents research findings on the influence of cone apex angles, shell geometries and design pressure on cone plate thickness calculations. A new methodology for the design and analysis of conical components in pressure vessels is proposed, offering a potential pathway to safer and more efficient pressure vessels. A range of cylinder diameter between 1000 and 2500 mm and cone angles between 30° and 60° are used as input to quantify the difference in cone thickness for a design pressure ranging between 10 and 200 bar<sub>g</sub>. The proposed method yields results much closer to AD2000 compared to EN13445, leading to slightly thicker cones (up to 2.2 mm for the selected range of cone diameters and angles) compared to the former, resulting in safer pressure vessel design, and thinner cones (up to 22 mm) compared to the latter resulting in significant material savings. A comparative analysis was performed through Finite Element Analysis validating the EN13445 unsuitability for cone thickness calculations. A modification is proposed for equation (7.6)-(8) in EN13445 resulting in thinner plates reducing the cone plate thickness difference to 0.9 % on average compared to the current deviation of -9.6 % on average for the selected range of cylinder diameters and cone angles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54946,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 105257"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis and enhancement of conical component calculation under internal pressure in European pressure vessel Standards\",\"authors\":\"Isaak Dassa , Dimitrios Mertzis , Konstantinos Karamitsios\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.105257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of conical components in pressure vessels emphasizing their significance when utilized to transition between different diameters or slopes. A thorough design and analysis are underscored as essential for ensuring the safety and reliability of these components under diverse loading circumstances. The paper aims to propose enhancements to the European Pressure Vessel Standards concerning conical components under internal pressure, with a focus on improving safety, reliability, and compliance with industry standards. Existing European standards are reviewed, identifying potential gaps and proposing practical solutions. The paper also presents research findings on the influence of cone apex angles, shell geometries and design pressure on cone plate thickness calculations. A new methodology for the design and analysis of conical components in pressure vessels is proposed, offering a potential pathway to safer and more efficient pressure vessels. A range of cylinder diameter between 1000 and 2500 mm and cone angles between 30° and 60° are used as input to quantify the difference in cone thickness for a design pressure ranging between 10 and 200 bar<sub>g</sub>. The proposed method yields results much closer to AD2000 compared to EN13445, leading to slightly thicker cones (up to 2.2 mm for the selected range of cone diameters and angles) compared to the former, resulting in safer pressure vessel design, and thinner cones (up to 22 mm) compared to the latter resulting in significant material savings. A comparative analysis was performed through Finite Element Analysis validating the EN13445 unsuitability for cone thickness calculations. A modification is proposed for equation (7.6)-(8) in EN13445 resulting in thinner plates reducing the cone plate thickness difference to 0.9 % on average compared to the current deviation of -9.6 % on average for the selected range of cylinder diameters and cone angles.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping\",\"volume\":\"211 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308016124001340\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308016124001340","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative analysis and enhancement of conical component calculation under internal pressure in European pressure vessel Standards
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of conical components in pressure vessels emphasizing their significance when utilized to transition between different diameters or slopes. A thorough design and analysis are underscored as essential for ensuring the safety and reliability of these components under diverse loading circumstances. The paper aims to propose enhancements to the European Pressure Vessel Standards concerning conical components under internal pressure, with a focus on improving safety, reliability, and compliance with industry standards. Existing European standards are reviewed, identifying potential gaps and proposing practical solutions. The paper also presents research findings on the influence of cone apex angles, shell geometries and design pressure on cone plate thickness calculations. A new methodology for the design and analysis of conical components in pressure vessels is proposed, offering a potential pathway to safer and more efficient pressure vessels. A range of cylinder diameter between 1000 and 2500 mm and cone angles between 30° and 60° are used as input to quantify the difference in cone thickness for a design pressure ranging between 10 and 200 barg. The proposed method yields results much closer to AD2000 compared to EN13445, leading to slightly thicker cones (up to 2.2 mm for the selected range of cone diameters and angles) compared to the former, resulting in safer pressure vessel design, and thinner cones (up to 22 mm) compared to the latter resulting in significant material savings. A comparative analysis was performed through Finite Element Analysis validating the EN13445 unsuitability for cone thickness calculations. A modification is proposed for equation (7.6)-(8) in EN13445 resulting in thinner plates reducing the cone plate thickness difference to 0.9 % on average compared to the current deviation of -9.6 % on average for the selected range of cylinder diameters and cone angles.
期刊介绍:
Pressure vessel engineering technology is of importance in many branches of industry. This journal publishes the latest research results and related information on all its associated aspects, with particular emphasis on the structural integrity assessment, maintenance and life extension of pressurised process engineering plants.
The anticipated coverage of the International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping ranges from simple mass-produced pressure vessels to large custom-built vessels and tanks. Pressure vessels technology is a developing field, and contributions on the following topics will therefore be welcome:
• Pressure vessel engineering
• Structural integrity assessment
• Design methods
• Codes and standards
• Fabrication and welding
• Materials properties requirements
• Inspection and quality management
• Maintenance and life extension
• Ageing and environmental effects
• Life management
Of particular importance are papers covering aspects of significant practical application which could lead to major improvements in economy, reliability and useful life. While most accepted papers represent the results of original applied research, critical reviews of topical interest by world-leading experts will also appear from time to time.
International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping is indispensable reading for engineering professionals involved in the energy, petrochemicals, process plant, transport, aerospace and related industries; for manufacturers of pressure vessels and ancillary equipment; and for academics pursuing research in these areas.