喜马拉雅西部主要森林中药草的多样性、产量潜力和经济价值

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY
Pradeep Singh, Himanshu Bargali, Saurav Pant, GCS Negi
{"title":"喜马拉雅西部主要森林中药草的多样性、产量潜力和经济价值","authors":"Pradeep Singh,&nbsp;Himanshu Bargali,&nbsp;Saurav Pant,&nbsp;GCS Negi","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The forests of Himalayan mountains are rich in diversity of medicinal herbs that contributes immensely to the health care and economy of local people. To ensure sustainable utilization of this precious resource under changing climate and declining biodiversity, it is necessary to understand the diversity, yield potential, and economic value of these medicinal herbs. The study aims to evaluate the diversity, yield potential, and economic value of medicinal herbs in Western Himalayan forests, across different forest stands. We studied three dominant forest types (250–2500 m asl) by employing twenty-seven randomly laid plots measuring 0.1 ha (810 sub-plots of 1×1m) in low Tropical Dry and Moist Deciduous forests (TMDF), mid Subtropical Pine forests (SPF) and high Himalayan Moist Temperate forests (HMTF) altitude forests and recorded a total of 52 economically important herb species falling under 38 families and 46 genera. The SPF was rich in medicinal herbs (46 spp.) than the HMTF (31 spp.) and TMDF (04 spp.). Leaves of 27 % species, followed by whole plants (16 % species), root (13 % species), flowers (10 % species), stem (8 % species), rhizome (8 % species), and shoots (8 % species) were used traditionally by the local people for the treatment of 41 different diseases. The yield (g/ha) of the medicinal herbs was recorded maximum in TMDF (4217.5), followed by HMTF (2455) and minimum (2318) in SPF forest. Economic valuation of the medicinal herbs revealed maximum (Rs. 3546/ ha) value for SPF (Rs. 3546/ha), followed by HMTF (Rs. 2405/ ha), and minimum for TMDF (Rs. 576 /ha). The maximum value was recorded for <em>Hedychium spicatum</em> and least for <em>Agrimonia japonica</em>. This pioneering study provides species-specific contribution of these medicinal herbs in the economic value of these forests that will facilitate development of forest management plan to sustainably utilise and conserve them as well as to improve livelihoods of the local people. These medicinal herbs not only contribute to healthcare but also play a significant role in food and nutritional security by providing essential nutrients and medicinal properties that support the well-being of local communities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001328/pdfft?md5=0196967ac5b10aa052abc60f77bdbf37&pid=1-s2.0-S2666719324001328-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity, yield potential and economic value of medicinal herbs in dominant forests of western Himalaya\",\"authors\":\"Pradeep Singh,&nbsp;Himanshu Bargali,&nbsp;Saurav Pant,&nbsp;GCS Negi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The forests of Himalayan mountains are rich in diversity of medicinal herbs that contributes immensely to the health care and economy of local people. To ensure sustainable utilization of this precious resource under changing climate and declining biodiversity, it is necessary to understand the diversity, yield potential, and economic value of these medicinal herbs. The study aims to evaluate the diversity, yield potential, and economic value of medicinal herbs in Western Himalayan forests, across different forest stands. We studied three dominant forest types (250–2500 m asl) by employing twenty-seven randomly laid plots measuring 0.1 ha (810 sub-plots of 1×1m) in low Tropical Dry and Moist Deciduous forests (TMDF), mid Subtropical Pine forests (SPF) and high Himalayan Moist Temperate forests (HMTF) altitude forests and recorded a total of 52 economically important herb species falling under 38 families and 46 genera. The SPF was rich in medicinal herbs (46 spp.) than the HMTF (31 spp.) and TMDF (04 spp.). Leaves of 27 % species, followed by whole plants (16 % species), root (13 % species), flowers (10 % species), stem (8 % species), rhizome (8 % species), and shoots (8 % species) were used traditionally by the local people for the treatment of 41 different diseases. The yield (g/ha) of the medicinal herbs was recorded maximum in TMDF (4217.5), followed by HMTF (2455) and minimum (2318) in SPF forest. Economic valuation of the medicinal herbs revealed maximum (Rs. 3546/ ha) value for SPF (Rs. 3546/ha), followed by HMTF (Rs. 2405/ ha), and minimum for TMDF (Rs. 576 /ha). The maximum value was recorded for <em>Hedychium spicatum</em> and least for <em>Agrimonia japonica</em>. This pioneering study provides species-specific contribution of these medicinal herbs in the economic value of these forests that will facilitate development of forest management plan to sustainably utilise and conserve them as well as to improve livelihoods of the local people. These medicinal herbs not only contribute to healthcare but also play a significant role in food and nutritional security by providing essential nutrients and medicinal properties that support the well-being of local communities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trees, Forests and People\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001328/pdfft?md5=0196967ac5b10aa052abc60f77bdbf37&pid=1-s2.0-S2666719324001328-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trees, Forests and People\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

喜马拉雅山脉的森林中蕴藏着丰富多样的药草,为当地人民的医疗保健和经济发展做出了巨大贡献。为确保在气候不断变化、生物多样性不断减少的情况下可持续地利用这一宝贵资源,有必要了解这些药草的多样性、产量潜力和经济价值。本研究旨在评估喜马拉雅西部森林中不同林分的药草多样性、产量潜力和经济价值。我们在低海拔的热带干燥和湿润落叶林(TMDF)、中海拔的亚热带松树林(SPF)和高海拔的喜马拉雅湿润温带林(HMTF)随机划分了 27 个面积为 0.1 公顷的小区(810 个 1×1 米的小小区),对三种主要森林类型(海拔 250-2500 米)进行了研究,共记录了 52 种具有重要经济价值的草本植物,分属 38 科 46 属。与喜马拉雅湿温带高海拔森林(31 种)和高海拔热带雨林(04 种)相比,喜马拉雅湿温带高海拔森林的药用草本植物(46 种)更为丰富。叶(27 % 种)、全株(16 % 种)、根(13 % 种)、花(10 % 种)、茎(8 % 种)、根茎(8 % 种)和嫩枝(8 % 种)被当地人传统用于治疗 41 种不同的疾病。药材产量(克/公顷)最高的是屯粮林(4217.5 克/公顷),其次是高棉屯粮林(2455 克/公顷),最低的是南太平洋屯粮林(2318 克/公顷)。药材的经济价值显示,SPF 的价值最高(3546 卢比/公顷),其次是 HMTF(2405 卢比/公顷),而 TMDF 的价值最低(576 卢比/公顷)。Hedychium spicatum 的价值最高,而 Agrimonia japonica 的价值最低。这项开创性的研究提供了这些药草在这些森林的经济价值中的具体贡献,这将有助于制定森林管理计划,以可持续地利用和保护这些药草,并改善当地人的生计。这些药草不仅有助于医疗保健,还通过提供必要的营养物质和药用特性,在食物和营养安全方面发挥着重要作用,为当地社区的福祉提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diversity, yield potential and economic value of medicinal herbs in dominant forests of western Himalaya

Diversity, yield potential and economic value of medicinal herbs in dominant forests of western Himalaya

The forests of Himalayan mountains are rich in diversity of medicinal herbs that contributes immensely to the health care and economy of local people. To ensure sustainable utilization of this precious resource under changing climate and declining biodiversity, it is necessary to understand the diversity, yield potential, and economic value of these medicinal herbs. The study aims to evaluate the diversity, yield potential, and economic value of medicinal herbs in Western Himalayan forests, across different forest stands. We studied three dominant forest types (250–2500 m asl) by employing twenty-seven randomly laid plots measuring 0.1 ha (810 sub-plots of 1×1m) in low Tropical Dry and Moist Deciduous forests (TMDF), mid Subtropical Pine forests (SPF) and high Himalayan Moist Temperate forests (HMTF) altitude forests and recorded a total of 52 economically important herb species falling under 38 families and 46 genera. The SPF was rich in medicinal herbs (46 spp.) than the HMTF (31 spp.) and TMDF (04 spp.). Leaves of 27 % species, followed by whole plants (16 % species), root (13 % species), flowers (10 % species), stem (8 % species), rhizome (8 % species), and shoots (8 % species) were used traditionally by the local people for the treatment of 41 different diseases. The yield (g/ha) of the medicinal herbs was recorded maximum in TMDF (4217.5), followed by HMTF (2455) and minimum (2318) in SPF forest. Economic valuation of the medicinal herbs revealed maximum (Rs. 3546/ ha) value for SPF (Rs. 3546/ha), followed by HMTF (Rs. 2405/ ha), and minimum for TMDF (Rs. 576 /ha). The maximum value was recorded for Hedychium spicatum and least for Agrimonia japonica. This pioneering study provides species-specific contribution of these medicinal herbs in the economic value of these forests that will facilitate development of forest management plan to sustainably utilise and conserve them as well as to improve livelihoods of the local people. These medicinal herbs not only contribute to healthcare but also play a significant role in food and nutritional security by providing essential nutrients and medicinal properties that support the well-being of local communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信