Martin N. Stienen , Gregor Fischer , Linda Bättig , Anand Veeravagu , Benjamin Martens
{"title":"使用可扩张椎间融合器的微创侧胸椎和腰椎椎间融合术(LLIF)--注意事项、并发症和结果","authors":"Martin N. Stienen , Gregor Fischer , Linda Bättig , Anand Veeravagu , Benjamin Martens","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2024.102870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Reports about lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody fusion (LLIF) using expandable interbody spacers are sparse.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>To report our experience with the use of expandable spacers for LLIF.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>We reviewed all consecutive LLIF patients with use of an expandable titanium interbody implant (ELSA® Expandable Integrated LLIF Spacer, Globus Medical Inc, PA (USA)) between September 2018 and January 2024.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 503 patients, in which we performed LLIF at 732 levels. In 63 patients (12.5%) and 70 levels (9.6%) an expandable spacer was used. The mean age was 61.4 years, 57.1% were females. LLIF was performed between T11/12 – L4/5 in the setting of fusion procedures (mono-/bisegmental (20; 28.6%), 3–7 segments (29; 41.4%); >7 segments (21; 30.0%)), of which 21 (33.3%), 20 (31.8%) and 22 (34.9%) were for traumatic, deformity/revision and other diagnoses. Surgery included release of the anterior longitudinal ligament in 30 cases (42.9%). Intraoperative adverse events (AEs) were noted in 2 (3.2%), postoperative AEs in 27 (42.9%) at discharge, 17 (27.0%) at 3 months and 14 (22.2%) at 12 months. Segmental sagittal Cobb angle changed from 1.3° (preoperative) to 13.0° at discharge (p < 0.001), 12.7° at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 13.3° at 12 months (p < 0.001). Functional outcome was excellent/good in 43 (68.3%; 5 missing) at 3 months and in 37 (58.7%; 10 missing) at 12 months.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>The use of LLIF with an expandable spacer was safe, promoted solid fusion and enabled powerful correction of sagittal segmental Cobb angle, which was maintained during follow-up.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 102870"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424001267/pdfft?md5=0147aecbd07aaeb10910838cd5c3d1cc&pid=1-s2.0-S2772529424001267-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally-invasive lateral thoracic and lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with expandable interbody cages – Considerations, complications & outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Martin N. Stienen , Gregor Fischer , Linda Bättig , Anand Veeravagu , Benjamin Martens\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bas.2024.102870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Reports about lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody fusion (LLIF) using expandable interbody spacers are sparse.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>To report our experience with the use of expandable spacers for LLIF.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>We reviewed all consecutive LLIF patients with use of an expandable titanium interbody implant (ELSA® Expandable Integrated LLIF Spacer, Globus Medical Inc, PA (USA)) between September 2018 and January 2024.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 503 patients, in which we performed LLIF at 732 levels. In 63 patients (12.5%) and 70 levels (9.6%) an expandable spacer was used. The mean age was 61.4 years, 57.1% were females. LLIF was performed between T11/12 – L4/5 in the setting of fusion procedures (mono-/bisegmental (20; 28.6%), 3–7 segments (29; 41.4%); >7 segments (21; 30.0%)), of which 21 (33.3%), 20 (31.8%) and 22 (34.9%) were for traumatic, deformity/revision and other diagnoses. Surgery included release of the anterior longitudinal ligament in 30 cases (42.9%). Intraoperative adverse events (AEs) were noted in 2 (3.2%), postoperative AEs in 27 (42.9%) at discharge, 17 (27.0%) at 3 months and 14 (22.2%) at 12 months. Segmental sagittal Cobb angle changed from 1.3° (preoperative) to 13.0° at discharge (p < 0.001), 12.7° at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 13.3° at 12 months (p < 0.001). Functional outcome was excellent/good in 43 (68.3%; 5 missing) at 3 months and in 37 (58.7%; 10 missing) at 12 months.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>The use of LLIF with an expandable spacer was safe, promoted solid fusion and enabled powerful correction of sagittal segmental Cobb angle, which was maintained during follow-up.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain & spine\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102870\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424001267/pdfft?md5=0147aecbd07aaeb10910838cd5c3d1cc&pid=1-s2.0-S2772529424001267-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain & spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424001267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424001267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Minimally-invasive lateral thoracic and lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with expandable interbody cages – Considerations, complications & outcomes
Introduction
Reports about lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody fusion (LLIF) using expandable interbody spacers are sparse.
Research question
To report our experience with the use of expandable spacers for LLIF.
Material and methods
We reviewed all consecutive LLIF patients with use of an expandable titanium interbody implant (ELSA® Expandable Integrated LLIF Spacer, Globus Medical Inc, PA (USA)) between September 2018 and January 2024.
Results
We identified 503 patients, in which we performed LLIF at 732 levels. In 63 patients (12.5%) and 70 levels (9.6%) an expandable spacer was used. The mean age was 61.4 years, 57.1% were females. LLIF was performed between T11/12 – L4/5 in the setting of fusion procedures (mono-/bisegmental (20; 28.6%), 3–7 segments (29; 41.4%); >7 segments (21; 30.0%)), of which 21 (33.3%), 20 (31.8%) and 22 (34.9%) were for traumatic, deformity/revision and other diagnoses. Surgery included release of the anterior longitudinal ligament in 30 cases (42.9%). Intraoperative adverse events (AEs) were noted in 2 (3.2%), postoperative AEs in 27 (42.9%) at discharge, 17 (27.0%) at 3 months and 14 (22.2%) at 12 months. Segmental sagittal Cobb angle changed from 1.3° (preoperative) to 13.0° at discharge (p < 0.001), 12.7° at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 13.3° at 12 months (p < 0.001). Functional outcome was excellent/good in 43 (68.3%; 5 missing) at 3 months and in 37 (58.7%; 10 missing) at 12 months.
Discussion and conclusion
The use of LLIF with an expandable spacer was safe, promoted solid fusion and enabled powerful correction of sagittal segmental Cobb angle, which was maintained during follow-up.