{"title":"\"我们这个时代最可怕的流行病就是恐惧\"。- 西娅-多恩的《特罗斯特》中的疾病和流行病。给马克斯的信","authors":"Saniye Uysal Ünalan","doi":"10.58221/mosp.v118i1.19489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the course of the pandemic since 2020 we have experienced different ways of life in public and private spaces, healthcare as well as work. Doris Bachmann-Medick talks about a ‘pandemic turn’ and claims, that the coronavirus pandemic implies a kind of crisis situation for human existence in our global reality. Everything has changed with the pandemic. Especially the biopolitical measures as well as health policy have entailed significant changes in social and individual living conditions. Literary discourses as a particular part of culture have the significant potential to reflect and criticize certain aspects of society and culture. Thea Dorn’s Corona novel Trost. Briefe an Max can obviously be described as a reaction to and literary reception of the Corona-era since 2020. The first-person narrator Johanna works as a culture journalist. She recently lost her mother, who travelled to Italy despite the pandemic. In her letters to her philosophy teacher, she expresses her immeasurable sadness and anger due to the new way of living because of the pandemic. The critical attitude of the novel is remarkable in terms of absolutization since helping becomes a part of biopolitics in times of the pandemic that leads to a tragic situation for the subject. In this article, I will analyze Thea Dorn’s Trost. Briefe an Max with reference to the approaches of Giorgio Agamben in Homo Sacer concerning biopolitics. In this context, especially the critical potential and attitude of this novel get important.","PeriodicalId":168458,"journal":{"name":"Moderna Språk","volume":"45 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"„Die schlimmste Seuche unserer Tage ist die Angst.“ – Krankheit und Pandemie in Thea Dorns Trost. Briefe an Max\",\"authors\":\"Saniye Uysal Ünalan\",\"doi\":\"10.58221/mosp.v118i1.19489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the course of the pandemic since 2020 we have experienced different ways of life in public and private spaces, healthcare as well as work. Doris Bachmann-Medick talks about a ‘pandemic turn’ and claims, that the coronavirus pandemic implies a kind of crisis situation for human existence in our global reality. Everything has changed with the pandemic. Especially the biopolitical measures as well as health policy have entailed significant changes in social and individual living conditions. Literary discourses as a particular part of culture have the significant potential to reflect and criticize certain aspects of society and culture. Thea Dorn’s Corona novel Trost. Briefe an Max can obviously be described as a reaction to and literary reception of the Corona-era since 2020. The first-person narrator Johanna works as a culture journalist. She recently lost her mother, who travelled to Italy despite the pandemic. In her letters to her philosophy teacher, she expresses her immeasurable sadness and anger due to the new way of living because of the pandemic. The critical attitude of the novel is remarkable in terms of absolutization since helping becomes a part of biopolitics in times of the pandemic that leads to a tragic situation for the subject. In this article, I will analyze Thea Dorn’s Trost. Briefe an Max with reference to the approaches of Giorgio Agamben in Homo Sacer concerning biopolitics. In this context, especially the critical potential and attitude of this novel get important.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Moderna Språk\",\"volume\":\"45 1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Moderna Språk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58221/mosp.v118i1.19489\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moderna Språk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58221/mosp.v118i1.19489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在 2020 年以来的大流行过程中,我们在公共和私人空间、医疗保健和工作中体验到了不同的生活方式。多丽丝-巴赫曼-梅迪克(Doris Bachmann-Medick)谈到了 "大流行病的转折",并声称冠状病毒大流行意味着我们全球现实中人类生存的一种危机状况。大流行病改变了一切。特别是生物政治措施和卫生政策使社会和个人的生活条件发生了重大变化。文学话语作为文化的一个特殊组成部分,在反映和批判社会文化的某些方面具有重要的潜力。Thea Dorn 的科罗娜小说《Trost.Briefe an Max》显然可以说是对 2020 年以来科罗纳时代的反应和文学接受。第一人称叙述者约翰娜是一名文化记者。她最近失去了不顾疫情前往意大利的母亲。在写给哲学老师的信中,她表达了对大流行病带来的新生活方式的无限悲愤。小说的批判态度具有显著的绝对化特征,因为在大流行病时期,"帮助 "成为生物政治的一部分,导致了主题的悲剧性局面。在本文中,我将分析 Thea Dorn 的《Trost.Briefe an Max》,并参考乔治-阿甘本(Giorgio Agamben)在《圣人》(Homo Sacer)一书中关于生物政治的方法。在这方面,这部小说的批判潜力和态度尤为重要。
„Die schlimmste Seuche unserer Tage ist die Angst.“ – Krankheit und Pandemie in Thea Dorns Trost. Briefe an Max
In the course of the pandemic since 2020 we have experienced different ways of life in public and private spaces, healthcare as well as work. Doris Bachmann-Medick talks about a ‘pandemic turn’ and claims, that the coronavirus pandemic implies a kind of crisis situation for human existence in our global reality. Everything has changed with the pandemic. Especially the biopolitical measures as well as health policy have entailed significant changes in social and individual living conditions. Literary discourses as a particular part of culture have the significant potential to reflect and criticize certain aspects of society and culture. Thea Dorn’s Corona novel Trost. Briefe an Max can obviously be described as a reaction to and literary reception of the Corona-era since 2020. The first-person narrator Johanna works as a culture journalist. She recently lost her mother, who travelled to Italy despite the pandemic. In her letters to her philosophy teacher, she expresses her immeasurable sadness and anger due to the new way of living because of the pandemic. The critical attitude of the novel is remarkable in terms of absolutization since helping becomes a part of biopolitics in times of the pandemic that leads to a tragic situation for the subject. In this article, I will analyze Thea Dorn’s Trost. Briefe an Max with reference to the approaches of Giorgio Agamben in Homo Sacer concerning biopolitics. In this context, especially the critical potential and attitude of this novel get important.