{"title":"环境、社会和治理评级的不确定性与机构投资--来自中国的证据","authors":"Miao Zeng , Xiaoyu Zhu , Xin Deng , Jiang Du","doi":"10.1016/j.bir.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using panel data on China's A-share listed enterprises from 2015 to 2022, this study applies a fixed effects model of the year, industry, and region to empirically test the impact of ESG ratings and ESG rating uncertainty on institutional investment. The results of this study find that: (1) ESG ratings significantly and positively affect institutional investment, but the existence of ESG rating uncertainty significantly and negatively affects institutional investment. Meanwhile, ESG rating uncertainty weakens the influence of ESG ratings on institutional investment. (2) Institutional investors are more sensitive to the ESG rating uncertainty of enterprises that are government-related (state-owned and politic connected), executive-right-expanded, loss-making, non-heavy-polluting, non-high-tech, and in the eastern region. Meanwhile, passive institutional investors are more sensitive to the ESG rating uncertainty. (3) The number of institutional investors, government subsidies, and securities market performance are the channels through which ESG rating uncertainty affects institutional investment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46690,"journal":{"name":"Borsa Istanbul Review","volume":"24 6","pages":"Pages 1166-1178"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ESG rating uncertainty and institutional investment—evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Miao Zeng , Xiaoyu Zhu , Xin Deng , Jiang Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bir.2024.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Using panel data on China's A-share listed enterprises from 2015 to 2022, this study applies a fixed effects model of the year, industry, and region to empirically test the impact of ESG ratings and ESG rating uncertainty on institutional investment. The results of this study find that: (1) ESG ratings significantly and positively affect institutional investment, but the existence of ESG rating uncertainty significantly and negatively affects institutional investment. Meanwhile, ESG rating uncertainty weakens the influence of ESG ratings on institutional investment. (2) Institutional investors are more sensitive to the ESG rating uncertainty of enterprises that are government-related (state-owned and politic connected), executive-right-expanded, loss-making, non-heavy-polluting, non-high-tech, and in the eastern region. Meanwhile, passive institutional investors are more sensitive to the ESG rating uncertainty. (3) The number of institutional investors, government subsidies, and securities market performance are the channels through which ESG rating uncertainty affects institutional investment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Borsa Istanbul Review\",\"volume\":\"24 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1166-1178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Borsa Istanbul Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024001078\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Borsa Istanbul Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845024001078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
ESG rating uncertainty and institutional investment—evidence from China
Using panel data on China's A-share listed enterprises from 2015 to 2022, this study applies a fixed effects model of the year, industry, and region to empirically test the impact of ESG ratings and ESG rating uncertainty on institutional investment. The results of this study find that: (1) ESG ratings significantly and positively affect institutional investment, but the existence of ESG rating uncertainty significantly and negatively affects institutional investment. Meanwhile, ESG rating uncertainty weakens the influence of ESG ratings on institutional investment. (2) Institutional investors are more sensitive to the ESG rating uncertainty of enterprises that are government-related (state-owned and politic connected), executive-right-expanded, loss-making, non-heavy-polluting, non-high-tech, and in the eastern region. Meanwhile, passive institutional investors are more sensitive to the ESG rating uncertainty. (3) The number of institutional investors, government subsidies, and securities market performance are the channels through which ESG rating uncertainty affects institutional investment.
期刊介绍:
Peer Review under the responsibility of Borsa İstanbul Anonim Sirketi. Borsa İstanbul Review provides a scholarly platform for empirical financial studies including but not limited to financial markets and institutions, financial economics, investor behavior, financial centers and market structures, corporate finance, recent economic and financial trends. Micro and macro data applications and comparative studies are welcome. Country coverage includes advanced, emerging and developing economies. In particular, we would like to publish empirical papers with significant policy implications and encourage submissions in the following areas: Research Topics: • Investments and Portfolio Management • Behavioral Finance • Financial Markets and Institutions • Market Microstructure • Islamic Finance • Financial Risk Management • Valuation • Capital Markets Governance • Financial Regulations