贝克无望感量表德文简表在三个不同样本中的心理测量学检验和因子效度

Q3 Psychology
T. Forkmann , J. Eimen , L. Plein , I. Höller , L. Böhler , A. Schönfelder , N. Hallensleben , D. Schreiber , L. Paashaus , G. Juckel , T. Teismann , H. Glaesmer , L. Spangenberg
{"title":"贝克无望感量表德文简表在三个不同样本中的心理测量学检验和因子效度","authors":"T. Forkmann ,&nbsp;J. Eimen ,&nbsp;L. Plein ,&nbsp;I. Höller ,&nbsp;L. Böhler ,&nbsp;A. Schönfelder ,&nbsp;N. Hallensleben ,&nbsp;D. Schreiber ,&nbsp;L. Paashaus ,&nbsp;G. Juckel ,&nbsp;T. Teismann ,&nbsp;H. Glaesmer ,&nbsp;L. Spangenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hopelessness is a transdiagnostically relevant clinical construct, related to depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and suicidality. Economic, valid, and reliable assessment of hopelessness is thus crucial for both research and clinical practice. This study aimed at validating a nine-item short version of the Beck Hopelessness Scale in three large German samples of psychiatric inpatients, psychotherapy outpatients, and healthy controls.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data from <em>N</em> = 2321 participants (86.3 % female, mean age 31.8 years [SD=10.4]) were used to analyze reliability, factorial validity, concurrent and discriminant validity of the BHS-9.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Results showed good psychometric characteristics of the BHS-9 in inpatients, supporting its unidimensionality, construct validity, and reliability. However, factorial validity was insufficient in outpatients and controls.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>In the outpatient and control samples, the majority of participants were women. All reported analyses were cross-sectional.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The BHS-9 appears to be suitable for assessing hopelessness in psychiatric inpatients. However, the factorial validity of this short instrument in non-inpatient settings should be subject to future studies before its implementation in these person groups can be recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100822"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001082/pdfft?md5=ec3e5099887d6a0cd634185d23827135&pid=1-s2.0-S2666915324001082-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric examination and factorial validity of a German short form of the Beck Hopelessness Scale in three different samples\",\"authors\":\"T. Forkmann ,&nbsp;J. Eimen ,&nbsp;L. Plein ,&nbsp;I. Höller ,&nbsp;L. Böhler ,&nbsp;A. Schönfelder ,&nbsp;N. Hallensleben ,&nbsp;D. Schreiber ,&nbsp;L. Paashaus ,&nbsp;G. Juckel ,&nbsp;T. Teismann ,&nbsp;H. Glaesmer ,&nbsp;L. Spangenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hopelessness is a transdiagnostically relevant clinical construct, related to depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and suicidality. Economic, valid, and reliable assessment of hopelessness is thus crucial for both research and clinical practice. This study aimed at validating a nine-item short version of the Beck Hopelessness Scale in three large German samples of psychiatric inpatients, psychotherapy outpatients, and healthy controls.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data from <em>N</em> = 2321 participants (86.3 % female, mean age 31.8 years [SD=10.4]) were used to analyze reliability, factorial validity, concurrent and discriminant validity of the BHS-9.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Results showed good psychometric characteristics of the BHS-9 in inpatients, supporting its unidimensionality, construct validity, and reliability. However, factorial validity was insufficient in outpatients and controls.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>In the outpatient and control samples, the majority of participants were women. All reported analyses were cross-sectional.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The BHS-9 appears to be suitable for assessing hopelessness in psychiatric inpatients. However, the factorial validity of this short instrument in non-inpatient settings should be subject to future studies before its implementation in these person groups can be recommended.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100822\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001082/pdfft?md5=ec3e5099887d6a0cd634185d23827135&pid=1-s2.0-S2666915324001082-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景无望感是一种与抑郁症、创伤后应激障碍和自杀有关的跨诊断相关临床结构。因此,对无望感进行经济、有效和可靠的评估对研究和临床实践都至关重要。本研究的目的是在德国三个大型精神病住院患者、心理治疗门诊患者和健康对照者样本中验证 Beck 无望感量表的九个条目简版。结果结果显示,BHS-9 在住院患者中具有良好的心理测量特征,支持其单维性、建构有效性和可靠性。局限性在门诊病人和对照组样本中,大多数参与者为女性。结论BHS-9似乎适用于评估精神病住院患者的绝望感。然而,在非住院环境中使用这一简短工具的因子有效性还需要未来的研究来验证,然后才能建议在这些人群中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric examination and factorial validity of a German short form of the Beck Hopelessness Scale in three different samples

Background

Hopelessness is a transdiagnostically relevant clinical construct, related to depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and suicidality. Economic, valid, and reliable assessment of hopelessness is thus crucial for both research and clinical practice. This study aimed at validating a nine-item short version of the Beck Hopelessness Scale in three large German samples of psychiatric inpatients, psychotherapy outpatients, and healthy controls.

Methods

Data from N = 2321 participants (86.3 % female, mean age 31.8 years [SD=10.4]) were used to analyze reliability, factorial validity, concurrent and discriminant validity of the BHS-9.

Results

Results showed good psychometric characteristics of the BHS-9 in inpatients, supporting its unidimensionality, construct validity, and reliability. However, factorial validity was insufficient in outpatients and controls.

Limitations

In the outpatient and control samples, the majority of participants were women. All reported analyses were cross-sectional.

Conclusions

The BHS-9 appears to be suitable for assessing hopelessness in psychiatric inpatients. However, the factorial validity of this short instrument in non-inpatient settings should be subject to future studies before its implementation in these person groups can be recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信